Showing posts with label San Leandro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label San Leandro. Show all posts

Saturday, October 18, 2025

No KIngs Day Rally San Leandro CA

Richard Mellor

10-08-2025

A spirited rally in San Leandro California. I couldn't stay long but the mood was very lively and many different people there. I think there were perhaps more young people than last time. One other person who I asked what she hoped would come from these events said "peace. ". A commendable goal without doubt. There is a desperate mood in the country to rid ourselves of the gangster capitalists in the national body politic. One woman made it clear that the once quite unpopular governor, Gavin Newsom was beginning to grow on her but seemed to agree when that's not such a big deal when the alternative is the felon and serial sexual predator Trump. I guess it's the old lesser of two evils approach that's what happens every four years here in the US usually.

But while a considerable majority of the attendees would be Democratic Party voters or at least sympathisers I think, others are simply appalled at the present Administration and its more blatant assault on democratic rights, unions, free speech, and voters rights not to mention abortion and a woman's right to choose whether she has children or not. 

There was a tabling to get people to vote in November as there is a measure on the ballot that would give the politicians in the state legislature the power to redraw voting district boundaries that would favour Democrats over Republicans.  At the moment, changing voting district boundaries is in the ands of a non patrician citizen committee so it is a controversial issue returning that decision to politicians in the legislature. 

This has been introduced so quickly as a result of the Republicans doing the same thing in Texas that would increase their slim majority in the US Congress. Californian governor Gavin Newsom was able to get it on the ballot even though measures like these need thousands of signatures because the Democrats basically control the state legislature and were able to get the two thirds majority need in the absence of a signature campaign.  

It was probably one of the biggest rallies I have seen in my small town. One thing I regret was not taking the time to ask the young girl's views on the situation a little more.

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

San Leandro: Oh Man! I Didn't Condemn Hamas.

Doug's signature on the letter and the envelope it came in

Richard Mellor

I received the letter below in the post yesterday (8-4-25) from a Doug whose last name begins with an S but I can’t decypher the rest of the letters. It’s a bit worrisome that he took time to find my home address but forgot to put a return address on the envelope, so I won’t be able to thank him for his advice. I would not say it is a threatening letter.

I am assuming he is responding to a letter I wrote to my local paper, the San Leandro Times, calling for our city council to condemn the genocide in Gaza, (see my letter below his). If not, as he mentions the San Leandro community, it might be because I posted some similar content to a local Facebook Page of that name. 

 

Sadly, it is not uncommon for folks to limit their public discourse on social media to local events and avoid unpleasantries like an ongoing genocide made possible by our own government supplying the weapons and money. I am not unsympathetic to this tendency especially as there appears to be nowhere to turn, but I refuse to surrender to it.  

 

But the argument that we stick to local issues, because it’s nothing to do with our town or our community is simply wrong. Our mayor’s recent letter in the same San Leandro Times points out that we are living beyond our means and cuts and tax increases are needed. They all talk about fighting for us when they are on the campaign circuit but their fighting is limited to a very narrow arena and as soon as the real power, investors, real estate magnates, hedge fund managers and other social parasites that feed at the public trough demand it, their true role as agents of big business in our communities is revealed.

 

Here in San Leandro, a very important and well used footbridge across our creek was destroyed by trees in a storm. Yet who knows when that will be replaced? Yet the Biden Administration spent close to half a billion dollars building a jetty in Gaza giving the Zionist regime sea access to its victims. Aside from the tools of destruction, billions of US tax payers’ hard earned money has been sent to murder Palestinians. In the year up to October 2024 the US sent $17.9 billion to the Zionist regime according to the Watson Institute at Brown University (PDF) in what it refers to as a conservative estimate.

 

Yet a health issue can bankrupt a US family as our health care is so expensive and millions of us buy health care on credit cards. And don’t get me started on Dentists or the hosing problem or the climate crisis and a million other major issues that affect our local community.  So don’t tell me what happens in our small town is not affected by national or international events. The longer we ignore it the worse it will get.

 

So here is the letter I received in the mail yesterday with my letter to the paper below it. I am including a photo of Doug’s signature and if anyone local reading this knows Doug could you share this with him or have him send me his home address.  He describes himself as a Christian but didn’t find enough courage to put a return address on the letter; I have had courageous Christian friends whose faith was a major source of that courage. So if you know Doug, remind him in no uncertain terms that Jesus would have put a return address on his letters.

 

****************

 

“How about doing your little “tantrum dance” elsewhere and not use San leandro community to expose your biased and delusional theory about the Gaza War. How about instead condemning Hamas for starting this war, hiding behind innocent civilians, not releasing the hostages, and stealing the humanitarian aid causing this starvation.

 

When you admit that Hamas is the ones committing mass murder and genocide, then you might have some credibility. Say, “I condemn Hamas”. If you won’t then take your moral outrage and blow it out your nose.

 

As a Christian, I support Israel and and their noble cause to eradicate the barbaric sub human Hamas terrorists. Israel will always exist in spite of the constant rage of the anti-semites, who call for the destruction of this country.

 

These anti-Semites need to give this hate a rest and shine light and love instead of being dark and hateful.  Sincerely Doug S.”

 

My letter to the San Leandro Times

 

Demand an Arms Embargo on Israel

San Leandro Times
Thursday July 24th

 

San Leandro City Council needs to step up and condemn the Israeli/US genocidal war against the Palestinian people. Apart from it being the right thing to do from a moral viewpoint, we send billions of dollars to this Apartheid state in weaponry and cash without which it could not murder thousands of men women and children.


