Wednesday, September 9, 2026

The Dover Blockade: Masked Men Blocking Streets Oswald Mosely Would Be Proud.

 Ed Murray

 




Thanks to John Lister for sharing

Ed Murray on Facebook

9-5-26


I don’t particularly want to get serious on a Saturday night, but the bellends in Dover have p***ed me off. Watching a bunch of numpties in balaclavas block roads, intimidate people and then lecture everyone else about who is supposedly threatening British values is just f***ing ridiculous. The hypocrisy would be funny if the whole thing wasn’t so ugly.

 

Half my ancestors were Litvak Jews. Around 90–95% of that community was murdered by the Nazis. Britain was one of the places people could flee to, and the fact that this country offered refuge from persecution is something we ought to be proud of.

 

So watching masked men complain that Muslim women shouldn’t be allowed to cover their faces is f***ing absurd. Complaining that Muslims are “intimidating” while standing in the road in balaclavas intimidating strangers isn’t patriotism. It’s hypocrisy.

 

And underneath all of this is the oldest trick going: persuade people with very little that their problems are caused by people with even less. Fill their feeds with rage about migrants, Muslims and refugees, and they’ll spend their time punching down instead of looking up.

 

These guys aren’t rebels. They’re sheep. They are a dream come true for extremely rich and powerful people who would much rather have ordinary people raging at penniless migrants than asking awkward questions about wealth, tax, power and who is actually running the country.

 

If they genuinely think Britain’s problems are being caused by the people arriving here with virtually nothing, they haven’t seen through the system.


They’ve been played by it.

 

British Jews are being made less safe by chief rabbi Ephraim Mirvis, not Ed Miliband

 British Jews are being made less safe by chief rabbi Ephraim Mirvis, not Ed Miliband

Mirvis confirms the antisemites’ worst assumptions when he keeps confusing Jews with Israel and using his influence to protect Israel from ever being held accountable for its crimes

Finally someone in high public office has had the nerve to state the obvious: that Britain’s Orthodox chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, is talking complete nonsense. Sadly, no one in the media seems ready to listen to Ed Miliband, the UK’s foreign secretary.

Mirvis is one of Israel’s most visible and influential cheerleaders in the UK. He has described Israeli troops serving in Gaza as “our heroic soldiers”, apparently misunderstanding that his job is to represent British, not Israeli, Jews. 

The confusion may have arisen, in part, because, as Mirvis himself has admitted, one of his sons, Danny, served in the Israeli military during its three-year onslaught on Gaza.


And then there is the matter of Mirvis declaring in early 2024, weeks into Israel’s genocide in Gaza, that the slaughter of what was then at least 23,000 Palestinians – most of them civilians – was “the most outstanding possible thing”.

Among his other, many connections to Israel through family, he lived in an illegal Jewish settlement in the West Bank in the 1970s while studying at a seminary. 

By any reasonable yardstick, the man charged with providing religious counsel to British Jews is far from a dispassionate observer of things Israel-related. His conflict of interest is probably visible from outer space. 

Yet, when Miliband set out the British government’s slightly tougher line on Israel’s illegal settlements this week – through a trade ban that will be difficult to enforce and that his officials have reportedly said will, in any case, be “largely symbolic” – none of this context about Mirvis was mentioned by the very establishment media outlets that are only too eager to quote him. Which is all of them. 

It is unclear what expertise the chief rabbi has on the matter of Britain’s diplomatic relations with Israel, or on the legality of the settlements devouring the West Bank and any future Palestinian state. 

But what he apparently he does have is an uncommon insight into the thinking of non-Jews. And usefully, at least for Israel, it seems that Rabbi Mirvis knows that implementing a very limited ban on the UK’s trade with Israel’s illegal settlements will unleash a new wave of antisemitism, endangering the safety of Britain’s Jewish population.

Or as Mirvis put it in a statement on social media, the UK’s sanctions are a “dark day for British Jews”, and will apparently embolden people to “use hatred as a weapon against Jews”.

It is hard not to miss a running theme with the chief rabbi’s pronouncements. Anything that threatens to limit Israel’s room for manoeuvre in committing atrocities against Palestinians will, says Mirvis, make British Jews less safe – for reasons that are never explained, and about which interviewers are always, and strangely, incurious. 

