Showing posts with label justice system. Show all posts
Showing posts with label justice system. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

The Labour MPs determined to show they represent Israel, not the British people

The Labour MPs determined to show they represent Israel, not the British people

Labour wants the repression of Palestine Action to serve as a blueprint for politics. Why not lock up opposition party leaders and any constituents who protest government policy?

Johnathan Cook, June 17, 2026

Mike Tapp, a minister in the Home Office, recently posted on X a “gotcha” response to Green Party leader Zack Polanski’s criticism of the Labour government’s decision to proscribe Palestine Action. 

In the wake of the Court of Appeal ruling this week to uphold proscription, Polanski noted the government’s authoritarian assault on civil liberties. Thousands of grandparents –retired lawyers, doctors, vicars, army veterans – he pointed out, had been arrested on terrorism charges simply for holding a placard saying: “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.”

In response, Tapp asked Polanski: “Do you support the Palestine Action group?”

This was Tapp’s attempt at entrapment. If Polanski answered in the affirmative, he could be jailed for up to 14 years – because of the unprecedented decision Tapp’s own Home Office took to declare Palestine Action a terrorist organisation. 

No direct action group in the UK’s history has ever before been designated a terrorist group, on a par with al-Qaeda and Islamic State.

Tapp clearly thought he was being clever. But all he was really doing was further exposing the ugly, patently authoritarian nature of the government he serves in and its complicity in Israel’s endless atrocities in Gaza.

Tapp is not some disinterested party in all this. He is a vice-chair of Labour Friends of Israel, the genocide-compatible wing of the Labour party that dominates the cabinet.

Investigative journalist Paul Holden noted on X: 

Tapp has taken money and benefits from Labour Together, Labour Friends of Israel and Stuart Roden, who founded the Israeli-based VC company Hetz Ventures with Judah Taub. Taub is a former IDF Special Forces operative who served as an IDF reservist in Gaza. 

The Labour government is stuffed with compromised individuals like Mike Tapp, who serve as Israel’s cheerleaders in the UK. 

In addition, or more likely as a consequence, many of these ministers, from Keir Starmer down, receive large donations from the Israel lobby. 

Polanski replied to Tapp: “The fact that your government has made it illegal for me to answer yes is a damning testament to your flagrant disregard for civil liberties.”

The McCarthy-emulating Tapp is not some outlier in the Labour party. He is its beating heart. It was his wing of the party, at the behest of the Israel lobby and working covertly through the unlawful activities of Labour Together, that helped confect an imaginary “antisemitism crisis” in the party in the second half of the 2010s. 

Their goal was to use anti-democratic means to drive Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters out of the Labour party and put corporate donors and the Israel lobby firmly back in charge of policy.

While Tapp was seeking to jail the only Jewish leader of a major British political party this week, it emerged that another Labour MP, Peter Kyle, had reported a female constituent of his in Brighton to the police. She was arrested and charged after writing to him in protest at the government’s support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Kyle apparently believed that, in writing to him, her MP, the woman had committed a crime under the Communications Act by “causing him annoyance”. Presumably, Kyle finds it annoying to be reminded of his party’s collusion in genocide. 

And presumably he imagines too that, in his version of democracy, MPs should never be questioned by those they represent on ethical issues, such as complicity in a genocide. 

Shockingly the Crown Prosecution Service agreed to pursue Kyle’s case through the courts, proving once again that it is nothing more than an adjunct of the executive branch. 

In a rare sign of the independence of the judiciary – at least at its lowest levels – a local magistrate threw the case out this week. 

There is, of course, a connecting thread in these two cases: both Labour MPs hoped to use the law to crush criticism of their party’s continuing support for Israel’s genocide.

They imagine their authoritarian repression of Palestine Action can serve as a blueprint for British politics. Why not lock up opposition party leaders and any constituent who dares to write protesting at their criminal behaviour? 

This is how Starmer’s Labour party conducts its politics: through intimidation, disinformation and show trials. 

And they do it not for our benefit or, as they keep proclaiming, in the interests of “national security”. 

No, they do it for the benefit of a foreign government viewed, even in Israel, as the most extreme in its history, one that includes self-declared fascists who Israel’s former top general, Moshe Yaalon, this week compared to the Nazis.

The Starmer government is tapping deep into its own fascist instincts. And with Nigel Farage’s Reform party nipping at its heels, there is little hope that the situation is going to improve any time soon.

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

8647: The Criminalization of Meaning in an Age of Power


"Cool shell formation on my beach walk." ( James Comey)


8647  The Criminalization of Meaning in an Age of Power


Bruce Fanger

White Rose | April 29, 2026


 

There are moments when a system does not quietly drift off course. It exposes itself. 

