Showing posts with label oil industry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oil industry. Show all posts

Saturday, July 25, 2026

The Tiger Eats Its Keeper: On Saudi Arabia, the Gulf Arab States, and the Empire That Trained Its Own Executioner



Photograph: a man walks a tiger through Dubai.

The Tiger Eats Its Keeper: On Saudi Arabia, the Gulf Arab States, and the Empire That Trained Its Own Executioner 

By Sirantos Fotopoulos

7-25-26

 

In October of 2003, on a stage in Las Vegas built entirely on the proposition that a man could tame the untamable, a seven-year-old white tiger named Montecore closed his jaws around the throat of Roy Horn and dragged him into the dark behind the curtain. The show was called Siegfried and Roy, and for fourteen years it grossed 45 million dollars annually. For fourteen years it had grossed that sum on the premise that domination over a wild animal could be permanent, choreographed, and safe for a paying audience of 1,500 people a night. Horn had never once been so much as scratched during those fourteen years. He had built an empire of spectacle on the back of an animal whose nature he believed he had rewritten through decades of proximity and control. The tiger, as it turned out, harbored other ideas entirely. Whether Montecore was attacking Horn or dragging him toward what the tiger perceived as safety remains disputed to the present day, and it hardly matters at all. The point stands regardless of the animal's intention that night. The thing you cage never stops being what it always was underneath. It waits for the moment the choreography slips.

 

Six thousand miles east of that stage sits a kingdom that has spent fifty years perfecting an identical act. Saudi Arabia caged the hydrocarbon economy and called the performance modernization. It caged its own population and called the performance stability. It caged the international community's dependency on its oil and called the performance leverage. Mohammed bin Salman inherited the act from his father's generation and decided the trick needed bigger cats. He commissioned skyscrapers that mirror the sky for 106 miles. He commissioned floating opera houses and coral-reef ski resorts and a cube in Riyadh eight times the volume of the Empire State Building. He called the whole apparatus Vision 2030, and he staged it as a spectacle for an audience that included sovereign wealth funds, Formula One executives, LIV Golf players, and the credulous business press of three continents. The kingdom trained its zoo in public for a decade. This summer of 2026 is teaching a captive audience what happens when the animal remembers what it is.

 

A state built atop a single subterranean commodity finds itself with barely any structural need to develop the institutions that broad-based production requires. It needs barely any educated workforce beyond the technicians who run the wells. It needs barely any independent judiciary to adjudicate contracts between competing domestic industries because competing domestic industries scarcely exist. It needs barely any representative political settlement because the revenue arrives from beneath the ground rather than from the taxed labor of citizens who might, in exchange for taxation, demand a voice. Political economists have documented that pattern across a hundred years of extractive economies on every continent that has produced a single dominant export commodity, and the pattern reads the same everywhere, a state grows immensely rich and immensely brittle at the same time, rich in the commodity and brittle in every institution that would let it survive the commodity's decline. Saudi Arabia stands as the purest specimen of that pathology ever produced, because the Saud family faced no colonial metropole extracting the surplus abroad, no foreign administrator skimming the revenue before it reached Riyadh. The family kept the entire sum for itself and built the cage with its own hands, bar by bar, palace by palace, out of money that arrived from beneath the sand rather than from the labor of anyone the family needed to answer to.

 

Consider what the tamer actually trains when he trains a tiger to sit, to roar on command, to allow a man to place his head inside its jaws for a paying crowd. He trains a suppression of instinct so total that the animal appears to have forgotten it is a predator. The training itself never actually removes the instinct underneath. It merely buries the instinct beneath thousands of repetitions until the audience, and eventually the trainer himself, mistakes suppression for genuine transformation. Fifty years of oil wealth performed the identical function on a captive population inside Saudi Arabia's own borders. Subsidized fuel arrived as the first sedative dose. 

 

Free education arrived next, offered without any accompanying labor market capable of absorbing the graduates it produced. Public sector employment came bundled as a bribe for political silence rather than as genuinely productive work. Zero income tax got framed as generosity, functioning instead as a mechanism to sever the link between taxation and representation that every modern parliamentary tradition on Earth was built upon. A population sedated for two generations mistakes its own sedation for contentment, exactly as an audience watching a tiger balance on a ball mistakes the animal's suppressed instinct for genuine tameness. The instinct waits patiently beneath both the tiger and the citizen. 