Mirvis, of course, is not used to receiving even the mildest pushback from politicians or the media. Why? Because we can presume they are deeply fearful of being labelled antisemitic for questioning the rabbi’s divinely inspired insights into non-Jewish behaviour. 

So Mirvis must have been startled to hear, as Miliband was asked incredulously by BBC Radio Four’s Today programme whether the chief rabbi was wrong, the foreign secretary retort: Yes, I am saying I don’t agree with the chief rabbi.“ 

Miliband – and behind him, Prime Minister Andy Burnham – doubtless hope that the foreign secretary can pull off this kind of rhetorical duel with the chief rabbi because Miliband has a possible get-out-of-jail card: he is as Jewish as Mirvis. 

Had Miliband not been, one can assume the media would already be clamouring for his sacking – and his departure into political exile alongside former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. 

Nonetheless, Miliband’s Jewishness may not offer complete immunity. He still risks being proclaimed the “wrong sort of Jew”. Which may explain why he hurriedly added, after criticising Mirvis, that the rabbi was “somebody over whom I have great respect.” 

Understandably, the BBC’s Justin Webb was not placated. To avoid facing accusations of antisemitism himself for failing to roast Miliband sufficiently, Webb pressed on that Miliband might not be taking Mirvis’ warning seriously enough given that he did not attend synagogue.

So, it seems, Miliband is indeed the wrong sort of Jew. “Wrong” in the sense that he refuses to conflate his Jewish identity with Israel. “Wrong” in the sense that he regards human rights as universal, not an expression of dominance by one ethnic group over another. “Wrong” in the sense that he refuses to weaponise his Jewishness to silence criticism of Israel. 

Yet once again, care of the BBC, Rabbi Mirvis got his way – as, of course, did Israel. 

Abandoning the discussion of why Israel might need to be sanctioned over its war crimes in the West Bank – let alone its unmentionable genocide in Gaza – Miliband was forced on to the back foot. 

He used what valuable air time was left to him to restate the same platitudes demanded by the Israel lobby every time Israel comes in for the faintest scrutiny. He told the Today programme: “Antisemitism is a scourge and an evil … I want Jews, I want people of all faiths and none to feel safe in our country.” 

What did not get examined – what never gets examined – was the deeply flawed premise of Mirvis’ claim that British Jews would be made less safe by the UK sanctioning illegal Israeli settlements engaged in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. 

The reality, it should barely need stating, is likely to be the very opposite. 

The worst antisemites – the kind that, like Mirvis, confuse Jews with Israel and are therefore most likely to carry out attacks on Jews in response to crimes committed by Israel – hold a set of beliefs entirely incompatible with what Miliband has just done.

They believe a cabal of Jews – and through them, Israel – control our governments. They believe that this Jewish cabal controls the media too. They are certain the British government is incapable of making its own decisions and of punishing Israel. 

Every time Rabbi Mirvis and the Israel lobby get their way; every time a journalist bows unquestioningly before Rabbi Mirvis and the Israel lobby; every time a government minister crumbles in the face of pressure from Rabbi Mirvis and the Israel lobby; such antisemites become more hardened in their certainty that they are right. They grow more sure that the only hope of bringing about change is by taking the fight to ordinary Jews as they go about their lives. That is why they attack Jews on street corners, in cafes, and in synagogues. 

The rest of us understand that it is not a cabal of Jews running the world. It is rather a dark cabal of billionaires and corporations that have used their immense wealth to buy our “democracies” so that they can amass even greater wealth. Those billionaires own the establishment media – the window through which we are made to understand the world – so they can shape our minds to win our compliance. And they distract us from this reality – and further enrich themselves – by confecting endless enemies that can only be defeated by the mammoth war industries they also own. 

The truth – though one no one dares admit it – is that, if anyone is making life less safe for British Jews, it is not Ed Miliband. It is the actions of Chief Rabbi Mirvis.