Meanwhile, millions of Americans are struggling to make ends meet.

 

The US ruling class is rife with anti-semites that have no love for Jews. It is committed to Israel, a colonial settler regime, as it is the only reliable ally US imperialism has in this important region of the world. The US Congress and the political class in general is dominated by Christian Zionists who see this slaughter as Biblical prophecy, another reason the war criminal Netanyahu was allowed in to the US and met with much applause in Congress.

 

Meanwhile, young anti-Zionist Jews are in the forefront of the campaign against Israel’s genocide which is the way to combat anti-semitism which the Zionist cause promotes. They are courageous young Americans and we need to support them.

 

All Germans weren’t Nazis and all Jews aren’t Zionists. Zionism is a political movement and Judaism is a religion; they are not the same. Zionism after its founding, was a fringe movement in Europe as most Jewish workers belonged to the Jewish Labor Bund or the socialist and communist parties. It was the Nazi Holocaust, the culmination of centuries of discrimination against Jews by Christian Europe, that changed that. 

 

It was not Palestinians but Christian Europe that tried to exterminate its Jewish population but it is the Palestinians that are suffering for it.

 

Most American’s oppose this genocide and want a more productive use of our tax money.

Saturday, February 11, 2023

San Leandro: Labor Vigil to Demand an End to Police Brutality on Feb. 16th

It is highly unlikely the leadership of the Alameda or and Francisco Labor Council's or affiliated unions will make the real effort to reach in to the depths of the memberhips of the affiliated locals and bring them out. In all my years as a delegate to the Alameda Council, this was never the strategy. It's is too risky mobilizing the troops because there is much anger among among union members and working people as a whole and controlling that anger, directing it in ways that will not threaten the status quo, is first and foremost.  However, it's important to try attend this and to raise it in your workplace and union.

Richard Mellor

Labor Vigil to Demand an End to Police Brutality on Feb. 16th

Local 21 Union Siblings, 

Enough is enough. It is a battle to believe and have hope that these injustices and atrocities will ever stop. We must take a stand and organize to demand that they do. 

In coalition with San Francisco Labor Council, Alameda Labor Council, Contra Costa Labor Council, and community organizations, we will participate in a vigil on Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 5:30pm that demands an end to police brutality. One of the demands of the vigil is the passage of the George Floyd Act in Congress, as well as action at the state level in Sacramento. We demand an end to police brutality and all racially-motivated violence. Black lives matter.

What: Labor & Community Coalition to Demand the End of Police Brutality 
When: Thursday, February 16th at 5:30pm 
Where: Steps of San Francisco City Hall, 1 Dr Carlton B Goodlett Pl, San Francisco, CA 94102

Click here to RSVP to the Vigil on Feb. 16
"We mourn the death of Tyre Nichols and the countless other victims of police brutality. IFPTE Local 21 vows to recommit to the fight against racially-motivated violence, especially against Black lives and other people of color."

– Gus Vallejo, President - IFPTE Local 21

 

Monday, March 8, 2021

San Leandro's Racial Exclusion. A Little History From My Home Town.

Richard Mellor

HEO/GED

This is Jack Maltester, the former Mayor of my town situated a little south of Oakland California; he passed away some time ago. I have lived here in San Leandro for some time having lived in Oakland previously. The public utility I worked for has facilities here where I spent the past 6 years before my retirement.

For many years, the Black guys I worked with who lived across the border in Oakland, particularly the older folks, would talk about how difficult it was for them if they worked down here but especially as they drove through. They were constantly harassed or stopped by the police. They used to call it Klan Leandro. For years I never wanted to move here because of this reputation though I worked with many white guys that grew up here and certainly were not by any means people that would fit that description. Despite any weaknesses white workers may have, the issue of racism is a social one, it is integral to capitalist society and it is through the institutions of the capitalist state that racism is felt the most; housing education, the justice system, opportunity etc.

I moved to East Oakland in 1980 and then, after returning home after work,  I never saw white people again until I returned to work the next day as they generally lived outside the city in the suburbs or smaller towns that make up this huge urban area. When I first came to the US, I found it to be much more segregated than where I lived in North London, it seemed white poverty was rural in the main and black was urban. I remember there was a cross burning on a Black family's lawn in San Leandro as late as 1984 I think it was, and when I first got here in 1973, two years after this interview, I recall the KKK confident enough to be quite open in Castro Valley, the town to the east.

By 1970 San Leandro was 99.4% white and out of a population of about 70,000 there were maybe 25 Black folks the mayor estimated. Maltester explains that the racial exclusion was not accidental. Home ownership is very important in the US as it is seen as a symbol of prestige and stability never mind that one may never actually own the home until near death after paying the moneylenders their interest payments. So the home is the bank in a way, it provides security in old age and also a source of cash for a child's education and so on. The idea of free education, socialized medicine and social housing is so demonized and labelled socialistic in order to drive people in to debt bondage, anything but freedom from the clutches of capital.

On May 6, 1967, Maltester made some comments about racial inequality at a hearing of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was investigating housing discrimination. He admitted that prejudice was a part of the problem, you cross the border from Oakland and San Leandro is 1% black. We have to remember that his comments came in the midst of the Black Revolt and the rise of revolutionary figures like Martin Luther King, Malcolm X Fred Hampton and so on. The Black Revolt and scenes of men, women and young children being beaten by police and having dogs set on them was a global embarrassment to the US ruling class, the leaders of the so-called free world and a paragon of democracy and human rights. Any concessions Maltester made as he found himself a secure niche in the racially infused system was a result of the Black Revolt.