 

The cage worked exactly as designed for seventy years running. Oil was discovered beneath the peninsula in 1938. Aramco was nationalized in stages across the years between 1973 and 1980. A state apparatus constructed around the principle that legitimacy could be purchased directly, cash for quiescence, subsidized fuel and public sector employment in exchange for a population unlikely to ask who governed it or how. The theorists of rentier statehood have a name for that bargain and it survives contact with any Riyadh taxi driver's daily routine. What the bargain never managed to solve, what it remained structurally incapable of solving, was the question of what happens when the oil well runs less profitable than the ambition built on top of it. Every ruling family in the Gulf has understood that question was coming since the 1970s. Mohammed bin Salman's answer was Vision 2030, unveiled in 2016, a program to diversify the economy away from oil before oil diversified away from Saudi Arabia. The tragedy, and it stands as a tragedy in the technical sense, is that the plan to escape the resource curse was itself financed entirely by the resource, staffed entirely by a state apparatus capable of nothing beyond extraction logic, and imagined entirely as spectacle rather than production. The kingdom tried to out-build its way out of a rentier trap using rentier money and rentier methods. It amounts to Roy Horn training a bigger tiger to solve the problem of the first tiger.

 

Consider what that spectacle has become in recent years. NEOM, the flagship, the 500-billion-dollar centerpiece of the entire Vision 2030 architecture, has been gutted from the inside by its own directors. The Line, promised as a 106-mile mirrored city housing nine million residents in a car-free linear utopia, sits suspended on all substantial new work until after 2030, the very year the whole program was named for. Population targets for the broader NEOM zone, once set at 1.5 million residents by decade's end, were quietly cut to 300,000 two years ago and now sit at a mere 100,000, a reduction of roughly 93 percent from the original promise made to the world's business press in 2021. Trojena, the mountain resort engineered to host the 2029 Asian Winter Games in a country whose average summer temperature exceeds 113 degrees Fahrenheit, will see zero further investment until after 2030 either, and the Games themselves were postponed indefinitely in January. The Mukaab, a colossal cuboid skyscraper planned for Riyadh, sits cancelled outright. Contracts for tunneling and dam construction awarded to a South Korean consortium and to the Italian contractor Webuild were terminated in March. Saudi Arabia now faces roughly 16 billion dollars in termination and cancellation penalties simply for having promised things it lacked the capacity to build.

 

None of the foregoing happens in isolation from politics. The Iran war that erupted this year amounted to far more than a coincidence alongside the unraveling of Vision 2030. It accelerated the unraveling and exposed the fiction beneath it. Commercial shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz collapsed by more than 90 percent after the outbreak of hostilities. Iranian strikes on March 1 sent smoke over Jebel Ali port in Dubai while yachts fled the harbor on camera, the exact tableau of a Gulf luxury economy discovering in real time that luxury requires peace and peace was guaranteed by absolutely nobody. Qatar's Ras Laffan liquefied natural gas facility took a direct hit, cutting the country's LNG export capacity by nearly 17 percent for the next three to five years, a wound to a state whose government draws 80 percent of its revenue from that single gas field. Data centers in the UAE and Bahrain sustained damage severe enough that Amazon Web Services listed 31 disrupted services and told enterprise customers to migrate their operations elsewhere, an admission that the Gulf's bid to become the world's cloud-computing backbone had run directly into the region's oldest vulnerability, a war zone sitting beside a hostile neighbor across a 21-mile strait.

 

The tourism numbers alone tell the story of an empire's underlying fragility better than any position paper produced by a Gulf sovereign wealth fund's public relations office. In 2025, tourism contributed 178 billion dollars to Saudi Arabia's GDP, 70 billion to the UAE, 16 billion to Qatar. Those figures represented the entire non-oil diversification thesis given a dollar sign. Then came the first quarter of 2026 and arrivals across the Middle East fell by roughly 14 percent year on year, a decline the World Travel and Tourism Council estimated was costing the region's travel industry up to 600 million dollars per day at its peak. Forecasting models from Oxford Economics, published as the conflict intensified, showed a range running from an 11 percent contraction under a short conflict scenario to a 27 percent collapse should hostilities grind on for two months, with Gulf Cooperation Council states specifically facing a swing from an anticipated 8 percent expansion into a possible 26 percent decline. German cruise passengers found themselves stranded in the Persian Gulf while the strait sat closed to everything but vessels with Chinese or Russian ties. Hotels in the UAE and Qatar were forced to comp meals and rooms for travelers unable to leave. A region that spent fifteen years marketing itself to Europe and North America as a stable oasis discovered that stability, once it becomes a luxury product rather than a governing fact, evaporates the moment a missile lands within view of a five-star infinity pool.

