By Richard Mellor
AFSCME Local 444, retired
So Bernie Sanders is telling his supporters and former supporters “not” to vote for Jill Stein. We have the age-old scenario in place now, “Anyone but Trump”. I remember how the liberals reacted when Reagan won his first term. We were on the brink of a world war. Reagan would instigate a conflict between the US and the Soviet Union that would end it for all of us. What a deal the capitalist class has. There is only mass media coverage of their two parties and if one doesn’t work, the other is all there is.
So Bernie Sanders is telling his supporters and former supporters “not” to vote for Jill Stein. We have the age-old scenario in place now, “Anyone but Trump”. I remember how the liberals reacted when Reagan won his first term. We were on the brink of a world war. Reagan would instigate a conflict between the US and the Soviet Union that would end it for all of us. What a deal the capitalist class has. There is only mass media coverage of their two parties and if one doesn’t work, the other is all there is.
Those who took the Bernie bait and ran with it, uncritically
parroting his phrase, “political
revolution” at the top of their lungs, have a lot to answer for. Many of
these were those same seasoned liberals who predicted World War III in 1980.
There was a major war at home of course. Democrat Carter had begun deregulation
of the airlines and had used Taft Hartley against the miners in 1978 and Reagan
opened a decade long war against organized labor with his smashing of PATCO and
the firing of 11,000 air traffic controllers, banning them from working in the
industry for life. The stifling bureaucracy atop organized labor under the
leadership of the moribund Lane Kirkland did nothing, giving the bosses’ the
green light to step up the war against labor.
Despite heroic rank and file sacrifice, strike after strike was defeated
due primarily to the AFL-CIO leadership’s non-response.
Along with the liberals, desperate for a savior that could
return things to the good old days of the post World War II upswing, there have been
thousands upon thousands of workers and youth who genuinely believed in
Sanders. Many of them had no experience with previous left populist figures in
the Democratic Party like Jackson in 1984 and 88. These genuine supporters had
illusions in Sanders and illusions strengthened by the liberals who, despite
Sanders admitting that his “political
revolution” was nothing more than a voter registration drive, repeated his
slogan ad nauseum.
But many on the left, particularly some of the established socialist
organizations played a similar role as they salivated at the thought of
intervening in the Sanders campaign and leaving it with more members than they went in with. Some in insignificant sects called for them
to join their particular "revolutionary" group as if people move from no political activity to
revolutionary conclusions without first trying to reform the system, activity
that finds organizational expression in a mass reformist party not a
revolutionary one. Others simply called for a workers party or the need to
build an alternative, but this approach was not a viable one either given what was
developing.
As the campaign grew in strength it became more difficult to
determine the actual line. Socialist Alternative, the group from which I was
expelled was consistent in only one thing, strengthening illusions in Sanders.
It was difficult at times to determine what their actual position was. But what
is clear is that leading members of Socialist Alternative in Chicago and
Toronto said that if Sanders were to win the nomination they (Socialist
Alternative) would support him. This is unheard of in such circles, support for
a Democratic candidate, a candidate in a major capitalist party especially a
presidential one.
I received a comment from a friend on a listserve. The
comment is from a member of Socialist Alternative, a leading figure in it. He
writes:
“And another from a SAlt member "For all the ultralefts who had the condescending position that supporting Sanders would 'sow illusions in the Democrats' because you thought working class people are so mindless they would just bow before their leader Bernie when he shepherded them into the Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign, here is my evidence that you were dead fuckin wrong (link to video of Bernie being booed/heckled by his supporters) Workers have the capacity for independent, consistent political thought, it seems. Wow, who knew?"
“And another from a SAlt member "For all the ultralefts who had the condescending position that supporting Sanders would 'sow illusions in the Democrats' because you thought working class people are so mindless they would just bow before their leader Bernie when he shepherded them into the Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign, here is my evidence that you were dead fuckin wrong (link to video of Bernie being booed/heckled by his supporters) Workers have the capacity for independent, consistent political thought, it seems. Wow, who knew?"
I assume the numerous young people I saw crying at the DNC
when Sanders revealed his true self never had illusions in him. Their tears
were tears of joy as their true feelings were vindicated I suppose. No matter,
the name of the game is never to admit your mistakes and weave a web of lies and half truths. The SA has a perspective document on line from their recent
convention and, as always, how right they’ve been. How can you admit your
mistakes when you never make any.
So, in a round about way the Socialist Alternative arrives
at the Green party door after the illusionary bubble was popped last night.
They are correct of course to call for a vote for the Green Party and Stein in
November but the way they have arrived will in time cause a another serious crisis inside the group as it failed to prepare the Sanders supporters that joined it for what would actually happen. Sanders’
betrayal will lead many to drop out of political life in disgust, at least
temporarily but there will be others looking for somewhere to go and we on this
blog have said the Greens is it.
A major difference is that we said it from the beginning. We
have been very supportive and sympathetic to Sanders’ supporters but we have
been honest with them rather than strengthening any illusions they held that he
was actually going to lead something concrete. We never supported him from the
beginning and not only argued that they should vote for the Green Party but
join it, build it, work to make it a genuine party of working class people, trade unionists, environmentalists and
a socialist party. It was the only viable answer to those who we anticipated would want to fight
on, want to participate in the electoral process as well. We have not wavered
in our arguments that the Democratic Party, as a major party of global
capitalism is not a way forward for workers and the middle class and nor was
Sanders We said from the beginning that
Sanders would support Hillary Clinton.
This is what we wrote a year ago. Alternative
to Sanders and the Democratic Party
No comments:
Post a Comment