 

The federal indictment of James Comey over a photograph of seashells arranged to read “8647” is one of those moments. On the surface it looks absurd. Look closer and it becomes something far more revealing. It is a fracture in how power now treats speech, intent, and dissent.

 

The indictment, filed just yesterday, marks a second attempt after an earlier case collapsed. The post in question was quickly deleted, with Comey describing it as a beachside curiosity rather than a threat. None of that stopped the machinery from moving forward.

 

This is no longer about shells. It is about whether symbols themselves can be turned into crimes.

 

The government’s case rests on translation. “86” becomes “eliminate.” “47” becomes the president. From there, prosecutors construct intent. No weapon. No plan. No timeline. No action. Only a symbol, stretched until it snaps into a felony.

 

That is not law enforcement. That is prosecution by interpretation.

 

For decades, “86” has lived comfortably in American slang. It meant the kitchen ran out of something. It meant a bar threw someone out. It meant move on, clear it out, get rid of the problem. It was imprecise, contextual, and mostly harmless. Now, under political pressure, that same elasticity is being recast as evidence of violent intent.

 

Once that door opens, it does not close neatly.

 

Because if speech is no longer anchored in what is said or done, but in what power claims to perceive, then the standard shifts. The boundary moves. The rules are no longer fixed.

 

And that is where the danger lives.

 

There is a bitter irony here. An administration that markets itself as tough, unbothered, and relentlessly combative has chosen to deploy the full weight of federal law against a photograph. Not a coordinated threat. Not a plot. A photograph.

 

Strong governments ignore mockery. Weak ones prosecute it.

 

To sustain a conviction under federal law, prosecutors must prove a “true threat.” Not metaphor. Not offense. Not ambiguity. A real and serious expression of intent to do harm. The standard is not vague. Under Counterman v. Colorado (2023), prosecutors must show not only that a reasonable person would read the statement as a threat, but that the speaker consciously disregarded a substantial risk it would be taken that way.

 

That second prong is where this case begins to collapse.

 

If this theory holds, the implications are not subtle. It means intent can be inferred from symbolism alone. It means elastic language becomes liability. It means the state can decide what a phrase signifies, and then punish the meaning it has assigned.

 

Today it is “8647.”

 

Tomorrow it is whatever phrase, image, or joke someone in power decides crosses an invisible line.

 

This is not a slippery slope argument. It is the logical extension of the framework being tested here.

Defenders will argue that threats against the president must be taken seriously. That is true. The problem is not seriousness. The problem is elasticity.

 

If this standard were applied consistently, vast portions of political speech would fall under suspicion. Social media would be a minefield of prosecutable implication. It is not. Which leaves a different conclusion.

 

This is not about safety. It is about selective interpretation.

 

And that is where systems begin to lose legitimacy.

 

People can tolerate disagreement. They can tolerate bias. They can even tolerate hypocrisy. What they cannot tolerate for long is arbitrariness. The sense that the rules no longer exist as stable principles, but as tools that shift depending on who holds power.

 

That is the deeper damage here.

 

A government that begins to read threats into seashells is not projecting strength. It is signaling insecurity. It is revealing that it no longer trusts the boundary between speech and crime to hold on its own.

 

So it moves that boundary.

 

If this prosecution collapses, it will be remembered as overreach. If it succeeds, it will be remembered as a turning point.

 

Either way, something has already been exposed.

 

Because once the state begins to criminalize what symbols are allowed to suggest, it has already admitted what it would prefer to hide.

 

It no longer trusts itself to win in the arena of ideas.

 

#WhiteRose #FreeSpeech #FirstAmendment #RuleOfLaw #CivilLiberties #PoliticalPower #86_47


Friday, January 16, 2026

Ken Klippenstein: Leaked memo: “De-escalation is key”

 Leaked memo: “De-escalation is key”

Before Renee Good’s killing, immigration authorities sent agents a warning

Ken Klippenstein 1-16-26

ICE agent reaches into Renee Good’s vehicle

I get leaked documents bigger media don’t because I’m not slowed down by corporate bureaucracy. But because of that, I don’t have corporate money - I just have readers like you. Please become a paid subscriber so I can do more of this work (and for updates on this story!) 

Weeks before an ICE agent shot Renee Good dead in Minneapolis, the Department of Homeland Security in Washington warned about the dangers of confronting suspects in vehicles, according to a November memo leaked to me.

“For safe and effective vehicle extractions, de-escalation is key,” cautioned an internal Customs and Border Patrol guidance, signed by the head of the agency’s compliance directorate. Titled “Guidance on Safe and Legally Compliant Vehicle Extraction Operations,” the memo is referring to the same operation at the heart of the Renee Good killing: a vehicle extraction operation. That’s what the ICE agents were trying to carry out and why they approached her vehicle in the first place, with one agent even reaching through the window and grabbing the car door.