 

The fiscal mathematics underneath the spectacle prove worse than the spectacle itself admits. Saudi Arabia's central government budget assumes a fiscal break-even oil price near 87 dollars a barrel. Once the full weight of Public Investment Fund obligations gets folded in, obligations to NEOM, to the Diriyah Gate heritage project, to a development package extended to Pakistan, to international bond service, the consolidated break-even climbs past 108 dollars a barrel by Bloomberg Economics' own accounting. Saudi output in April ran 3.4 million barrels per day below the OPEC+ quota, a gap the Hormuz disruption and damage to Eastern Province infrastructure rendered functionally impossible to close. The kingdom's finance ministry budgeted a 44-billion-dollar deficit for the full year of 2026 and burned through 33.5 billion dollars of it, 76 percent of the annual target, in the first ninety days alone. The Public Investment Fund itself entered the war holding roughly 15 billion dollars in liquid cash, the lowest level since 2020, against a portfolio exceeding 930 billion dollars in total assets and a sprawling network of commitments running from Lucid Motors to Nintendo to the Saudi Pro Football League. 

 

Aramco, the fountain from which every other institution in the kingdom ultimately drinks, generated a mere 18.6 billion dollars in free cash flow during the first quarter against a mandated dividend obligation of 21.89 billion, forcing the company to raise its own gearing ratio by 26 percent in three months simply to keep paying the government and the fund that depends on it. Here stands zero diversified economy weathering a shock. Here stands a single-commodity state discovering that every diversification project it built functioned as a further liability denominated in the very commodity it aimed to replace.

 

Every tiger act needs a supporting cast the audience never watches, the animal handlers who feed the beast, clean the cage, and absorb the risk the star performer is paid millions to appear immune from. 

 

The Gulf built its entire spectacle economy on a supporting cast of its own, and the story of that cast is the story of the region's actual character, stripped of the marketing budget. Qatar imported roughly two million migrant workers, a labor force nearly ten times the size of its own citizenry, to build the stadiums, roads, hotels, and metro lines for the 2022 World Cup. The workers arrived under the kafala sponsorship system, a legal architecture inherited from the era of British colonial administration that ties a worker's visa, ability to change jobs, and right to leave the country entirely to the permission of a single private employer. 

 

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the International Trade Union Confederation spent a decade documenting the results, passport confiscation, unpaid wages stretching for months, dormitories built for a fraction of the men crammed into them, and outdoor construction shifts conducted through desert afternoons exceeding 122 degrees Fahrenheit with rest breaks and hydration access left to the discretion of foremen paid to hit deadlines rather than protect lives. 

 

A Guardian investigation published in February of 2021 tallied more than 6,500 deaths among migrant workers from five South Asian nations alone during the decade of Qatar's World Cup preparation, a majority of them recorded under the vague administrative category of natural causes, a classification human rights investigators have repeatedly argued conceals heat stroke and cardiac failure brought on by extreme occupational heat exposure rather than examining it. Qatar's own organizing committee has acknowledged between 400 and 500 deaths connected to World Cup construction specifically, and just 3 deaths it classifies as directly work related among 37 total fatalities on stadium sites, a gap between official accounting and independent investigation that itself constitutes a form of testimony. This tragedy describes a workforce which a wealthy nation imported, then enslaved, worked past the edge of human tolerance in furnace heat, killed off, and buried under paperwork engineered to avoid a count. FIFA's own commissioned report in 2024 concluded that football's governing body bears responsibility for compensating the people who survived.

 

Saudi Arabia has watched this entire spectacle unfold next door and drawn precisely the lesson one would expect from a monarchy immune to embarrassment. The kingdom is scheduled to host the 2034 World Cup under the identical kafala architecture Qatar deployed, and Human Rights Watch's 2026 assessment finds migrant workers across Saudi employment sectors facing labor abuses that may amount to forced labor, with a large majority of migrant deaths still classified as natural and neither investigated nor compensated. Saudi authorities announced the formal end of kafala in mid-2025, a reform the kingdom's own state media promoted heavily to a Western audience already primed by NEOM's marketing department to believe in Saudi transformation, and yet the reform arrived alongside mass deportation sweeps that removed thousands of workers without due process and a labor penalty schedule that Amnesty International found had been quietly reduced for offenses including passport confiscation and denial of rest days. 

 

The kingdom executed at least 300 people in 2025, a figure surpassing every prior year on record and including at least two individuals convicted for crimes allegedly committed as children, along with a journalist put to death in June for the crime of speech. The same Public Investment Fund financing NEOM's cancelled towers finances the Saudi Pro Football League, LIV Golf, and a portfolio of global sporting and entertainment ventures that Human Rights Watch describes plainly as an instrument for laundering the kingdom's reputation abroad. 

 

The tiger act and the human rights record are the identical performance, staged for the identical audience, financed by the identical fund. Both depend on convincing spectators that the danger has been tamed. Neither one has actually removed a single tooth from the animal's jaw.