U.S. Finds A War It’s Willing to Declare

 U.S. Finds A War It’s Willing to Declare

New government logo chooses violence

Official seal of DHS — until now

Fundraising fell off a cliff this summer. Not accepting a dime in corporate ad money allows me to be genuinely independent; but it also means I’m ENTIRELY dependent on readers like you to survive. Please become a paid subscriber (or chip in via my GoFundMe here) to keep this newsletter going — Ken

The Department of Homeland Security has decided that the agency needs a new official seal. Where the ubiquitous American eagle faced the direction of the olive branches in its right talon, now the eagle will face the opposite direction — towards the arrows it clasps in its other talon.

“We’re actually changing our seal to make it look towards the arrows because … when it looks towards the arrows is when it means we’re at war,” Secretary Markwayne Mullin revealed in a Fox News interview this weekend. “Homeland Security is at war every single day against bad actors trying to hurt our backyards, and we’re not gonna allow that to happen.”

So in other words, the United States is at war here at home — but Iran somehow isn’t a war. What?

In October 1945, seven weeks after the Japanese surrender in World War II, President Harry Truman issued Executive Order 9646, the first order in American history to define the great seal in legal language, with the eagle’s head codified as facing toward the olive branch. Truman said it was to reflect the new world of peace. Churchill quipped: “Why not put the eagle’s neck on a swivel so that it could turn to the right or left as the occasion presented itself?”

Nearly a century later, Churchill’s vision won out.

“ If you look at most of our seals throughout all the agencies, the eagle looks to the palm leaf because that’s in a time of peace,” Mullin said in the interview.

Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin

If anything, Mullin is underselling the significance. All federal agencies’ seals depict the peacetime eagle facing the palm leaf, not just “most.” And not only has Homeland never before depicted the wartime posture (not even after 9/11) — no U.S. agency has since World War II. Not even the “Department of War”! 

There’s something very creepy about our government seeing America as a battlefield in ways it doesn’t even see overseas.

“The Department of Homeland Security seal was created in June 2003 and is symbolic of the Department’s mission — to prevent attacks and protect Americans — on the land, in the sea and in the air,” DHS officially says of the now obsolete eagle. The meaning was pretty straightforward: protect America from external threats.

Which raises the question of who, exactly, DHS believes itself to be at war with. Mullin’s public answer is the standard list — Islamic terrorists, cartels, weapons of mass destruction, etc. — but he keeps returning to the war being against Americans domestically.

“Free speech is something we all protect, but there’s a line that you can cross that goes from free speech to inciting dangerous behavior; and we have to attack that dangerous behavior at every turning point,” Mullin told Fox News.

This war against free speech is not just rhetoric. The federal government is increasingly monitoring what Americans say, particularly on social media, and it is increasingly building AI tools to monitor everything and flag what it considers threatening or offensive for further investigation.

FBI Deputy Director Christopher Raia recently revealed key details of the machinery behind this in a little-noticed interview this weekend.

Of dangerous speech, he says: “Obviously, huge uptick the last year, 18 months, in political violence, political rhetoric, government violence, crime against the government — you name it, whether it’s FBI agents, ICE agents, congressmen on both sides of the aisle.”

FBI Deputy Director Christopher Raia

The FBI is combatting this, Raia says, with National Security Presidential Memorandum 7, which I’ve explained here

NSPM-7, signed by Trump last September, directs the federal government to disrupt “organized political violence” — and lists, among the indicators that someone might be inclined toward it, “anti-Americanism,” “anti-capitalism,” “anti-Christianity,” and “extremism on migration, race, and gender.” In other words, speech.

If you have any doubts about whether it’s really war, listen to Raia compare the methodology of NSPM-7 and its newly created “Joint Mission Center” to external (non) war:

“You’re familiar with the way that we worked the Iranian threat. We kinda did the same thing the way we worked the Iranian threat, and we applied it to this threat.”

Think about that for a sec. The bureau’s response to Iran’s domestic pot-stirring has entailed network mapping, informant recruitment, financial tracing, FISA collection, and pretextual interviews designed to rattle a target and see what falls out. It was built to counter the clandestine operations of a foreign adversary.

Now, this apparatus is being pointed at Americans.