The term vehicle extraction normally refers to rescuing trapped occupants from a damaged vehicle. But DHS has its own belligerent definition: forcibly removing a suspect from their vehicle. To bolster its view that protestors are “weaponizing” vehicles, the Department has spun itself into crisis and confrontation mode, a contributing factor in Good’s death and the spate of other incidents where federal law enforcement agents and officers have attempted vehicle extractions.

Leaked memo
Leaked memo

(I’ve looked around and astoundingly, homeland security has no formal definition or policy for vehicle extraction. So much for “training” its officers on dangerous situations it might face. In her hasty press conference following Good’s death, Secretary Kristi Noem justified the shooting by claiming: “Our officer followed his training, did exactly what he’s been taught to do in that situation.”)

To understand homeland security’s frenzy about vehicles, one does not have to look very deep. Just a day after Good’s death, DHS shot off a fiery press release about the vehicle threat to its law enforcement officers. It alleges a “3,200% increase in vehicular attacks” over the past year.

“Dangerous criminals … are turning their vehicles into weapons to attack ICE and CBP,” declared another homeland security press release from late last year, adding that “DHS will not be deterred,” striking a defiant tone.

Despite this swaggering rhetoric, in private, sources tell me that immigration authorities have been worried for some time about officer and public safety in vehicle extractions and were aware that something like the Good shooting was likely to happen eventually. Done incorrectly, the leaked memo suggests, vehicle extractions are a dangerous practice.

Had the ICE agent, Jonathan Ross, heeded this kind of advice, Good would still be alive today. The guidance specifically instructs officers to avoid “unsafe positioning” near other vehicles. Ross did not do this, having stepped out in front of Good’s car — the whole basis for the administration’s claims that he was acting in necessary self-defense. (See for yourself in the frames below, with Ross highlighted for visibility.)

ICE Agent Jonathan Ross highlighted

Now compare what Ross did to homeland security’s guidance memo, which instructs officers: “Safely block the target vehicle with other vehicles, ensuring officers/agents avoid unsafe positioning.”

That Ross did not heed this doesn’t mean he’ll be arrested or even found responsible. ICE’s use of force policy all but rubber stamps the killing, as I’ve written.

But instead of any sort of introspection about what went wrong here and how it can be prevented from happening again, homeland security political leadership is dumping rhetorical gasoline on the already combustible situation.

“These vehicle rammings are domestic acts of terrorism,” Noem said on the day of Good’s death.

Then a day after Good’s death, homeland’s assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin issued a press release, blaming “sanctuary politicians” and “the media” for encouraging violent attacks on ICE.

“This unprecedented increase in violence against law enforcement is a direct result of sanctuary politicians and the media creating an environment that demonizes our law enforcement and encourages rampant assaults against them,” McLaughlin said.

DHS press release

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara has a different view, that “in law enforcement, you know, we expect our officers to be training and trying to do everything they can to de-escalate situations and avoid the use of force and certainly avoid the use — the loss of human life whenever possible.”

More than training and guidance, though, the real problem is that ICE is acting like they’re at war because many of them have been told they are and believe it. 

ICE is at war with America. So it any surprise they see cars as weapons?

Friday, January 27, 2023

Sudden Opening to Win Mumia Abu-Jamal's Freedom. Please Act NOW!

Below is an appeal from Bob Mandel of the Adult School Teachers United (ASTU) Bargaining Team in Richmond California. Learn more below.


Greetings

Unexpectedly, Mumia Abu-Jamal has a shot at freedom.  Judge Lucretia Clemons of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas has ordered the District Attorney’s office to turn over its entire file, up to 200 boxes, to the defense.  

 

Mumia’s lawyers expect to find even further evidence that he was framed, that the police coerced and bribed witnesses, and that conscious racism and judicial bias have permeated all the proceedings against him.  The judge has stated that she will issue a ruling within 60-90 days, roughly Feb.16-Mar. 16.   

 

This is the hour to fight for Mumia’s freedom.  On Feb. 16, longshore workers in ILWU #10 will shut down the Ports of Oakland and San Francisco, holding a stop-work meeting to demand his immediate release.  Teachers in the SF Bay Area are organizing to teach on his case around that same date, Feb. 16, the middle of Black History Month.

 

In less than a week, a delegation from ILWU #10 will travel to a labor conference in South Africa and ask that unions there act again in his defense.   NUMSA, the largest union in South Africa, played a critical role in getting Mumia life-saving medicine when he nearly died from hepatitis. In a letter to Pennsylvania’s then-governor Wolf, it compared Mumia’s medical neglect to the treatment prisoners received under the apartheid regime.

 

We urge you to fight for Mumia’s freedom now.  As a first step, write to Judge Clemons demanding that he be released immediately.  Then take whatever action you can—rallies, workplace meetings, political strikes—to give power to the demand.