 

The United Arab Emirates and Bahrain complete the pattern rather than complicate it. The UAE's own construction and domestic labor sectors depend on a migrant population numbering in the millions, the overwhelming majority from South Asia and East Africa, working under labor conditions that United Nations special rapporteurs and international labor bodies have flagged for identical abuses, recruitment debts that function as indentured servitude before a single day's wage is earned, employer control over exit visas, and a judicial system offering migrant workers close to no independent recourse against an employer who withholds pay or confiscates documents. Every skyline photograph the Gulf uses to sell itself to Western tourists and investors, every mirrored tower and floating opera house and climate-controlled ski slope, rests on a foundation poured by men who arrived in debt, worked in furnace heat, and in thousands of documented cases never went home. The tiger performs the trick under bright lights for a paying crowd. The men who built the stage the tiger performs on are never once invited to take a bow.

 

The regional pattern of decline confirms the diagnosis rather than complicating it. The UAE's Masdar City, once marketed as the world's first zero-carbon city, has been quietly reduced to a modest neighborhood indistinguishable from a hundred other Abu Dhabi developments. Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait, and Qatar all logged double-digit tourism contractions in the same quarter Saudi Arabia did, because the entire Gulf built a single regional brand, safety, luxury, frictionless capital, on top of a single regional fault line that Iran demonstrated it could rupture whenever domestic politics in Tehran demanded a demonstration. Every Gulf monarchy spent the 2010s and early 2020s selling the same magic trick to the same audience of sovereign investors and international tourists, funded by the same underclass of imported labor stripped of the right to leave. Every one of them now watches the curtain fall on the same stage at the same moment, because the trick amounted to something other than a trick, it was a bet, and the bet assumed the region's oldest and most dangerous neighbor would remain permanently docile in exchange for nothing.

 

The energy question sits beneath the whole apparatus like the foundation beneath a mirrored skyscraper nobody finished building. Every serious projection of global decarbonization trajectories through mid-century assumes demand for Gulf hydrocarbons declines, gradually rather than catastrophically, but declines steadily enough that a petrostate needs three decades of disciplined reinvestment to convert oil rents into a durable, diversified successor economy. Saudi Arabia held that entire thirty-year runway in its hands. It spent the runway building a linear city nobody will live in at scale, a ski resort in a desert that regularly exceeds 122 degrees Fahrenheit, and a cube-shaped skyscraper it later cancelled outright. It spent the runway on spectacle rather than on the unglamorous, uncinematic work of building institutions capable of taxing, representing, and retaining a population once the oil money thinned. The war with Iran merely exposed a vulnerability decades in the making rather than creating one. The war simply arrived early enough, and violently enough, to make the vulnerability visible to everyone at once, tourists and bondholders and ratings agencies included, years before the kingdom's own internal projections expected the reckoning to land.

 

What happens next follows the logic of the tiger rather than the logic of the trainer. Montecore required zero decades of provocation before he acted. He required a single broken procedure, one moment where the choreography slipped and the animal's actual nature reasserted itself over the fiction imposed on top of it. The Gulf states have spent fifty years imposing an identical fiction on a region defined by resource scarcity, sectarian fracture, and a hostile theocratic neighbor across a 21-mile channel that carries a fifth of the world's oil supply. They called the fiction stability and sold it as a luxury good to European retirees and American private equity funds, financed by a workforce with no vote, no union, and in thousands of documented instances no path home. Iran's 2026 campaign supplied the broken procedure on the geopolitical stage. A sustained campaign of years proved unnecessary to make the point. A single public demonstration sufficed, cameras rolling on fleeing yachts and stranded German cruise passengers, to reveal that the barrier between the spectacle and the danger existed only in the marketing material.

 

Every absolute monarchy carries within its own design the seed of the exact contradiction now devouring the Gulf, and the contradiction runs deeper than a single war or a single cancelled skyscraper. A hereditary system of rule asks an entire population, citizen and migrant alike, to accept that political legitimacy descends from bloodline rather than consent, in a century when every surrounding current in global politics runs the opposite direction. Ordinary people the world over have spent the last decade plus demonstrating in the streets against exactly that proposition, that an accident of birth should determine who commands an army, controls a treasury, or decides which journalist gets executed and which dissident gets a decade in prison for a tweet. 