And it has been staffed accordingly. Raia describes pulling personnel out of the divisions that normally have nothing to do with one another:

“There are pieces of this threat that encompasses our criminal division. There are pieces of this threat that encompasses the cyber division. There’s pieces that encompass CT [counterterrorism], even CI [counterintelligence], believe it or not. So we took bodies from all these different divisions. We put them under one roof, so to speak. … And then we’ve added, of course, our partners at HSI [homeland security investigations, which I detailed here], Department of Treasury, IRS, and we have them all sitting in the same space.”

NSPM-7 directs the government to go after funders of Antifa, the left, and general protest on the part of the American people. This in practice means nonprofits and their donors.

Raia says that the Joint Mission Center is finding its footing:

“So we’ve seen that mature over the last seven or eight months that I’ve been here from a concept to really starting to hit their stride and really starting to attack these entities that wanna do violence against the government, wanna do violence to the politicians.”

The Center, Raia says, is ramping up its activity to investigate and bring criminal charges against those engaged in “cyberstalking” and “interstate” threats, known in the FBI as an “875” investigation because of a federal criminal statute that prohibits transmitting threats, extortion, or ransom demands. Applauding the willingness of U.S. Attorneys to bring charges against social media posters, Raia says, “I gotta give kudos where kudos is due,” remarking that it was impossible to get such a charge five years ago.

Here’s how Raia put it:

 “Good luck trying to get an 875 charge from a US attorney, you know, five, 10 years ago. We're really getting a lot of support from our partners in DOJ and the US Attorney's Office in going after these folks. And whether it's a cyberstalking charge, whether it's 875 interstate threat charge — really getting a lot of buy-in from the US Attorney's Office and putting a lot of these folks behind bars.”

Anecdotally, I’ve heard of a lot of cases of people getting door-knocks for spicy social media posts.

None of them have been charged with anything. Yet. Now that the Eagle is armed though, the American symbol of freedom is getting its own thought-seeking missile. We all know who is standing downrange.

Fundraising fell off a cliff this summer. Not accepting a dime in corporate ad money allows me to be genuinely independent; but it also means I’m ENTIRELY dependent on readers like you to survive. Please become a paid subscriber (or chip in via my GoFundMe here) to keep this newsletter going — Ken

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Hamas Offered to Release all Civilian Hostages on Day 1 - without Preconditions. Israel Said No

Hamas Offered to Release all Civilian Hostages on Day 1 - without Preconditions. Israel Said No. 

I joined the LeftHook to discuss the bombshell story about Netanyahu ignoring warnings about Oct 7, the UK imposing sanctions on Israel - and why a third round of US/Israel-Iran war is likely  

From Trita Parsi on Substack


Wajahat Ali had me on his amazing Substack show - The Left Hook - today to discuss three major stories: The blockbuster by Haaretz that Netanyahu had ignored a major warning by the ruler of the UAE that Hamas was planning an “earthquake” attack on Israel and that Netanyahu had rejected an offer by Hamas the day after October 7 to - without preconditions - release all civilian hostages, as well as the UK’s new sanctions on Israeli settlements and why I think a new round of war between the US/Israel and Iran is very likely. 

You can watch the 30 min segment above, but let me just spell out one of the points I made in the interview: The Biden administration was well aware of the Hamas offer to release all the civilian hostages - and of Netanyahu’s rejection of the offer. Biden administration officials pressed Netanyahu gently to accept the offer. But once Netanyahu rejected it, Biden officials completely shifted and justified all measures Israel took - including blatant war crimes such as bombing hospitals - by pointing to the hostages in Hamas’s custody, knowing very well that a majority of them could have been released on day one. So many hostages died while being held by Hamas - or were held far longer - due to Netanyahu’s decision and the Biden administration’s complicity. 

Remember, Biden was not passively going along with Netanyahu’s fatal decision. The US vetoed six UN Security Council resolutions and provided all kinds of economic and political support for Netanyahu’s policy - even though they knew that the civilian hostages remained in Gaza because Netanyahu preferred it that way. 

To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Monday, September 7, 2026

Israel: A horrific expose on the murder of Palestinian prisoner Tha'er Abu Assab.


Shaiel Ben-Ephraim

 

A horrific expose on the murder of Palestinian prisoner Tha'er Abu Assab, a Palestinian prisoner at Ketziot prison by guards in November 2023 appeared in Haaretz today. 