Judge Clemons address:

Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
1220 Criminal Justice Center
1301 Filbert Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107
215-683-7020


The judge’s order opening the files came after the filing of an Amicus Brief by the U.N. Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent; a public statement by then-sitting Judge Wendell Griffen of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, Arkansas, that the law requires Judge Clemons to release Mumia immediately;  an outpouring of international labor support; and a letter writing campaign to the judge herself based on the contradiction between her preliminary ruling against Mumia and her statement to the Philadelphia Catholic Archdiocese Racial Healing Commission:  http://bitly.ws/z9Yt


Attached you will find a resolution from adult education teachers, (Download this resolution here) a statement by thePresident of the Vermont AFL-CIO, and a letter from the largest union in the UK, Unite. (screenshot below)


After 41 years in prison, 29 of those on death row, Mumia has a real chance now to win his freedom.  Mobilizing our unions can truly make a difference.  We’re hoping you and your union will join us! 


Please keep us posted on your actions,

In solidarity,  
Bob Mandel,
member, Adult School Teachers United (ASTU) Bargaining Team

 

 

Friday, March 12, 2021

Guantánamo: A US Crime Against Humanity

The American Injustice Industry: Why Shutting Down Guantánamo is Not Enough

Guantanamo detainees. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)

By Ramzy Baroud

RamzyBaroud.net

“That’s certainly our goal and our intention.” This was the non-committal answer given by White House Press Secretary, Jen Psaki, when, on February 12, she was asked by a reporter whether the new Joe Biden Administration intends to shut down the notorious Guantánamo Bay Prison by the end of the president’s first term in office.

Psaki’s answer may have seemed reassuring, that the untold suffering experienced by hundreds of men in this American gulag – many of whom were surely innocent – would be finally coming to an end. However, considering the history of Guantánamo and the trail of broken promises by the Barack Obama Administration, the new administration’s pledge is hardly encouraging.

Compare the new language with that of Obama’s impassioned diatribes about humanity, justice, and American values, which he utilized whenever he spoke of Guantánamo. “Gitmo has become a symbol around the world for an America that flouts the rule of law,” Obama said at a speech at the National Defense University in May 2013.

Enamored with his every word, Obama’s audience clapped with enthusiasm. When he delivered that particular speech, Obama was then serving his second term in office. He already had ample opportunity to shut down the prison which operated with no international monitoring and entirely outside the realms of international and US laws.

Obama is likely to be remembered for his words, not his actions. Not only did he fail to shut down the prison which was erected by his predecessor, George W. Bush, in 2002, but the Guantánamo industry continued to thrive during his terms.

For example, in his speech, Obama made reference to the high cost of “a hundred and fifty million dollars each year to imprison 166 people.” According to the New Yorker, reporting in 2016, Guantánamo’s budget had morphed to “$445 million last year,” when Obama was still in office.

Yet, as the budget grew by leaps and bounds, the number of Guantánamo prisoners dwindled. Currently, there are only 40 prisoners still residing in that massive edifice of metal, concrete and barbed wire located at the eastern tip of Cuba, built atop a piece of land ‘leased’ by the US in 1903.

It is easy to conclude that the US government keeps the prison open only to avoid international accountability and, arguably, to extract information by torture, an act that is inconsistent with American laws. But this cannot be it. On the one hand, the entire wars against Afghanistan and Iraq were illegal under international law.

Such a fact hardly stopped the US and its allies from savagely invading, humiliating and torturing entire populations with no regard whatsoever to legal or moral arguments.

On the other hand, Guantánamo is merely one of many American-run prisons and detention centers throughout the world that operate with no manual of rules and according to the most ruthless tactics. The tragedy of Abu Ghraib, a US military detention center in Baghdad, only became famous when direct evidence of the degrading, and incredibly violent conduct that was taking place within its walls was produced and publicized.

In fact, many American officials and members of Congress at the time used the Abu Ghraib scandal in 2004 as an opportunity to whitewash and rebrand American crimes elsewhere and to present the misconduct in this Iraqi prison as if an isolated incident involving “a few bad apples”.

The ‘few bad apples’ argument, made by G. W. Bush, was, more or less, the same logic utilized by Obama when he championed the closure of Guantánamo. Indeed, both Presidents insisted that neither Abu Ghraib nor Guantánamo should be made out to represent what America is really all about.

“Is this who we are?” Obama animatedly and passionately asked, as he made a case in favor of the closure of Guantánamo, speaking as if a human rights advocate, not a Commander-in-Chief who had direct authority to shut down the entire facility. The truth is that the Abu Ghraib tortures were not ‘a few bad apples’ and Guantánamo is, indeed, a microcosm of exactly what the US is, or has become.