He was mayor for many years and his talk of having no simple answer is nonsense. There was a simple answer, take a damn position against it and work to that end. He claims "blacks don't want to come" to San Leandro. I wonder why? He is honest to a point though when he says that running for office means you have to "take everyone in to account". Most importantly, take those who have more money in to account and given the history in the US, that means white folks.

Things have changed a lot and San Leandro, which was once on 60 minutes a popular US news program as the most racist town in the US, has changed considerably. But the reliance on racism as the primary divide and rule strategy on the part of US capitalism remains.

Wednesday, October 7, 2020

Bay Area Health Care Worker. Why We're On Strike

Members of the California Nurses Association and SEIU are out on picket lines. Facts For Working People talked with this SEIU member, also on the union's bargaining team, and she shares the issues that they have been negotiating over the past two years. They represent many workers in the public health system.

Monday, May 7, 2018

Taxing Homeowners Will not Fix Public Education

West Virginia Showed the Way. Source
Below is a letter I wrote that was published in the letters to the editor section of my local paper, the San Leandro Times. I wrote it in response to a representative of the San Leandro Teachers Association CTA/NEA who made an appeal in the letters to the editor the previous week for voters to support a parcel tax for the schools. This is a disastrous position and will not solve what is a national crisis in public education.  Not only is a parcel tax not a solution, a small community like mine and millions of others, cannot drive back the capitalist offensive in isolation.  I was limited to 300 words which is not easy for me as readers of this blog must know by now. I will be commenting further on the local education struggles in another post. Richard Mellor

Taxing Homeowners Will not Fix Public Education

Editor:
John sherr’s call for a parcel tax to “build upon” the “quiet renaissance” in the SL schools reflects the conservative approach of today’s union leadership.  Sherr boasts of the collaborative relationship between the teachers’ union and the district management. This Team Concept approach, working as a partner with management as opposed to confronting them as an organized independent force, is a major contributor in the decline of union power and living standards.

Now Sherr, the SLTA leadership and management are joining forces to increase taxes on workers and the middle class to place a local band aid over a nationally failing education system.

Recent events have shown us what works and what doesn’t. In West Virginia, the official union leadership was brushed aside by a movement from below as education workers struck in a state where striking is illegal winning wage increases for themselves and all state workers.  Teachers from Oklahoma to Arizona have been in the streets in unprecedented numbers shutting down state schools and for more funding.

All school districts will be slashing education further in the coming downturn as school board representatives carry out the dictates of big business.

Building on the recent events of mass action and linking with other forces fighting austerity is what will make real improvements in education. Building the movement to combat these assaults on working people will not be made easier by taxing ourselves.

There is no shortage of money as the $800 billion offense budget or the $786 million one billionaire made in 2017 shows.

The California Teachers Association to which the SLTA is affiliated, has 330,000 members and is part of the National Education Association with 3 million members.

This is where our power lies, fighting from a position of strength, not in joint ventures with management.

Richard Mellor

Thursday, July 6, 2017

Local Councils and Municipal Boards Push the Big Business Agenda


Just a few thoughts for the day here. Here is the letter I sent to my local paper regarding the school board's proposal to extend an expiring property tax which will mean a doubling of it. There's a 300 word limit. RM


Dear Editor,
I have received two letters from the San Leandro School Board in the period of one week. The object of these letters is to produce a “yes” vote on a proposal to extend a $39 parcel tax that expires next year. The tax will be extended and doubled to $78.

This proposal will keep the education system in the dismal state it is already in and they will be back for more. The proposal is divisive and will weaken our ability to improve education in the future. The proposal exempts seniors in the hope that we can be encouraged to pass the tax on to younger homeowners who have scraped enough funds together to buy a home, get some tax relief and escape the clutches of the landlords. Many in this group are already strapped for cash.

While higher earners who send their children to public school as a matter of principle or moral obligation can pay, most people who send there children to public schools have no alternative, they have to. This group is more likely to be lower income and renters, and the landlords will simply pass this tax on to them. Then there are older people and other low-income folks who will be forced to pay a tax that will not solve the education crisis and hurt them financially.

The alternative to taxing ourselves, is to build a wider direct action movement to force changes in society and allocate more resources to education. We have to be united to do this. School board members could play a different role and help build a united resistance; instead, their proposal divides us, harming the battle for decent education for all.

If you are interested in discussing these ideas I can be reached at: we_know_whats_up@yahoo.com

Friday, May 19, 2017

San Leandro: Local School Boards as Agents of the Big Business Agenda



Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired

This is following up on a previous commentary about the San Leandro school board imposing taxes on working people, the poor and the middle class in order to maintain the public schools in their present dismal state.  There is no pretense at all that they intend to actually fight to improve and expand public education. They have absolutely no program, strategy of plan to throw back the present assault on public education.

What is happening here is happening throughout the country and the world. It is the generalized offensive against the working class, making the working class, the poor, the indigenous people, the rural workers pay for the crisis for the system.  Our fightback can start where we are but must always have a national and indeed international perspective.

Here is a flier Facts For Working People produced about this issue previously.

Friday, November 4, 2016

San Leandro: Mobile Home Millionaires exploiting the poor.



 The uncivilized practice of dealing in human shelter. Safe, secure and affordable housing is a human right.