Among the most damning evidence in the case are the texts of one warden, Oshrit Aliga, who as you can see in the video inlcuded here was literally the poster child for the Israeli Prison Services. Here are the texts verbatim: 

 

Abu Assad

On the night Tha'er Abu Assab, was murdered, she texted a friend: "Sweetie, here is an update for you, he's dead now." She added that she was "very happy and satisfied, but it's a mess right now. There was a lot of blood and they broke them."

 

WhatsApp exchange with her friend, December 2023:

"They brought some Amalek-son whores down in the middle of the street, sitting there on the ground with just underwear and blindfolds on. I'm already getting myself and the shift ready to receive them for Shabbat, we will give them a proper Shabbat reception." 

 

Responding to her friend's joke about her baton: "My club is fine, after a fair number of disinfections."

"Imagine me and you in a cell with two prisoners cuffed hand to hand, and the shift commander tells us 'go ahead, cut loose', sweetie, I swear you'd have enjoyed it here with me."

 

When her friend asked if she physically hits them: "I wish I had a way to prove it to you, to show you something, I swear to you, sis, I break them apart. You've never known me like this. [This is] routine. [When the] next round comes, if I haven't cracked one of his kidneys, as far as I'm concerned I'm not going into the wing."

 

WhatsApp exchange with her domestic partner, corrections officer Tamer Trudi, same month:

"We got another 70 whores from October 7th. Each one of course got a personal welcome, and some got a joint one because of the [limited] supply of handcuffs."

 

After Trudi replied "Haha, how nice that there's always a welcome": "And since we were already tired from hitting them, the commander took off his belt and undid it on them. And the screaming , like females — at minimum they're a punching bag."

 

Watch the video to see her enthusiastic physical training that allows her to murder and torture inmates. She has not been charged.

Friday, September 4, 2026

An Anti-Requiem for Gloria Steinem, A Cold War Icon




 

An Anti-Requiem for Gloria Steinem, A Cold War Icon

March 25, 1934,- September 2, 2026

 

Sarah Raymundo *

 

As the media machine prepares to unleash a flood of fawning tributes, the usual suspects will inevitably honor Gloria Steinem—a spectacle revealing little about liberation and everything about their own bankrupt politics, brazen opportunism, willful blindness to historical fact, and the hackneyed claims to "complexity" and "nuance" held so dear by these intellectual mercenaries.

 

How does one assess a life after it ends? Those who benefit and are in a good position in this system will honor Gloria Steinem for contributing to stabilizing a system oppressive to many and dis-aligning them from revolutionary ideas—this is not what women want and need.

 

The death of Gloria Steinem will undoubtedly unleash an avalanche of sanitized obituaries, performative tributes, and ruling-class hagiography. Western media will mourn her as a "groundbreaking icon" and a pioneer for gender equality. But for the global majority—the millions of women across the Third World and the working-class masses who remain crushed beneath the boot of imperialist exploitation—her passing marks the end of a legacy that fundamentally weaponized feminist rhetoric to protect the empire. 

 

Steinem did not liberate women; she weaponized women’s liberation to serve the interests of U.S. hegemony. The foundational sin of her career was never a mere footnote: her early leadership of the CIA-backed Independent Research Service in the late 1950s and 1960s was explicitly designed to undermine anti-imperialist, socialist, and communist youth movements at international youth festivals. When exposed, Steinem didn’t apologize; she defended the covert arm of the U.S. imperialism, describing its operatives as "liberal and honorable." This was not an innocent blunder of youth, but the blueprint for her entire career.

 

Through Ms. magazine and her manufactured status as the singular, polished face of "second-wave feminism," Steinem pioneered a dangerous model of liberal counter-insurgency. As radical feminists, Black panthers, and anti-capitalist women were rising up to demand the dismantling of the triad of imperialism, white supremacy, and capitalism, Steinem offered a palatable alternative: bourgeois, reformist faux feminism.

 

This imperial feminism detached gender oppression from its economic and geopolitical roots. It told American women that liberation meant climbing corporate ladders, breaking glass ceilings inside warmongering state institutions, and achieving parity within an exploitative system—all while the very empire housing them carpet-bombed, starved, and destabilized nations across the Global South. By framing patriarchy as an abstract cultural enemy separate from class struggle and US military domination, her brand of activism effectively depoliticized the feminist movement and severed its solidarity with anti-imperialist struggles worldwide.