From Bagram, Afghanistan, to Abu Ghraib, Iraq, to Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to the many ‘floating prisons’ –  news of which was leaked by US media in 2014 – the US government continues to make a mockery of international and humanitarian laws. Many American officials, who genuinely advocate the closure of Guantánamo, refuse to acknowledge that the prison is a symbol of their country’s intransigence and refuse to accept that, like any other country in the world, it is accountable to international law.

This lack of accountability has exceeded the US government’s insistence to ‘act alone’, as in to launch wars without international mandates. One US administration after another has also made it clear that, under no circumstances, would they allow accused war criminals to be investigated, let alone stand trial, before the International Criminal Court (ICC). The message here is that even America’s ‘bad apples’ can potentially walk free, regardless of the heinousness of their crimes.

Just months after the Trump Administration imposed sanctions on ICC judges to punish them for the potential investigations of US crimes in Afghanistan, it freed the convicted criminals who carried out horrific crimes in Iraq. On December 22, Trump pardoned four American mercenaries who belonged to the private military firm, Blackwater. These convicted murderers were involved in the killing of 14 civilians, including two children, in Baghdad in 2007.

What became known as the ‘Nisour Square massacre’ was another example of whitewashing, as government officials and mainstream media, though expressing outrage at the unlawful killing, insisted that the massacre was an isolated episode. The fact that hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, mostly civilians, were killed as a result of the American invasion seems irrelevant in the country’s skewed logic in its never-ending ‘war on terror’.

Whether Biden fulfills his promise of shutting down Guantánamo or not, little will change if the US remains committed to its condescending attitude towards international law and to its undeserved view of itself as a country that exists above the universal rights of everyone else.

That said, Guantánamo, on its own, is a crime against humanity and there can never be any justification to rationalize why hundreds of people are held indefinitely, without trial, without due process, without international observers and without ever seeing their families and loved ones. The explanation often offered by the pro-Guantánamo pundits is that the prison inmates are dangerous men. If that was, indeed, the case, why were these supposed criminals not allowed to see their day in court?

According to a report by Amnesty International published in May 2020, of the 779 men who were taken to that facility, “only seven have been convicted.” Worse, five of them were convicted “as a result of pre-trial agreements under which they pleaded guilty, in return for the possibility of release from the base.” According to the rights group, such a trial by ‘military commission’ “did not meet fair trial standards”.

In other words, Guantánamo is – and has always been – a fraudulent operation with no real inclination to holding criminals and terrorists accountable and to preventing further crimes. Instead, Guantánamo is an industry, and a lucrative one. In many ways, it is similar to the American prison military complex, ironically dubbed the ‘criminal justice system.’  Referring to the unjust ‘justice system’, Human Rights Watch derided the US for having “the largest reported prison population in the world”.

“The (US) criminal justice system – from policing and prosecution, through to punishment – is plagued with injustices like racial disparities, excessively harsh sentencing and drug and immigration policies that improperly emphasize criminalization,” HRW stated on its website.

The above, too, can be considered an answer to Obama’s rhetorical question, “Is this who we are?”. Yes, Mr. Obama, in fact, this is precisely who you are.

While offering the world’s most miserable detention conditions to hundreds of potentially innocent men, Guantánamo also offers career opportunities, high military perks and honors, and a seemingly endless budget for a small army to guard only a few shackled, gaunt-looking men in a far-away land.

So, even if Biden is able to overcome pressure from the military, from the CIA, and from Congress to shut Guantánamo down, justice will still be absent, not only because of the numerous lives that are forever shattered but because America still refuses to learn from its mistakes.

(This article first appeared in Politics Today)

– Ramzy Baroud is a journalist and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of five books. His latest is “These Chains Will Be Broken: Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons” (Clarity Press). Dr. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA) and also at the Afro-Middle East Center (AMEC). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net

Monday, June 8, 2020

Black Lives Matter: Jim Crow by stealth

Police detain Ieshia Evans during a protest against police brutality in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on July 9, 2016, days after police shot and killed Alton Sterling. (Reuters/Jonathan Bachman.) Source