Be sure to check out the links below for an interview with one of the investors that has purchased this Mobile Home Park and also a video from the Guardian about investors in these facilities and how they get rich doing it as well.

Here is the interview. This parasitic individual is described  as a Young entrepreneur building a Mobile Home community. Funny isn't it, someone destroying communities described as building them-------Orwellian. https://youtu.be/xFP_2RQGS9A

Mobile Home University. How to get rich through dealing in human shelter.  https://youtu.be/xFP_2RQGS9A

Complaint filed against against  Cascade Corporate Management Inc. by a resident of one of their mobile home parks. http://www.psyclaw.com/2014-04-28-FILED-Complaint.pdf

The complaint alleges: Negligence, Negligent Supervision and Premises Liability 

Rally: San Leandro City Hall steps:
Monday November 7th
6:00 pm

Saturday, July 2, 2016

Teamsters and Taylor Farms. Boycotts are not enough.

2014, Hoffa at Taylor Farms rally
By Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired

My small town newspaper, the San Leandro Times, had a piece in it a couple weeks ago about a local Safeway store manager who called the cops on the Teamsters who were leafleting outside.  They were handing out fliers protesting Safeway selling products from Taylor farms an outfit the unions claim, “…mistreats and underpays workers…”  *

No worker would object to that but all these companies underpay and mistreat workers. In this case, most of the workers are immigrants though, working for an outfit called Taylor Farms. This makes a difference as there is more support from socially conscious white liberals at the disgusting treatment of immigrant workers here in California and a passive attempt to shame the company and get shoppers not to shop, in what is an area with a large Latino population, might have a small affect. More importantly it gives the impression that the union movement is actually doing something for the most vulnerable and oppressed among us.

Here in California we have a constitutional right to leaflet on private property like a shopping center parking lot. This right came about I believe through the Pruneyard decision and I have refused to leave these areas in the past when managers send out the guard or ask me themselves to leave. In fact, I generally tell them to call the cops who have always supported my right to do so. The reader might find this interesting and a little humorous.

They have been chipping away at this right and normally when confronted say that there is a designated area for such free speech activity. Naturally, the designated area is way off in the corner and away from the members of the public who you want to read you leaflet.

In this instance, the president of teamsters local 70, Dominic Chiovare was there. This local is one of the largest if not the largest Teamster local in the area.

According to the Times, when the cops got there the Teamsters were told to move down to the designated area where no one would get the leaflet as that is likely where the bosses chose to designate it, and the courts, their courts and their legislators, have given this chicanery approval.  As they always have with me, they accused those leafleting of harassing people, blocking the entrance etc. This is standard procedure.

Claiming they weren’t going to be there long, the Teamsters “…complied, just to keep the peace” the Times reports.

The problem is that labor officials have been keeping the peace at their members’ expense for decades.

Teamster President, Dominic Chiovare confirmed this, being quoted in the paper, “We did it the friendly way……we’ve been friendly and polite the whole time.”  I assume he means to the customers and I would believe him. The Times reporter also confirmed this, writing, “But the entire time a San Leandro reporter was there, the path for customers was clear, no teamster obstructed anyone’s path, and the teamsters couldn’t have been more polite.” The bosses, more accurately their policies, are not friendly at all, not at Taylor Farms, not at Safeway.

Chiovare complied with Safeway telling the Times,  “We did it the friendly way….but if we wanted to we could have hundreds of teamsters down here in an hour and shut this place down. That’s how things get ugly---when you stop people from exercising their rights.”

Leaving aside that neither the Teamsters nor any other union for that matter has shut a business of this size down and don’t really attempt to. And as far as I understand it, the “designated Area” is a legal definition and you’d need a lot more than 300 people and have to violate the law here. I am not opposed to violating the law and in fact argue we have to violate the law if we want to throw back and defeat the austerity agenda of capital or the 1% as people refer to it. But we have to violate the law in a mass way and that means mobilizing the members and the wider working class. The union hierarchy is much more afraid of this than they are the bosses.

But the heads of organized labor from the top down have not shown any inclination that they are willing to actually go on the offensive against the employers, especially ones like Safeway. Even when there is no law to violate, the position of the strategists atop organize labor is to help the employers compete which amounts to concessions on the part of their members. In every bargaining situation they start from a position that concessions have to be made. Workers have to be “realistic.”

Two years ago the Teamsters held a rally outside the Taylor Farms plant in Tracy CA. It was the usual scene, 700 people were there which can be empowering. But the bosses' are not afraid of rallies like these. What they respond to is profits and profits are hurt when plants are shut down. At this rally the Teamster International president Jimmy Hoffa shows up, gets his picture taken and makes a speech:
“I bring you greetings from the 1.4 million members of the Teamsters union,” Hoffa told workers at the rally. “I’ve heard about the lack of respect here, the fact that people can’t use the restroom when they need to, and that workers have been here ten years and are temporary employees. That's got to change – and we’re going to change it.”

The problem is that the old "I bring you the greetings of millions" speech is not new and one million 375,000 Teamsters have probably never heard of the dispute. And even if they did, greetings don't back bosses off. What Hoffa won't do is mobilize these millions to act on their own behalf.

Most of the workers inside Safeway are represented by the UFCW. The leadership of the UFCW called its members out back in 2003 readers may remember.  The strike was pretty effective in Southern California shutting down much of the stores’ activity. The leadership sent strikers up to the Bay Area for informational picket lines encouraging shoppers to boycott the stores up here. As one shopper told me when I was on those lines, “UFCW members, in the same union as those on strike are in the store stocking the shelves and you want me not to shop here in support of the strikers?”