 

It was precisely this co-optation that radical groups like Redstockings rightly called out in 1975. They recognized Ms. magazine and Steinem’s elevated media stature as a parallel organization meant to channel radical anger into benign electoral politics. When challenged on her intelligence connections and corporate backing, her apparatus used legal threats and publishing pressure to suppress internal dissent, silencing the very radical women whose ideas she had watered down and monetized.

 

For the global majority, Steinem’s legacy is not one of freedom, but of co-optation. Her pro-imperialist ideology gave feminist cover to U.S. soft power, making Western liberal democracy look progressive while its economic structures continued to siphon labor and resources from women in Latin America, Africa, and Asia. She normalized a brand of identity politics that allows female CEOs, drone operators, and politicians to be celebrated as triumphs for "womanhood," even as their actions inflict violence on millions of impoverished women globally.

 

We must refuse the myth-making that surrounds her death. True liberation for women will never come from the handshakes of CIA handlers, corporate sponsors, or ruling-class media elites. It will come from the destruction of the imperialist, capitalist structures that Steinem worked so tirelessly to legitimize. Her death should serve as a stark reminder: a feminism that aligns itself with the empire is no feminism at all—it is merely the soft edge of oppression. 

 

*Sarah Raymundo is assistant professor at the Center for International Studies, University of the Philippines. She is the international liaison officer of Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (New Patriotic Alliance) and chairperson of the Philippines-Bolivarian Venezuela Friendship Association. She is a columnist for Bulatlat, an alternative online news publication in the Philippines. https://pcp.gc.cuny.edu/person/sarah-raymundo/

 

  

Ilan Pappe' at the Oxford Union. This is How You Fight Anti-Semitism, not defending Israel.


From the source:

"Historian Ilan Pappé argues against the motion that Israel has ever genuinely sought peace with the Palestinians during an Oxford Union debate. Pappé presents Zionism as a colonial project, arguing that its establishment and continuation involved violence, coercion and British imperial support. 

He also describes modern Israel as an apartheid state, citing assessments by human rights organisations, and argues that Palestinian demands for democracy and self-determination were systematically suppressed, culminating in what he describes as the ethnic cleansing of 1948. 

Pappé concludes by urging the audience to reject the idea that Israel has sought peace and frames the issue as a moral choice over whether to remain complicit or stand on what he calls the “right side of history”. The claims and characterisations in this video reflect Pappé’s arguments during the debate."

Here is Ilan Pappe's book on the history of Zionist occupation and ethnic cleansing in Palestine.



Thursday, September 3, 2026

Ken Klippenstein: Nonbinary Gender Extremism?

 Nonbinary Gender Extremism?

The White House has a new target. But who’s the real extremist? Ken Klippenstein Sept 3 2026

Sebastian Gorka

Fundraising fell off a cliff this summer. Not accepting a dime in corporate ad money allows me to be genuinely independent; but it also means I’m ENTIRELY dependent on readers like you to survive. Please become a paid subscriber (or chip in via my GoFundMe here) to keep this newsletter going — Ken

I am baffled that White House counterterrorism czar Sebastian Gorka gets so little attention from the media.

It isn’t for lack of material, which is a rare blend of both cry-laugh funny and substantively alarming. Gorka is like a theater kid version of Henry Kissinger, the same inflated ego but with a flair for the flamboyant: bragging he’s stacking terrorist bodies “like cordwood” after receiving "eternal justice" from the Trump admin’s "hammers of hell”; his convertible with a vanity plate “ART WAR” in reference to Sun Tzu; the Hercule Poirot pocket squares and mustachios. 

Amusing as it all is, the theatrics are in service of a worldview that regards just about anyone who might look out of place in his beloved Hungary (where his parents are from) as some kind of threat to Western civilization. 

The Trump administration has already sought to stigmatize transgender people as a hotbed of violent extremism, as I reported on last year. The U.S. government’s official national counterterrorism strategy, authored by Gorka earlier this year, explicitly mentions “extreme gender ideologies” as an example of a “violent secular political groups” that will be prioritized for “identification and neutralization,” as shown below.