by Mark Bygrave - UK trade unionist and Labour party member.
As a result of the civil rights movement from the 1960s onwards, and the shifting cultural outlook of white Americans who had generally moved to the view that overt acts of racism were unacceptable, reforms were introduced which, for a period of time allowed for some increases in living standards for some black US citizens.
A programme of “affirmative action” was also introduced by white liberal politicians, desperate to find a solution to the anger coming out of black communities and to contain it within the capitalist system itself. Although this did bring some material benefits to a minority of black people through education, media, business and other workplaces, where positions were “reserved” for them, it also played into the hands of the right-wing, who weaponized affirmative action amongst white workers, to further sow division. They used the line that “he only got the job because he’s black”, showing that there will never be an end to the bosses trying to divide our class along race lines whilst they wield social and economic power, however much tinkering is attempted.
The ruling class thought they could socially engineer a section of their class to open it up to black and brown people who would then act as apologists and advocates of capitalism and keep the mass of blacks in check. Nowhere is this more exemplified than by people like Candace Owens who are part of the Trump media offensive to give black cover to the white ruling class and try split US blacks along class lines. Owens effectively blames African-Americans for their own predicament, and “bad choices”, all the while refusing to acknowledge the objective conditions that the vast majority of blacks are born into. In the UK we see comments along a similar vein from the likes of Labour MP David Lammy and former head of the commission for racial equality  who never once raises the issue of class and only ever talk about tinkering and reforms of a system that has racism hardwired into its DNA that will ultimately do nothing for the mass of people, but may advance the careers of a select few.
What is systemic racism?
In the US it is the system of mass incarceration that underpins racism in US capitalism. Mass incarceration effectively replaced the Jim Crow segregation laws and was begun by Nixon, using the “southern strategy” and then put into full effect by Reagan in his now infamous “war on drugs”. Billions of federal dollars were offered to state and local law enforcement, on the condition it was used in the “drug war”, which became a euphemism for terrorising and criminalising black communities.
The stealth of this system is that its supposed to be “colourblind” and only goes after “criminals” but everyone knows the colour of the person a politician is talking about when they refer to a “criminal” is the USA 
In fact, when Reagan started his drug campaign, the majority of white Americans did not even view drugs as a major issue. It was jobs and health that were the main issues for white Americans, but US capitalism was not able to address these, given the world economic situation at the time. So neo-liberal policies were introduced to transfer public money into private hands, to increase profitability for capital together with huge tax cuts for the rich to kick start a boom paid for by the poorest sections of US society mainly black and brown people. 
Supported by media depictions of black men as pimps, dealers and rapists, the ruling class set about de-humanising black people with negative stereotypes prevalent throughout white American TV, newspapers, movies and news reports.
All studies show that drug use was and remains pretty near equal amongst whites as it is blacks, but white kids had nothing to fear in the suburbs if they happened to be found in possession of small amounts of cannabis after Reagan’s declaration of war.
Moralizing and hand-wringing
In contrast, in black communities we saw young black males arrested, charged, convicted or imprisoned at alarmingly high rates and then being ripped from their families, devastating community ties and foundations.
We then had to listen to the moralising hand-wringing of white commentators in mainstream media, talking about absent fathers and the lack of moral guidance denied to black children, and suggesting that black fathers were ‘feckless’, whilst all the time ignoring the destruction of families through racist law enforcement, poverty and underfunded education.
Police were given powers to stop and search, even though the 4th Amendment was specifically written to prevent unlawful search and seizure. Various challenges were made even all the way to the Supreme Court, but a “drugs exception” is now implicit, even though it is not specifically written anywhere in the 4th Amendment. The supreme court judges have effectively given the green light to racist stop-and-search and allowed a branch of law enforcement to define the constitutional rights of citizens.
The threat of death is inherent in every police stop
Once stopped by the police, the nightmare for any black person really begins. If they question the stop, protest or resist in any way, the police will use brute force, then pile on trumped-up charges, like assaulting an officer or resisting arrest, and the pretext to be taken to jail is achieved. If this is not bad enough, the threat of death by cops is inherent in every situation when a black person is stopped. A cop only has to say he felt his life was threatened to use deadly force.
The nightmare of a criminal justice system that is so weighted against poor people is then shown in full glare. Too poor to have a lawyer and with a token public defender system so underfunded and overworked that it means anyone arrested is faced with staying in jail or trying to get bail.
The bail system is then the next hurdle where you are expected to raise surety for thousands of dollars through family or friends, which is a near impossibility. Contrast that with the case of Epstein, who was in jail arrested on suspicion of sex with minors and who was released on bail within four hours.
So the pressure to get out of a stinking jail is applied by the prosecutor's office, where the DA has so much power to intimidate and extract a confession or plea deal it becomes clear that the pursuit of ‘justice’ is non-existent. If you try to plead ‘not guilty’ and want to go to court, the DA can effectively threaten to escalate and add more charges, without any evidence. So you can enter the system on a charge that carries, say, 3 months prison and end up being faced with more serious charges that carry 20 years, if found guilty. Is it any surprise that most people cave in and take a plea deal, especially if faced with legal fees they cannot afford and continued incarceration?