 

The Gulf monarchies have purchased forty years of insulation from that current using oil revenue as an anesthetic, spending lavishly enough on subsidized fuel and public housing and imported spectacle that the anesthetic occasionally resembled genuine legitimacy. Anesthetic always wears off eventually, no matter the dosage administered. Every population sedated by cash eventually confronts the arithmetic underneath the sedation, and the arithmetic in 2026 reads plainly: declining oil revenue, a collapsing tourism sector, a sovereign wealth fund scraping the bottom of its liquid reserves, and a flagship city that will never remotely resemble the promotional video that sold it to the world. A monarchy can survive indefinitely only if it can indefinitely fund the bribe that substitutes for consent. The moment the bribe shrinks, the population underneath it remembers what every subject of hereditary rule throughout history eventually remembers, that nobody consented to any of it in the first place.

 

A civilization built on caste, on a citizenry that rules by blood and a migrant underclass that dies in service of stadiums it will never sit inside, cannot simply modernize its way around the fact of its own foundation. You cannot mirror-glass a monarchy into a democracy. You cannot brand your way out of kafala. You cannot build enough floating opera houses to make an executed journalist stay executed only in the past tense rather than the present one. The world outside the Gulf's carefully lit promotional footage has spent the last two centuries dismantling precisely that arrangement everywhere the arrangement previously existed, monarchies falling to republics, empires falling to independence movements, colonial labor systems falling, however slowly and incompletely, to the minimum recognition that a human being amounts to something other than a fixture of infrastructure. The Gulf states are asking the twenty-first century to make an exception for them alone, on the theory that enough oil money and enough Formula One races and enough Messi appearance fees can suspend a historical current that has swallowed every comparable arrangement that came before it. History has never once granted that exception to anyone who asked nicely, and the reasoning behind why a hereditary petrostate financing its own executions with the same fund that finances its golf tour should expect to become the first exception remains conspicuously absent.

 

Mohammed bin Salman will likely survive the present season, propped up by American security guarantees, Chinese capital hungry for a foothold, and a domestic security apparatus with every rival center of power already purged after a decade of crackdowns dressed up as anti-corruption campaigns. But survival of the man differs entirely from survival of the project, and the project, rather than the individual, is what Vision 2030 asked the world to bet on. A monarchy that financed its escape from the resource curse by borrowing against the resource, that built its diversification thesis atop tourism and sports revenue evaporating at 14 percent a quarter and a sovereign fund down to 15 billion dollars in liquid cash, that built its stadiums and skylines atop a workforce numbering in the millions with no vote and, in thousands of documented cases, no way home, has demonstrated the one lesson every extractive empire eventually teaches its own ruling class free of charge. The zoo stays tame only for as long as nothing forces the question, and something, sooner or later, always does. 

 

Roy Horn spent forty-four years insisting he had rewritten a tiger's nature through proximity, discipline, and love. The tiger needed ninety seconds to correct him. The Gulf has had fifty years and several trillion dollars to rewrite the nature of its own economic, political, and moral foundations. Iran needed a single season of missiles to remind the region, and the bondholders now assessing the wreckage of NEOM's cancelled contracts, exactly how much of those fifty years amounted to theater and how much amounted to structure. History is already writing the same verdict about the caste system underneath the theater, one execution, one deportation sweep, one unmarked grave in a labor camp cemetery at a time. The stage lights remain switched on for now. The curtain hangs still short of falling all the way. But as the tiger walks, it remembers precisely what it is, a wild animal, and it has finally noticed that the men holding the whip were never as many, nor as strong, as the domestic crowd of the caged and the buried dead standing behind them. Soon, the tigers will break free.

Thursday, April 16, 2026

Piracy, Poverty and Oil in the Niger Delta

Richard Mellor

This is a free documentary. about oil and the people of the Niger Delta.  It's staggering when you think of the amount of profit the oil companies make and yet that wealth does not benefit the communities that live around it. The ecological and human catastrophe that is the product of this industry is staggering.  As you will see, the pirates have no means of subsistence other than to piracy. This is capitalism working is it? The so-called free market at work 

Humanity has the means to produce energy in a different way and use human labor power in a different way, but what drives production in the capitalist system is profit. No profit, no sewer system, no profits, no health care system, no profit, no investment in a safe drinking water system. Africa, and the world in general doesn't lack the means to change all this, but capitalism and those that propagate it will not leave the stage of history without being forced. We either change the system or it will drive us in to the abyss.

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Michael Roberts: All roads lead to stagflation

All roads lead to stagflation

by Michael Roberts

In its latest review of the impact of the Middle East conflict on the world’s economies, the IMF summed it up: “Although the war could shape the global economy in different ways, all roads lead to higher prices and slower growth.”