Screenshot of pages 5-6 of the National Counterterrorism Strategy

Gorka’s fingerprints are also on Trump’s national security order NSPM-7, which directed federal agencies to root out extremism on “gender,” among other things deemed hostile to “traditional American views on family, religion and morality.” But the document does not explain how exactly it defines extremism on gender, leading some to think it was just a war on trans people. 

Gorka recently suggested that it goes farther than that.

In a little-noticed interview on Rabbi Michael Barclay’s podcast last month, Gorka warned of the “internal threat” to America, listing “mentally imbalanced transgender, nonbinary extremists” among them. (Nonbinary refers to people who identify as neither male nor female.) 

That is the first ever reference to non-binary extremism by a national security official, as far as I can tell.

Here’s Gorka’s full remark in context:

“Whether it’s jihadists, whether it’s cartels bringing in fentanyl, killing, you know, hundreds of thousands of Americans, whether it’s members of the DSA who wish to get rid of the presidency, the Senate, the Supreme Court. You know, whether it’s the external threat or the internal threat, whether it’s the mentally imbalanced transgender, non-binary extremists who literally walk into a Catholic church and murder little children at the Annunciation Church.”

Gorka is referring to the August 27, 2025 attack on Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis. Robin Westman, 23, fired more than a hundred rifle rounds through the church’s windows during an all-school Mass held to mark the first week of classes, killing two young children — before dying of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. The FBI investigated it as an act of domestic terrorism.

But the shooter was transgender, not non-binary. Westman, who had legally changed names in 2019, left behind videos and writings that prosecutors said expressed hatred toward nearly every group imaginable. The acting U.S. attorney put it more bluntly: the shooter “appeared to hate all of us.” I’m hard pressed to see how Westman’s gender identity had anything to do with it. 

In fact, I tried to find any evidence of a record of non-binary violence, and the only case I could come up with is the Zizians.

The Zizians are a small offshoot of the Bay Area “rationalist” cult that formed around the writings of Jack “Ziz” LaSota, and they have been linked by prosecutors to six killings across California, Pennsylvania and Vermont — among them a Border Patrol Agent shot during a Vermont traffic stop in January 2025. Maryland prosecutors last year described LaSota as the leader of an extremist group. Many of the group’s members are transgender or other nonconforming genders.

The group is definitely dangerous and extreme in their views; but those views are fixated on things like veganism, artificial intelligence and theory of mind stuff — not gender.

The Williams Institute at UCLA estimates roughly 2.1 million American adults as transgender — about 0.8 percent of the country — and puts nonbinary adults at around 1.2 million. This is the population Gorka has folded into a category alongside cartels and jihadists.

Gorka and company are obsessed with any sexual (and political) identities that don’t embrace guns, God (his God), and a Czarist love of the old world. 

He put this bluntly in his appearance on Barclay’s podcast, saying: 

“The question of our age is very simple: Does the West have the will to fight and defeat those who wish to destroy our civilization?”

The “West” that he’s referring to is threatened, Gorka says, not just by those who believe things he doesn’t agree with, but also by those who don’t believe in anything. That’s Gorka’s definition of groups like sexual predators, not as criminals, but as another extremist group invented under Trump: the “nihilist violent extremist,” which I reported on last year.

Just this week, the FBI announced the first-ever minor to be federally charged for “nihilistic violent extremism” — a 17-year-old from Maine, found to have committed acts of juvenile delinquency including conspiring to sexually exploit a child, distributing child sexual abuse material, cyberstalking and interstate threats. The Bureau says it is now investigating more than 500 “NVE” operatives nationwide, a number it says is on the rise, up from 350 investigations last December.

FBI press release

While the teenager’s crimes obviously merit criminal prosecution, does this really rise to the level of a terroristic threat to national security? 

Gorka thinks so. What is bizarre about this official with President Trump’s ear is that this extremist can chatter on without anyone in the press noticing. He’s a high-level government official!

Society, Gorka says, is in “a war to the death where only one side can win: the forces of light and goodness, or those who really are working for the destruction of our civilization.”

It’s pretty obvious who the real extremist is here.