Of course, he shouldn’t have gone in but he has a point. The problem was that they were in different locals. The way to win would have been to bring the workers here out and indeed, push that 2003 strike to become a national strike. In other words, in every possible way make the dispute more general. Safeway is a giant global corporation, and no one union can beat them. But this would have been illegal, and the labor officialdom never breaks the law or gets involved in shady deals except when it comes to dealing with their own members. My union Afscme has done it the ILWU has done it, the Machinists, all of them.

Only recently myself and others were on picket lines at the local Waste Management center where the lowest paid workers, mostly immigrant workers and members of the ILWU Local 6, had gone on strike. Teamster officials from another local but a member of the same council as Local 70, were escorting their drivers across the picket lines along with management; it was an ugly sight indeed. Their argument was that there was some unmet organizational obligations and they wouldn’t honor the strike. The teamster drivers hated it, they knew it was wrong but the officials have economic power over them. It’s not easy to cross them if you’re not organized in to an open caucus.

The way to win for the immigrant workers at Taylor Farms is by linking up all these struggles. The workers inside Safeway have seen their living standards decline. The newer hires often receive lower wages and fewer benefits, concessions forced on them by contracts that they could not vote on.

When I hear a labor official like Dominic Chiovare talk about being friendly I have to laugh a bit. Power is what attracts.  The average union member on the job might not say it openly but the general view is not only that our leaders are corrupt, it’s that they’re too close and friendly with the boss.  They are absolutely right about that though they may not be clear as to why.

We would do wise to listen to our enemies who are clear about the class nature of society and how to maintain their interests. The powerful bourgeois George Schultz writes:

Negotiations are a euphemism for capitulation if the shadow of power is not cast across the bargaining table. 

The strategists atop organized labor ensure that the show of power is absent at the negotiating table.

The top union officials do not have to work under the contracts that they impose on their own members. Rome Aloise, a Teamster official who was VP of the Teamster Joint Council 7, a Teamster International Vice President and also an official in Local 853 that represents the drivers that he ordered to cross the lines in the above Waste Management strike, earned $346,722 in salaries and allowances in 2014. The workers whose picket lines his local violated earned $12 an hour. Aloise has since been in some hot water himself.  

It’s incredible arrogance that someone like that, earning the money he did or does**”…told the Mercury News that the fight against Waste Management is “unrealistic” and that the workers were just “pawns” of the ILWU leadership and that the campaign for these workers , “…is based on a promise that cannot be met and is designed to create false hopes for the workers.”

No one would oppose leafleting a store about another rotten employer, especially if it was part of a wider strategy to bring all the workers together, not just the organized but the unorganized and workers in our communities as well. But the point of doing that would be to raise everyone’s standard of living. It would mean fighting for jobs, health care, and waging a general struggle against austerity.  

This can only lead to chaos from the union officials view of the world.  It is one thing to bring thousands of people together to fight for their rights and livelihoods. It’s another to control its direction once people get a sense of their commonality and real power. Plus, it would mess up the relationship they’ve built with the employers based on labor peace.

Teamsters have been getting their asses kicked too. It’s not simply the poorest and low waged workers. The bosses’ aren’t afraid of the Teamster or any other union officials’ threats after years of concessionary deal making. There’ll have to be some changes made in the unions to change that dynamic.

*San Leandro Times 6-23-16
** I am not aware of the situation at this time with regards to Aloise’ status after being brought up on charges.

Monday, April 25, 2016

Big Landords own politicians, take the battle directly to them with direct action

Note: Since this was published, a tenant from the complex and myself have both received confirmation from different persons at Supervisor Wilma Chan's office that she is indeed the representative for their area.  What a runaround.
RM

There are some corrections regarding  yesterdays posting about the tenants struggle in Hayward.

Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired

This is just local news but for people outside of California and abroad who are involved in social activism, union struggles or other issues of that nature, it is an example of how government doesn't work when it comes to working class and poor people and I am sure all are familiar with it.

I had posted a blog last night about a group of tenants whose landlords, a Sammy Chan and Francis Leung, who also have an accounting business, are raising the rent for the tenants at 21631 and 21663 Garden Avenue Hayward by 50%. This means anywhere from $600 to $900 for these people.  Read that account here.

From what I can gather, this apartment complex is in an unincorporated part of Hayward CA.* The tenants were also told this by some representative at Hayward City Council from what I was understand.  The tenants, who have formed the Hayward Gardens Tenants Association, decided yesterday at a meeting I attended, to have a "call in" today to the offices of the county supervisor whose area they thought it was, a Scott Haggerty.  Alameda County, where Hayward is situated, has five supervisors one for each district.

I called Scott Haggerty's office this morning and was told that it is not his jurisdiction, that it was Richard Valle's in district 2 and was forwarded to his office. I left a message.

I received a call back from an employee at Valle's office who was very friendly and helpful but told me that Valle was not the representative for the area in which the apartments are located, but Wilma Chan is. She is the county supervisor for district 3.

I just got off the phone with Wilma Chan's office and was told that Ms Chan is not the representative for the apartments located at 21631 and 21663 Garden Avenue Hayward, in fact, there is no supervisorial representation for this address.

I am not familiar with this type of political set up so I ask a simple question:

"Who  is the political representative for these tenants?"