The global benchmark oil price is on course for its largest monthly rise on record in March, higher than in 1990 when Iraq invaded Kuwait. The conflict could end soon, as Trump and Rubio claim (presumably through with a deal with Iran in which the latter basically surrenders to US demands).  Or more likely there is a longer conflict stretching out into April and beyond, possibly involving US troops on the ground attempting to break Iran’s stranglehold over the Strait of Hormuz and searching for its nuclear stockpiles.  

Either way, crude oil prices will stay high for some time (and even more for prices of oil derived products, which have risen even more).

That means two things.  In the short term, global inflation is going to rise.  If the conflict lasts longer, then rising inflation will be joined by falling economic growth and the likelihood that even some of the major economies could slip into a slump.  Stagflation is certain and slumpflation is possible.

If oil and gas installations are permanently damaged or out of operation for a long time, then oil prices will rise further to reach $150/barrel—nearly three times pre-war levels—and natural gas prices would rocket to €120 MWh, or four times the pre-war rate. Such a rise would be comparable to the global supply shock of the late 1970s, which contributed to high inflation and global recession. France’s Finance Minister Roland Lescure reckons that 30–40% of Gulf refining capacity has already been damaged or destroyed by Iran’s retaliatory strikes, leaving a shortage of 11 million barrels a day on global oil markets. Lescure warned it could take up to three years to restore damaged facilities and several months to restart those that were urgently shut down.

Goldman Sachs economists offer three scenarios: the baseline scenario is six weeks disruption where crude oil price rises to $120/barrel before falling back to $80–100, with no lasting infrastructure damage. The second scenario is a medium-term war (ten weeks) where the crude price spikes to $140/barrel, staying at $95+ for a further ten weeks. This  would “scar” production permanently. The third scenario is apocalyptic (with ten weeks of war and lasting damage). Then the oil price rises to $160/barrel and never falls back below $100 for the foreseeable future because of damage to production facilities.

The OECD’s latest economic outlook has already downgraded forecasts for real GDP growth in the major economies this year due to the US-Israel war with Iran. All G7 economies except the US will now grow more slowly this year than previously forecast, with the UK reduced the most—from 1.2% to just 0.7%. The US economy will grow faster than forecast, according to the OECD, because of gains for its oil and gas exports. The OECD has also raised its forecast for inflation in the top G20 economies from a previous 2.8% to 4%. Argentina will have the highest rate of inflation in the G20 at 31% and China the lowest at 1.3%. US inflation will jump to 4.2% from the current 2.9%. If the war continues into the next quarter, expect these growth forecasts to be further reduced and inflation forecasts raised. 

Revised OECD growth forecasts

In my view, contrary to the OECD’s optimistic forecasts on US growth, the US will not escape this downturn. According to Royal Bank of Canada economists, if oil prices hold at $100/barrel, it could cut US real GDP growth by 0.8 percentage points (from the current average 2% a year to near 1%) and US inflation could reach 4% a year.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) forecasts that if energy prices remain persistently high, merchandise trade growth this year will slow from 1.9% to 1.5%. North American export growth will slow a bit, from an expansion of 1.4% to 1.1%, but Europe will be clobbered, with exports shrinking by 0.6% rather than growing by 0.5%. The hit to growth will be equally lopsided: while costly energy could boost GDP growth in North America this year to 2.5% (from a baseline of 2.3%), it would slow GDP growth in Asia to 3.1% from 3.9%. In Europe, a long war would bring the economy almost to a halt, slowing its expansion to 0.4% from a prior estimate of 1.6%. Analysis by the ECB also reckons that a long war would mean a deep, prolonged downturn in output with persistently higher inflation.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) forecasts that if energy prices remain persistently high, merchandise trade growth this year will slow from 1.9% to 1.5%. North American export growth will slow a bit, from an expansion of 1.4% to 1.1%, but Europe will be clobbered, with exports shrinking by 0.6% rather than growing by 0.5%. The hit to growth will be equally lopsided: while costly energy could boost GDP growth in North America this year to 2.5% (from a baseline of 2.3%), it would slow GDP growth in Asia to 3.1% from 3.9%. 

In Europe, a long war would bring the economy almost to a halt, slowing its expansion to 0.4% from a prior estimate of 1.6%. Analysis by the ECB also reckoned that a long war would mean a deep, prolonged downturn in output with persistently higher inflation. Already, Euro area annual inflation climbed to 2.5% in March, up from 1.9% in February.This marked the highest rate since January 2025, pushing inflation above the ECB’s 2% target as energy costs soared 4.9%, the first annual increase in nearly a year and the sharpest since February 2023, driven by the Middle East conflict.

Moreover, an energy price explosion does not just drive up overall inflation, at a certain point, it forces households and businesses to cut back on purchases and investments in order to meet energy bills.  It becomes a tax on growth.  Already, borrowing costs, as expressed in long-term government bond yields, are rising in all the major economies.

