If you have opinions about the subject matter of posts on this blog please share them. Do you have a story about how the system affects you at work school or home, or just in general? This is a place to share it.
Black Agenda Report Review: "Vanguard of the Revolution."
"We will not try to fight fire with fire because all of the people that
FIRE is best put out with WATER. Therefore, the Black Panther Party will
not fight racism with racism. But we will fight racism with solidarity. We
will not fight capitalism with capitalism (Black capitalism), but with the
implementation of socialism and socialist programs for the people. We will
not fight U.S. government imperialism with more imperialism because the
peoples of the world and other races, especially in America, must fight
imperialism with proletarian internationalism." Black Panther Party Statement April 1969.
Another excellent piece below from the Black Agenda Report. I haven't yet seen this documentary, I am always very skeptical of anything dealing with the struggle of black Americans against racism and the violence that has accompanied it in US history as I am of any portrayal of working class history in general. The mass media, controlled by white capitalists, will not portray our history in any way that emphasizes the class struggle, or the need for class unity to overthrow capitalism and begin to eliminate racism. I just assumed this documentary would leave out Socialism in a documentary about the Black Panthers and Bruce Dixon seems to confirm this. R. Mellor
“Vanguard of the Revolution” is Liberal History, Strips and Omits Socialism from History of the Black Panther Party
by BAR managing editor Bruce A.Dixon
Stanley Nelson's documentary on the BPP is “history” by and for lazy
American liberals. He turns the BPP into a pop culture icon a T-shirt.
Nelson mentions guns hundreds of times, big naturals and swagger a few
dozen times but not the word “socialism” once in 2 hours. The BPP
described its Breakfast For Children and Free Medical Clinics every day
as “socialism” in person and in our newspaper, to each other and to the
neighborhoods we served.
I used to have a Che Guevara T-shirt. It was a pretty good shirt, but
it told me nothing about the man or his life's work. It had Che's face
on it, but by itself the face is just a pop culture icon, shorthand or
short-brain for everything you want to know, or everything think you
already know about it. That's what Stanley Nelson's film, Black
Panthers, Vanguard of the Revolution does to the Black Panther Party. He
made the movement of my youth an icon. A T-shirt.
On the plus side, it's a pretty good T-shirt. Vanguard of the
Revolution contains some great interview footage from Erika Huggins,
Elaine Brown, the freedom fighting Freeman brothers and Wayne Pharr, my
old comrade Michael McCarty and several others. On the minus side,
Nelson omits and obscures the domestic and global political context the
BPP came out of and thrived in. According to Vanguard of the Revolution,
the BPP arose out of black northern frustration after the passage of
civil rights legislation. It caught on due to the irresistible appeal of
its naturals, big guns, the murdermouthing rhetoric of Eldridge
Cleaver, downright sexiness, and black is beautiful, all of which earned
the BPP pop culture stardom. And pop culture stardom needs no further
explanation. Cue the music, fists in the air, and power to the people...
In Nelson's universe, the BPP splintered due to counterintelligence
operations launched against it by the government, it withered because of
brutal nationwide repression and was swamped with waves of police
informants. It died when rank and file members who did all the work
became exhausted, burnt out, and in some cases disillusioned by the
personal antics of BPP co-founder Huey Newton, which are examined at
some length.
Like my old Che T-shirt, Nelson's BPP has no historical context. The
film maker doesn't tell us, or maybe doesn't know himself what changed
about 1971 to cause the shrinkage of the BPP that led to its
concentration in Oakland by 1973 for the mayoral campaign of Bobby
Seale. He doesn't tell us why national liberation movements from
southern Africa to Vietnam to Palestine and the governments of
nonaligned Algeria and socialist Cuba reached out to and cooperated with
the BPP. Were they in love with our guns and nappy hairstyles too? The
best Nelson offers is that we were all “anti-American.”
Stanley Nelson is what Americans call a “liberal” and that's what
Vanguard of the Revolution is.... a liberal's take on the BPP. They were
black and beautiful, had some interesting things to say, and mostly
didn't deserve what they got. They were pop superstars, but stardom
comes and goes. American liberals like to pretend that the US global
doesn't exist, or is benign, and that its operations don't much affect
what goes on at home. And liberals know to steer clear of any favorable
mentions of socialism, or communism, or criticisms of capitalism.