All I can say at this point is that I was told by Chan's office that the residences at this address were in the 13th Congressional District in 2011 but are now in the 15th Congressional district

I was also told they were in the 18th Assembly District in 2011 but are now in the 20th Assembly district.

The congressional representative for the 15th district that includes 21631 and 21663 Garden Avenue Hayward is Eric Swalwell a Democrat.

It is no wonder that people avoid mainstream politics like the plague. Not only does the average person hate it, they hate politicians and they have drawn the conclusion that the political, system is corrupt. But the real issue is that political parties are not devoid of class content, they represent classes, groups of people with economic interests. The Democratic and Republican parties represent the rich, they are Wall Street parties. Working people as yet have no party.

How can the average working class person spare the time to deal with this bureaucratic nonsense? It is not accidental, it is supposed to work like this for ordinary folk. It is impossible when you have to work, have children and then have to fend off predatory attacks by landlords like those in the case we are dealing with here. I am not faulting the workers who answered the phones and helped me as best they could. It is not their fault. The system is set up to ensure working people have no real voice and our interests are not represented.  While the Democrats claim to be the friends of working people and the poor, nothing significant changes.

This has been frustrating for me and I can only imagine what it's like for those that don't have the time. The rich have lawyers and an ear of the politicians, but we have numbers.

I reiterate what I said yesterday that the best way to fend off attacks from big landlords and all moneyed interests is to confront them directly. I gave some examples.  Direct action, leafleting their neighborhoods, mobilizing people to picket their other businesses etc. It is when their pocket books are hurt that they act.

I suggest that actions like these will be the best way the tenants group will make headway with this landlord. It also makes us feel less like helpless victims.

I also called the landlords accounting firm at 415-546-7718 and left a message for Sammy Chan and that I was displeased with his actions.  His extension is 111 and Francis Leung's is 108. Their firm is:
Sammy Chan Francis Leung
9 Kearny Street LLC
50 Victoria Ave, Ste 210
Millbrae, Ca 94030

*For readers abroad, this means it is in a city but not politically part of that city and instead falls under the jurisdiction of the country the city is in.

Sunday, April 24, 2016

Hayward landlords raise rents 50%. Tenants fight back


Tenants are not prepared to take this lying down.
By Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired

I attended a meeting of some  Hayward tenants today whose landlords have raised rents 50% that amounts to increases of anywhere from $600 to $900.  The word “terrorism” is very popular these days though the mass media rarely uses it to describe domestic acts of terror and never when it comes to Landlords. But we should recognize that what is happening to these tenants in Hayward is an act of terror, economic terrorism. One person I spoke to is on disability retirement and also has a daughter. For him it will mean being on the street. There are people serving time for much less than this.

The tenants, residents of 21631 and 21663 Garden Avenue in Hayward CA, are fighting back and have formed the Hayward Gardens Tenants Association. Through a lawyer they have managed to slow the process down as the Landlords through their property management company violated numerous legal procedures. 

One important violation is that California state law requires a landlord to give tenants a 30-day notice of any rent increase. But this period rises to 60 days if the increases are above 10% as far as I understand it.   A rent increase of 10% is considered “seriously high” as one attorney put it.  An increase of 50% is savage. Imagine one’s mortgage increasing by 50% in a month. What sort of human being is this?

The landlords, like most of them with any significant rental income property, hire property managers as they do their best to keep as much distance as possible between themselves and their victims.  These particular Landlords, Sammy Chan and Francis Leung also have their own accounting firm, called 9 Kearny Street LLC.

One tenant said that they want to appeal to the landlords so they understand what this means to them but someone that can do this does not care. They see their tenants simply as income-----unit 12, unit 35 and do so on.  The other problem is that they can legally raise this rent 50%, they have simply not followed procedure. The courts and the politics of city and state governments are all dominated by landlord interests, everyone knows that.  And while any rent control is welcomed, the bigger fight is for affordable and decent social housing.

In this case, the complex is in what is called an unincorporated area so it does not fall under Hayward City Council’s jurisdiction but the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County, the county that Hayward is in.  There is no rent control at all in unincorporated Hayward.

Skyrocketing rents and gentrification is making it almost impossible for people that work in some urban centers from living in them. This is particularly the case in San Francisco across the bay and increasingly in Oakland a few miles north of Hayward. Municipal bodies do next to nothing to prevent these type of assaults on working or people and our need for affordable housing. And we cannot rely on the courts as money always wins in these forums, any success we have in them is very limited as the law is on the side of the landlord.

I was invited to the meeting of the tenants to share my experiences as I was involved in a renters’ rights group some years ago and we had some major successes.  I stressed that the bottom line is the that law is against them, that the landlords can legally do what they are doing.  The tenants’ strength lies in organizing and using more direct action methods, relying their own strength and not the politicians who will only act if forced to do so. What works is mobilizing people and not just those directly affected as if this landlord gets away with this others will be encouraged.

When a landlord(s) intervenes in our lives in such a way that our health and welfare and the welfare of our families and our children are affected, we can retaliate by intervening in theirs lives as well as the lives of politicians who do nothing or who pay lip service when complaints are brought to them.  “You have to follow protocol” is the common refrain which means us as victims taking the road that will ensure defeat and a sense of helplessness. They want to wear us down until we go away.