How high and for how long must energy (and other key commodity prices) rise for a slump to happen?  There are various estimates.  Paul Krugman, the Keynesian economist, reckons that the price elasticity of demand for crude oil is low — that is, even large price increases only cause small declines in demand (ie GDP). But this time could be different. He reckons that ‘low disruption’ (oil price $100-150/b) would reduce supply by about 8% in the US.  Medium disruption (oil price $120-230/b) would cause a fall of 12% in US economic growth.  High disruption (oil price $155-370/b) would take US supply down 16%. 

A prolonged conflict would hit the Middle East and Asia hardest. The Gulf states would lose their lucrative tourist traffic and airlines may be forced to bypass the area for global transit. The heady days of luxury lifestyles for foreigners would be over in these places. With large infrastructure projects in Gulf countries targeted by strikes, migrant construction workers will have less money to send home—a loss affecting households across the Middle East and South Asia. Workers in Gulf countries send home $88 billion in remittances annually. Countries such as Egypt, Pakistan, and India are the biggest recipients, amounting to tens of billions of dollars per year and accounting for more than half of all remittances received in these economies. Egypt, Pakistan, and Jordan each receive more than 4% of GDP from Gulf remittances.

Société Générale estimates that every $10 sustained increase in oil prices would widen India’s current account deficit—currently around 1% of GDP—by half a percentage point and would cut economic growth by 0.3%. At $100/barrel, that would mean a current deficit of 3% of GDP and a reduction in economic growth from a 2026 forecast of 6.4% to 5%. The Centre for Global Development (CGD), a Washington-based organisation, compiled a list of 17 countries most vulnerable to the shocks of the Iran war. Thirteen of those are African, including Angola, Nigeria, Egypt, Ghana and Ethiopia. In Asia, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka were deemed vulnerable, with Jordan singled out in the Middle East.

Taken together, higher oil prices and exchange rate devaluation will lead to a negative terms-of-trade shock for many countries, making it harder to service external debt and build foreign exchange reserves. Countries that have both high external debt service and low reserves will be especially at risk. For instance, Egypt may need to roll over more than $4 billion in outstanding eurobonds in the next year; Jordan and Pakistan may need to roll over around $1 billion apiece.

About 70% of Brazil’s and 40% of India’s urea imports—essential to their agriculture sector—come from the Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz. Gulf nations import most of their food: 75% of their rice comes through the strait, as well as more than 90% of their corn, soybeans and vegetable oil.¹² On top of all this, countries like Bangladesh, India and Pakistan will be hit by the inevitable drop in remittances from millions of their citizens working in Gulf countries as the war takes a toll on the regional economy.

Three countries will be less affected. The US has plenty of strategic stockpiles and, of course, its own domestic production. Although China relies for much of its oil from the Middle East (mainly Saudi Arabia), it has been building up its strategic stockpiles for just such events and because of worries about US sanctions. Last year, China imported about half of its crude oil and almost one-third of its liquefied natural gas from the Middle East. But it has aggressively built up strategic stockpiles of fossil fuels. China is estimated to hold the world’s largest emergency reserves of petroleum, totalling 1.3 billion barrels.

China has also made significant investments in electrification. Electricity accounts for 30% of the country’s energy consumption—about 50% higher than the US or Europe—making it more insulated from rising global oil prices. (With its rapid solar and wind build-out, it already accounts for roughly one-third of renewable energy generation capacity worldwide.) A diverse energy mix, multiple suppliers and access to routes that bypass the Gulf mean only about 6% of China’s total energy consumption is directly exposed to disruptions in the strait, estimates Goldman Sachs.

So China is well placed to deal with any shortages; and it can still turn to more oil imports from Russia and from South America, where it has been increasing supply in recent years to avoid the Middle East. And ironically, Russia will benefit from increased revenues from its energy exports.

One recent study of all wars since 1870 found that: “output falls by almost 10 percent in the war-site economy, while consumer prices rise by some 20 percent (relative to prewar trends).” And “the economies of belligerent countries and even those of third countries witness similarly unfavourable dynamics if they are exposed to the war site through trade linkages.” Output in close trading partners falls by 2 percent relative to trend. This war will easily surpass these averages if it continues much longer.

Easter week is shaping up as a crucial turning point in the war.  Will a deal be reached or will the US launch a new stage in the conflict with ground troops?  Either way, what is certain is that all roads lead to stagflation. 

Monday, March 16, 2026

The US Role in Iran: 1953 to 2026



From the Texas Reporter

 

Why many ordinary Iranians might sincerely see the United States as a terrorist nation


Try an exercise in perspective.