Vast majority of charges never go to court
In around 97% of convictions, the person charged never sees the inside of a courtroom, except to agree to the deal with a judge. It is openly acknowledged by both defence and prosecutors in the US that if every person arrested actually demanded a court appearance to fight their charges, then the system would collapse, such is the number of people charged at any one time.
It is clear that the legal system, in terms of the experiences of poor people and especially black and brown caught up in it, is not the ‘pursuit of justice’. The aim is to get a conviction and for the arrestee to be criminalised for life and then to be excluded from mainstream society. What is this, if not segregation or Jim Crow by the back door?
Another step taken by Republicans and Democrats was to introduce mandatory sentencing, effectively removing the discretion of judges to look at the individual circumstances of the perpetrator and the crime itself and decide on sentencing. Now it became possible to receive a sentence for minor drug offences that was longer than for violent crimes. It was not unheard-of to be sentenced to life for a first-time offence.
In 1982, a Supreme Court ruling upheld forty years of imprisonment for possession in a case involving an attempt to sell 9 ounces of cannabis, and several years later the same Supreme Court upheld a sentence of life for defendant with no prior convictions who attempted to sell 23 ounces of cocaine. The 8th Amendment is supposed to protect citizens from “cruel and unusual” punishments, but once again ,there appears to be an exception for black people.
Is it any wonder that the vast majority of black people feel alienated, disconnected and unwelcome in the country of their birth? The constitution and the American dream are entirely meaningless to them.
Weapons, vehicles and surveillance equipment
The “war on drugs” allowed federal money to be showered on police  to purchase weapons, vehicles, surveillance equipment and anything else the police wanted. Within a few years police became completely dependent upon this funding which was only renewed if convictions and arrests continued to rise, so a perpetual cycle of mass arrests whilst cuts to social programmes were continued causing immense pain to families who were nearly all just trying to get by in some of the toughest neighbourhoods in the world. And so began the school to prison pipeline - a deliberate and constructed system to criminalise as many black youth as possible creating a cycle of deprivation and self fulfilling crime stats justifying further budget increases for the police.
New laws were also introduced, whereby police could seize assets and property, even if they only suspected it was from the proceeds of the drug trade. It wasn't long before law enforcement had a perpetual motivation to keep the war on drugs going to provide an ever-expanding flow of money into their departments.
In most US cities, the police budgets are more than all of those provided for social services put together, only emphasising the priorities of the capitalist class towards the black population.
This means that simultaneously there were police round-ups mass arrests alongside the defunding of schools, cuts to social services and other welfare programmes. A harsh collateral punishment was introduced where tenants could be evicted from public housing if a family member was convicted, so the damage and terror was not confined to just the arrestee and widened out to catch even more innocent poor people.
Prison system a multi-billion dollar business
The USA has 5% of the world's population, yet holds 25% of the world's prison population. Black males make up 4% of the US population but are around 40% of that prison population.  The prison system itself is now a multi-billion dollar business, where private companies have monetised every aspect of incarceration to profit off the backs of inmates, including forced labour for many well-known product brands, meals and phone calls for inmates, along with ancillary services and other profitable revenue streams.
Mass incarceration is making billions for the largest corporations in America whilst impoverishing black people.
Let us also not forget that once convicted of a felony in the USA and prison time is served, this is not, as one would expect, the end of the sentence. A convicted felon enters a parallel universe in which discrimination and stigma are legal. This also applies to people who accepted a plea deal and a felony conviction in return for not going to prison. In fact, the majority of convicted felons have not served prison time.
A 2008 study showed there were a shocking 2.3 million people in prisons and jails but a staggering 5.1 million under some form of “community correctional supervision”. Every single job application in the US requires the applicant to tick a box if they are a convicted felon. This all but excludes most people from obtaining even a basic minimum wage job and ever returning to society; it also prevents rehabilitation, so the cycle of petty crime – just to survive – is repeated, ultimately resulting, in many cases, in a return to prison.
In the 80s and 90s, both the Republican and to their shame, that ‘friend of the workers’ the Democratic Party, in efforts to outdo each other on being “tough on crime” agreed ever-more draconian post-felony release sanctions.
In almost all states a convicted felon cannot even get food stamps, cannot get public housing and with parole officers who provide no support and are just used as a force for social control. A convicted felon will be discriminated against quite legally by private landlords and forever denied licences for a wide range of professional bodies, resulting forever being locked out of mainstream society.
A felony sentence means permanent exclusion
Once on parole, you are subject to regular surveillance and monitoring and you may be stopped and searched, without consent, at any time. Is it any wonder that once somebody enters this world where the normal rules of citizenship do not apply there is a high rate of return to prison?
The US bureau of statistics shows that 30% of released prisoners were re-arrested within six months of release. Within three years, nearly 68% were rearrested for at least one offence.
This is the aim of mass incarceration and the criminalisation of the black community and is Jim Crow by stealth, reinvented and rebranded to hide its nature from white America because it is acknowledged that in 21st century even amongst whites, the idea of living in a racist society is abhorrent. So the ruling class have had to develop, evolve and rebrand their system of control of the black population and made it “colourblind” and pretend its only aim is to go after “criminals” to fool middle class white America.