Landlords often have other business that organized tenants and their allies can picket. They go to church where we can turn up and leaflet the congregation explaining the harm they are doing to others through their business lives. We can find out where they live and leaflet their neighbors. All sorts of direct activity that hurts their pocket books or reveals their darker side can be used as long as there are no threats of violence and other counterproductive activity. The main point is that they are interfering negatively in our lives and we can do the same with theirs. It is when their economic interests are threatened that they listen and act regardless of any laws.

Even if this particular landlord is using the 50% figure as a bluff in order to lower it and show the tenants he has compassion, that itself is an act of terror. It is terrorizing people, threatening to make them homeless.

The 22 tenants at today’s meeting decided to organize a “call in” tomorrow (April 25th) to the Office of Scott Haggerty, the Alameda Board of Supervisors representative for their unincorporated area of Alameda County. It is a disgrace that this can occur at all.

They are asking any and all friends and allies to do the same. The tenant’s address is 21631 and 21663 Garden Avenue in Hayward CA and their group is called the Hayward Gardens Tenants Association.

Scott Haggerty is the representative for Alameda County District 1. His number is 510-272-6691. His official webpage is here.

The landlords, Sammy Chan and Francis Leung, business address is:

Sammy Chan Francis Leung
9 Kearny Street LLC
50 Victoria Ave, Ste 210
Millbrae, Ca 94030

Their phone number is: 415-546-7718 If you can call them as well that would help. Lets put some pressure on these people and let them know we know what they’re doing and we don’t like it.

Thursday, November 12, 2015

San Leandro Tenants Demand Rent Control Now

This is about local events in San Leandro CA. It might be of interest to readers nationally and outside the country.
You can download a PDF of this here




By Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired
Member Green Party of USA

At the last Rent Board Meeting I spoke of how these boards are dominated and controlled by moneyed interests. We can see how well organized the landlords are from the information in the included graphic. Thomas Silva a member of the board and one of the two “official” representatives of the landlords according to City Council documents, Daniel Johnson being the other one, is a member of the Rental Housing Association, an organization created to defend and advance the economic interests of landlords.

John Sullivan a major landlord is a regular at the Rent Board tenants have told this writer. Sullivan is the “Chairman” of the RHA Mediation Committee. His actual function in this role is to ensure that his income from his investments, which in this case is human shelter, is not disturbed.

We only have to take a glimpse at parts of their agenda to see why it’s so important for tenants, like workers in unions, to have independent organizations. Organizations that do not confine themselves to electoral activity but use direct action tactics like rent strikes, turning up at their fancy dinners like this one in the included announcement and other tactics.  It is a strategy session is what it is.

On the agenda at their luncheon in July was:

(1) Addressing political threats facing the rent control and the rental housing industry
(2) Importance of the upcoming election
(3) Opportunities for property owners/managers to unite and take action to prevent new regulations

By “political threats” they are referring to legislation that hinders their income revenue, the rent tenants fork over to them every month. They use some of that money to elect “industry” friendly politicians. We should ask: why is housing a for profit industry?  How we house society should not be in the hands of hedge fund managers and real estate speculators.

They concern themselves with elections in order to get their representatives in to political positions, to ensure their rental income is safe and legal and political power over the renter is maintained.

And # 3 is clear.  They are aware of the power of association or combination as it has been called and how division weakens their ranks.  They want to speak as a group.  They want to be able to use this combination of moneyed power to keep tenants in a permanent state of insecurity and fear. Despite whatever individual views they may have, these people recognize that racism, ageism, gender discrimination and other such divisions within their organization hurts their collective self interest and we as workers and middle class people should recognize that it hurts ours just as much.

James Kilpatrick is another San Leandro Landlord. He is president of NAI Global that is the “…single largest, most powerful global network of owner-operated commercial real estate brokerage firmsIt is a organization of investors, landlords and others engaged in speculative and socially damaging activity.

When you are speaking to rent boards, city councils or other municipal bodies this is who you are addressing. These are the people, the forces, behind the elected officials.

Here in San Leandro we have no rent control. At the next meeting on Tuesday 17th the Rent Board will present some changes to an already toothless ordinance as far as tenants are concerned. Despite the board having two members that are described as “tenants” on its official website, Sandra Johnson Simon and Maria Luisa Penaranda, along with one listed as “homeowner”, Mia Ousley, a landlord friendly proposal is before the board. Hopefully the two tenants representatives and Ms Ousley will vote against it and present a resolution demanding that the San Leandro City Council immediately introduce rent control legislation  We can be sure that significant discussions between the landlords’ representatives both on and off these boards occur behind the scenes at gatherings like the luncheon described in the graphic above.

In the end tenants, just like workers in unions, can only rely on their own strength, their numbers and their ability to stop economic activity. Tenants in San Leandro have potential power if they organize.  The landlords have the money but they have to get it off the tenants.  The US has a history of renters’ strikes against landlordism, especially in NYC for example.  But there are many strategies and tactics that can be used to fight for your rights, direct action tactics that are legal and within one’s rights as an American. The landlords (who normally like to operate through third parties so they don’t have to look their victims in the eye) have no conscience when it comes to taking hard earned money off tenants.

But it is not just high rents that must be fought, but the power the landlord has over a tenant’s life.  It is not unlike the workplace where, despite rules and regulations, workers face discrimination and harassment every day if they speak up for their rights. Only a strong union with an active membership on the job can defend workers’ rights, not officials in an office in Washington DC.