Imagine you are not an American reading this.

Imagine you are a shopkeeper in Tehran, a taxi driver in Isfahan, or a teacher in Shiraz. You are not a politician. You are not a soldier. You are just trying to run a business, feed your kids, and live your life.

Now imagine the history you grew up with.

🇮🇷1953 — Your democracy is destroyed

Your country once had a democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh.

He nationalized Iran’s oil industry so your country’s resources would benefit Iranians instead of foreign companies.

The United States and Britain respond by orchestrating the 1953 Iranian coup d’état.

Your elected government is overthrown.

The Central Intelligence Agency helps reinstall Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Shah.

He rules for decades as an authoritarian monarch.

From your perspective, the world’s most powerful democracy just destroyed yours.

🔒1960s–1970s — Secret police rule

Under the Shah, a feared secret police force called SAVAK emerges.

Opposition figures disappear.

Political prisoners are tortured.

Dissidents are watched and arrested.

The Shah is armed, trained, and supported by the United States.

So from your perspective, the repression in your country is being backed by a foreign power.

🔥1979 — Revolution explodes

Eventually the anger erupts.

The Iranian Revolution overthrows the Shah.

Soon after, the Iran hostage crisis begins when Iranian students seize the U.S. embassy.

Americans remember that moment as humiliation.

Iranians remember 1953.

Two nations remembering completely different histories.

💣1980s — War and tragedy

Then your country is invaded by Saddam Hussein, beginning the Iran–Iraq War.

Hundreds of thousands die.

The United States supports Iraq diplomatically and strategically during much of the war.

Then, in 1988, the U.S. Navy cruiser USS Vincennes shoots down Iran Air Flight 655.

290 civilians die.

Men. Women. Children.

To Americans, it is called a tragic mistake.

To many Iranians, it looks like their civilians were killed and the world moved on.

💰1990s–2010s — Sanctions crush the economy

Then come the sanctions.

Decades of them.

Financial sanctions. Oil sanctions. Banking sanctions.

Iran is locked out of the global financial system.

If you are that Iranian taxi driver or shopkeeper:

• your currency collapses

• medicine becomes harder to import

• inflation destroys your savings

• jobs disappear

And none of it was your decision.

⚛️2015 — A moment of hope

Then something changes.

Iran signs the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the nuclear deal.

Sanctions are lifted.

Frozen Iranian funds are released.

For a moment, ordinary people think the future might finally improve.

Businesses reopen.

Foreign investment begins returning.

Families start planning again.

🚫2018 — The deal is abandoned

Then the United States withdraws from the agreement under Donald Trump.

Sanctions snap back harder than before.

Iran’s currency crashes.

Inflation skyrockets.

Your life becomes harder overnight.

From your perspective, the most powerful country on Earth simply changed its mind and crushed your economy again.

🎯2020 — A national leader is killed

The United States kills Iranian general Qasem Soleimani in a drone strike near Baghdad International Airport.

Americans see him as responsible for attacks on U.S. forces.

But in Iran, millions attend his funeral.

To many Iranians, it looks like a foreign power assassinated one of their top national leaders.

💣2025 — The United States bombs Iran

In June 2025, the United States carries out major airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, using bunker-busting bombs and cruise missiles. 

From the perspective of an ordinary Iranian, the world’s most powerful military just bombed their country.

🔥2026 — War expands

On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launch a massive wave of strikes across Iran targeting military infrastructure and leadership. 

Hundreds of strikes hit missile bases, command centers, and other facilities across the country.

Civilian areas are also affected in the chaos of war.

Then the bombing continues.

U.S. strikes hit naval targets in the Strait of Hormuz, destroying Iranian mine-laying vessels during the conflict. 

And more recently, U.S. airstrikes targeted facilities on Kharg Island, the hub for most of Iran’s oil exports. 

From the perspective of that Iranian shopkeeper or taxi driver, the most powerful country on Earth is once again bombing their nation.

🌍So imagine how it looks from their side

You didn’t plan coups.

You didn’t write nuclear policy.

You didn’t control the government.

You just tried to live your life.

Yet the history you lived through includes:

• your democracy overthrown

• decades of sanctions crippling your economy

• civilian airliners shot down

• your leaders assassinated

• your country bombed repeatedly

• your oil exports targeted

• your currency collapsing again and again

So when Iranian leaders call the United States a terrorist nation, many Americans dismiss it as propaganda.

But if you were the one living through this history…

You might see the world very differently.

Understanding this perspective does not mean supporting Iran’s government.

But history looks very different depending on where you stand.

And if we want peace, we have to understand how the people on the other side see the story.