More African-Americans adults are under correctional control today – in prison or jail, on probation or parole – than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.
In contemporary USA, it is not an exaggeration to describe the vast majority of black neighbourhoods as similar to the ‘Bantustans’ of Apartheid South Africa. The murder of the jogger Ahmaud Abery by white men who planned a lynching because a black man dared to run through “their” neighbourhood, gives an insight into how African Americans are forced to stay only where whites decide they should belong.
It's generally viewed that one of the roles of the police is to act as border guards, keeping black people in their zones and enforcing an unofficial travel ban to white neighbourhoods.
Systemic racism highlights that as important as it is to draw attention to the appalling bias in jobs, income and financial standing, it extends beyond the basic economic indices. African Americans live with the knowledge that there are some white citizens, especially the police, who would have no hesitation in killing them, because they know the justice system will almost always find a way to get them off.
This is clearly an attempt to divide workers in a “culture war” where if you are white you are expected to take the side of one ‘your own’ tribe. This must be resisted by all activists and by the Labour and trade union leaders. Quite rightly, the vast majority of our class are appalled by racism, but at the same time, very few are aware of what institutional or systemic racism actually consists of.
Heroism of youth on the streets
Important discussions about the role of the police have begun amongst the radicalised youth taking part in the uprisings in the US and as socialists we must intervene in these discussions. The role of the police in society has been exposed as a force for social control, not fighting crime.
In the US, even the police themselves acknowledge that they have been used as the “go to” organisation for the consequences of social issues, deprivation, underfunding of services and poverty that are not policing matters; from stray dogs and minor disagreements, through to far more serious social and health issues like drugs, unemployment, overcrowded housing. For too long, the stock answer has been “call the cops” and white America has been happy to go along with it.
The funding of the police must be subject to far more scrutiny where the workload of police could actually be reduced significantly if money was spent on services like mental health and drug rehabilitation programmes. Investment could be diverted to youth training and education programmes, but most of all, the so called “war on drugs” must end and be replaced with policing by consent with full democratic accountability at state, city and local level by means of elected democratic organs, where citizens can determine policy, operational guidelines and fully direct the work of the police.
We must listen to the youth and workers and encourage establishment of socialist education groups where the gap between unorganised workers and trade unions can be bridged.
The workers in the mighty US trade union movement must take inspiration from the heroism of those youth on the streets and be at the forefront of some bridge-building, by making links at grassroots level, inviting speakers to their local meetings for example. 
We have already seen examples of how unionised workers can support the struggle e.g. bus drivers in NYC refusing to assist transporting arrested demonstrators.
Union members must look at their own leaderships, who have continually sought conciliation and collaboration with the same people who support mass incarceration and they must break with any illusions that the Democrat Party or the capitalist system can provide social peace, economic prosperity or stability for any worker black or white.
We will fight for and will welcome any minor reforms this uprising may bring the workers of the US. But the capitalist will try to take any concessions back again sometime in the future. In the U.S, we are seeing a movement of the working class developing that is confronting racism and the murder of the black population by the police. It is inevitable that the capitalist system itself will come under fire as well. In this ongoing struggle a major goal must be the creation of a political alternative to the two capitalist parties, a workers’ party based on the unions and working class communities. This will give us a place to fight for our own class interests and strengthen the struggle for permanent change which will allow African Americans, Latinos and all POC to determine their own destiny. 
The ruling class are now relying on the Democratic Party to absorb this new wave of anger, with Obama and Pelosi both exploiting the situation to get Biden into power. The ‘lesser of two evils’ raises its head again in US politics, so we must agitate for a workers’ party, which, if established and armed with a socialist programme, would be unstoppable in a challenge for power and become a beacon to the world working class.
The US in 2020 has entered the world stage as one the opening episodes of the unfolding world revolution inspiring outpourings of solidarity in Paris, Berlin London and other cities around the globe. The internationalism of workers to the plight of our black brothers and sister is real and concrete and should fill us with optimism for the struggle that is about to unfold in the coming period
No Justice No peace!
For a Socialist USA, a socialist American continent and a Socialist World!
Postscript: This is an excerpt from the book, The New Jim Crow - Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colourblindness by Michelle Alexander 
“Jarvious Cotton cannot vote. Like his father, grandfather, great-grandfather, and great-great-grandfather, he has been denied the right to participate in our electoral democracy. Cotton’s family tree tells the story of several generations of black men who were born in the United States but who were denied the most basic freedom that democracy promises—the freedom to vote for those who will make the rules and laws that govern one’s life. Cotton’s great-great-grandfather could not vote as a slave. His great-grandfather was beaten to death by the Ku Klux Klan for attempting to vote. His grandfather was prevented from voting by Klan intimidation. His father was barred from voting by poll taxes and literacy tests. Today, Jarvious Cotton cannot vote because he, like many black men in the United States, has been labeled a felon and is currently on parole.”
June 6, 2020