So building a permanent tenants’ organization must be part of any campaign like this and homeowners (we have landlords too, the banks) should support this. And as we can see, the landlords belong to numerous organizations that are statewide and national in nature. A strong organization will empower tenants to get involved and speak up as retaliation by landlords and their agents can be met with some retaliation (legal activity of course) from tenants. If activity is confined to acceptable norms (it’s called going through channels) the “channels” are designed so the landlords can’t lose.

In the last analysis housing is a human right; it is human shelter. Landlords or real estate speculators like Kilpatrick, Sullivan, Thomas Silva and Morton Friedkin a SL Landlord and land speculator who owns some 2000 or more units in Chicago, see a home as a commodity to be bought and sold as if it were pork bellies on the Chicago exchange or shares in a tech firm. Their activities are destructive to our communities including community based small business.  Security in housing can only be guaranteed through publicly funded affordable housing, the right of every human being in a civilized society.

Tenants, their families and supporters should turn up on Tuesday.  The tenants that have been meeting so far have demanded that the proposal be rejected.  They have also stated that their goal is a strong rent control provision be introduced in San Leandro. They should be supported in this campaign. But we must not have any illusions in the Rent Board, City Council, the courts or other institutions where moneyed interests dictate policy.

Here's a flier the tenants put out with the information on the rent board meeting.  Share it with your neighbors and if you can with tenants in your building.   How the rent increases in San Leandro Will Affect you.

Monday, November 9, 2015

San Leandro Landlords Want More Money, More Power.


by Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired

I have been meeting with some tenants in San Leandro where I live.  San Leandro landlords, many of them investment companies and speculators who own thousands of properties in the Bay Area or even nationwide, want more power to raise rents, I reported on this here. The rent board is discussing this issue again at it's next meeting on November 17th (flier above)and will vote on their latest landlord friendly proposal.

Most people know that these boards are landlord friendly despite claims of "netrality".  The problem is, even if a member is a decent person there is no such thing as neutrality in politics, and in the politics we are dealing with here, money and landlordism sets the agenda. As my earlier report mentioned, rents are pricing working and middle class people out of San Leandro and other communities in the Bay Area. People cannot afford to live where they work placing further stress on people and families.

The flier that one of the tenants put together above, explains the immediate issue that is being discussed by the board that will eventually make recommendations to the city council. The increases they want will be based on "Base Rent" which can include all sorts of added fees including u tilities increasing your actual rent by another $200 or more.
I am appealing to any homeowners in San Leandro to come to this meeting and comment under the public speaking period (a short time as they don't want to really hear the public) and speak in support of renters.

If you are one of those people/homeowners that sees a home as human shelter, as a place to live and raise a family as opposed to a commodity to be "flipped" every few years which artificially raises prices for those that actually need a home to live in, it is important to show solidarity with tenants. We all have issues, homeowners are never secure as the Great Depression showed through some 5 million foreclosures.  By supporting each other we can have more power to affect change in our community and beyond.

A small victory here would strengthen tenants as opposed to landlords but most importantly it will encourage other tenants to get involved.  As I commented in a previous piece on this blog, it is not only the cost of rents that weigh heavily on tenants, it is the fear of retribution from landlords if they speak up or complain. As I said, the mass media is not shy about using the term "Terrorism" to describe any opponent of US government policy including labor strikes, but we should make it clear that tenants, often low income people, single women, senior citizens, immigrants, and many people of color in particular, are the victims of landlords' terror tactics. We should not be shy here, if you fear losing the roof over your head for making legitimate complaints about your living conditions that's terrorism.

In the immediate term, the tenants want to drive back this most recent assault on their living standards and security. But what they also demand is a strong rent control provision and all supporters of this can stand with them Tuesday and at the city council.

The views in this commentary are my own but as we should with regard to work and jobs, we demand what we need not what landlords, the hedge fund managers and the corporations deem acceptable. We demand what we need to live a decent life, not what the two Wall Street Parties and their political representatives claim society can afford. We can afford battleships, drones and a military industrial complex that produces more weapons of mass destruction than the rest of the world put together so we can certainly expect decent housing.

Housing should not be in the hands of private industry, hedge fund firms and the like. We must demand and fight for decent and affordable housing for all, this is a human right and only the public sector can accomplish this, profit should not enter in to it. The propaganda of the bankers says otherwise but we see and experience the private sector's failures day in day out.  Blackrock, a money lending outfit was spending $100 million a week buying up foreclosed homes and short sales in the aftermath of the Great Recession and spent billions overall. These were homes that people lost. Normally these big investor landlords don't like buying single family homes as it's too much work, they like their victims under one roof so they can access them more easily. It's cheaper, but the deal was to good, the profits too lucrative.

Every victory can strengthen  and build a movement. Tenants need a strong independent movement that can represent renters in all aspects of their struggle against landlords and use direct action tactics to win their demands rather than relying on the courts and the political set up that is designed to wear people down until they give up. For homeowners, it is in our interests to ensure that all of us have a safe and secure place to live that doesn't drive people in to poverty as it enriches a minority of mostly absentee landlords. While all tenants deserve protection, I am not referring here to a landlord whose parents died and they are fortunate enough to inherit a home, that is another issue.  I am specifically referring to huge real estate speculators and investors, the faceless people who have too much control over our lives.

Some of us enjoy living in San Leandro, we like it here.  Having decent affordable housing for all residents is a social issue and benefits all of us. Come to this meeting and let the tenants, and the board know whose side your on.

If you want a copy of the flier above you can download it here.

To read about the Campaign For Renters' Rights  successful campaign on behalf of Section 8 tenants download this report.