Near the beginning of the film Nelson mentions the admonition to
black men that their fight is at home, not overseas. Here's some
context. When I was 18 in 1968, I too heard people repeating “Black man
your fight is at home, not in Vietnam.” I heard it from guys I knew a
couple years older fresh back from the US draftee army in Vietnam. They
told us the VietCong
--- Vietnamese guerillas fighting the US invaders in their country
would shout to them in English at night across the razor wire “Black man
why are you here? Your fight is at home!” That's the context, and we
talked about it the BPP political education classes and the BPP
newspaper. I learned soon after that their elder brothers, the Vietminh
had asked the same question the same way in French to African colonial
troops brought in to reassert French control over that country in the
1940s and 50s.
Unlike Stanley Nelson, those of us tuned into the movement of that
day were not just thinking inside the US. The wars against colonialism
and apartheid in Africa were on our mind, and the US war in Vietnam,
where the draftee army at the time made combat units disproportionately
black and brown made the black stake in US global empire something we
could not and did not ignore. The BPP and many radical blacks outside
the BPP saw ourselves as part of a trans-national, a global movement
against racist colonialism and capitalism, and for socialism. We said so
every chance we got, and there is plenty of archival footage to back it
up much of it just before and after the clips used in the film. It was
Nelson's choice not to use any of that, and not to query any of his
interviewees about it, unless that footage is still on the cutting room
floor.
The BPP tried to draw lessons from revolutions in China and the USSR,
from the Cuban experience at combating racism, from the writings and
speeches of African revolutionaries. We reached out to that global
movement as well as we were able, given our youth and inexperience, and
it reached back to us. The Cubans, Algerians, the revolutionary
movements around the world didn't open their doors to the Black Panther
Party because they liked our hairstyles or music or big talk or big
guns. They didn't do it, as someone in Nelson's film said with a
straight face, because we were “anti-Americans”. They did it because
they recognized the BPP as part of that global movement.
When we talked about the BPP's Breakfast for Children program we
called it socialism. That was how we explained it and the party's food
giveaways and free medical clinics to the people in the neighborhoods
and that was how we understood it. This too was all over the BPP
newspaper, but Nelson missed or omitted that too. In our poitical
education classes, many of which I led in Chicago, we studied Marx and
Engels and Lenin, Amilcar Cabral and Paulo Freire, Frantz Fanon, Che
Guevara, the daily newspapers and our own Black Panther newspaper. Our
paper had articles from North Korea, from South Africa, from China and
Vietnam.
The BPP wasn't destroyed by direct police repression either. To tell
the truth we never had more support than in the weeks after Fred Hampton
was murdered in Chicago, and the LAPD beseiged the Southern California
office in Los Angeles.
Nelson doesn't explain why the BPP had wide support among whites,
especially young whites up till 1971. The reason wasn't pop culture
stardom, big naturals, guns and big talk. It was the draft and the US
war in Vietnam. The draft de-legitimized the government among young
whites to the extent that many were willing to support a black
revolutionary movement which also denounced the war, the draft and
militarism along with much else at home. When the draft ended in 1971
and the masses of US troops came home, white support for the BPP
evaporated like snow in the springtime, and along with burnout and such
led to the decision to concentrate the organization's remaining
resources in Oakland for Bobby Seale's mayoral run.
Stanley Nelson is no doubt a fine film maker, and for all I know a good guy. What he ain't is a historian of 20th
century radical movements. He renders the BPP through his own liberal
lens and blind spots, stripping it of historical and political context
to get the icon that liberals think explains everything leaving out the
unpalatable politics. Vanguard of the Revolution is a T-shirt. A really
good one, but a T-shirt. I don't blame the man, he's not alone. Henry
Louis Gates in his TV offering did the same. This kind of stuff is
pretty much the liberal canon when it comes to black history.
Mistaking Vanguard of the Revolution for a real history of the BPP
puts the film maker's liberal blinders on young black activists looking
for clues. It directs them away from questioning capitalism, from
investigating socialism, from appreciating the influence from and upon
the global movement for peace, justice and socialism upon our movement
here inside the US. With this stuff as the historical standard it's no
wonder a generation of activists are seeking individual validation and
stardom, Facebook likes and Twitter followers instead of questioning
real authority and educating themselves and their communities to
struggle for power.
If we want to understand the meaning of black radical movements like
the BPP we'll need to hear from some black radical historians. So far
nothing comes close to the grasp of the BPP, its rise, fall, its intent,
impact, context and historical significance exhibited in Waldo Martin
and Joshua Bloom's Black Against Empire. It's a high standard to meet,
but it shouldn't be impossible.
I've already got a BPP T-shirt I can wear. I don't need another one that lasts an hour and 55 minutes.
Bruce A. Dixon is managing editor at Black Agenda Report, and a
member of the state committee of the GA Green Party. Reach him via email
at bruce.dixon@blackagendareport.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment