Ah! Sweet Commerce. |
By Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired
Back in December 2011, Hilary Clinton visited Myanmar in the wake of the military dictatorship’s introduction of reforms. Ms. Clinton was accompanied on that visit by corporate leaders looking for lucrative investment opportunities and cheap labor. Military dictatorship’s can be a bit too unstable for investors looking for profits sometimes, but with a firm grip on dissent and unions they can be good business partners.
Back in December 2011, Hilary Clinton visited Myanmar in the wake of the military dictatorship’s introduction of reforms. Ms. Clinton was accompanied on that visit by corporate leaders looking for lucrative investment opportunities and cheap labor. Military dictatorship’s can be a bit too unstable for investors looking for profits sometimes, but with a firm grip on dissent and unions they can be good business partners.
US president Barack Obama has just finished a 5-day visit to
East Africa with the same goal in mind. “Africa is the final frontier in the global
rag trade—the last untapped continent with cheap and plentiful labor.”,
the Wall Street Journal wrote prior to Obama’s
exploratory mission. What
with Chinese workers waging successful struggles for higher wages and the
Cambodians following suite, Africans are in the sights of the garment industry
investors.
Even the poverty stricken garment workers in Bangladesh who earn at least $67 a month are too expensive for the likes of WalMart and other Western retailers. PVH, the parent company of Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger and VF, parent company of brands that include Wrangler, Lee and Timberland, are looking to descend on Africa like vultures on a dying animal. JC Penney and Levi Strauss have been moving production to Africa as well. Ethiopia is a particularly attractive location as economic growth has been pleasing Wall Street and the country has no minimum wage. Ethiopian garment workers were earning $21 a month as of last year according to the Ethiopian government. Despite lacking in infrastructure and a relatively untrained (for sewing garments) labor force, the apparel companies are “still drawn to the cheap labor and inexpensive power…” the WSJ writes.
Even the poverty stricken garment workers in Bangladesh who earn at least $67 a month are too expensive for the likes of WalMart and other Western retailers. PVH, the parent company of Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger and VF, parent company of brands that include Wrangler, Lee and Timberland, are looking to descend on Africa like vultures on a dying animal. JC Penney and Levi Strauss have been moving production to Africa as well. Ethiopia is a particularly attractive location as economic growth has been pleasing Wall Street and the country has no minimum wage. Ethiopian garment workers were earning $21 a month as of last year according to the Ethiopian government. Despite lacking in infrastructure and a relatively untrained (for sewing garments) labor force, the apparel companies are “still drawn to the cheap labor and inexpensive power…” the WSJ writes.
The urgency for Obama as the representative of US capitalism,
is catching up with the Chinese who have been investing in Africa as well as
Latin America, a region that US imperialism considers it’s own back yard. Obama
“celebrated
the ingenuity of African business leaders”, the “African” people he is most
interested in, and his last day was spent speaking to the African Union
at its headquarters in Addis Ababa, the first American President to do so. One
can only imagine the reaction of the arrogant US bourgeois at their elected
representative speaking to a prominent African organization in their
headquarters built for them by the Chinese.
Naturally, like Hilary Clinton, John Kerry and all the spokespersons
of the US 1% do in their taxpayer funded travels around the globe on behalf of
US corporations, Obama lectured the Africans on the need, “to end widespread government corruption and advance democracy and human
rights…” the
WSJ reports. Corrupt as the various
African governments may be, (crony capitalism is how the US media describes
corruption in former colonial states) they would be hard pressed to outdo
Washington in the corruption category unless one thinks the practice we
Americans call lobbying is not bribery. The world’s working classes must have a
good laugh at that one, and even more so at Obama’s jibe at the Chinese
presence on the continent.
“America’s approach to development—the central
focus of our engagement with Africa—is focused on helping you build your own
capacity to realize that vision,” Mr. Obama told his hosts as they no doubt
held back laughter. It’s OK though, the representatives of African capitalism
he was talking to have no qualms taking a few bucks thrown their way. But Obama wasn’t done and had a go at the
Chinese, “But economic relationships can’t simply be about building other
countries’ infrastructure with foreign labor or extracting Africa’s natural
resources…” he tells the African elite,
“….real economic partnerships have to be a good deal for Africa—they have to
create jobs and capacity for Africans.”
We are expected to believe that the motive of US capitalism
is purely egalitarian and honorable, helping the African people stand on their
own two feet, no strings attached-----unlike those Chinese. Wow, a quick left
hook to the Chinese in the same breath, “real
economic partnerships have to be a good deal for Africa.”? The British
spread good cheer throughout the world too for a couple of centuries,
traversing the globe helping nations and their people’s stand on their own two
feet. I’m not sure Africans would consider the British to have been such
egalitarians or that US capitalism is either.
Workers need to take the statements of the journals of
capitalism like the Wall Street Journal more seriously. All the chatter from
the representatives of capital about workers’ rights and the need for
multilateral agreements to include protections for workers is phony, as phony
as Obama’s comments to the African elite on his visit. It is the phony diplomacy of thieves. Back
home these same forces are waging a vicious war against US workers and our
wages, rights and benefits that have taken a century or more to win. With
capitalist Globalization and with it the collapse of Stalinism and opening up
of China, US capital now has access to huge pools of cheap labor with which US
workers are expected to compete. The
only result of this competition between workers in different nations as well as
within one country is for us all to go down together. The majority of industrial workers today are
not in Europe or the US but in Asia, and more than 50% of them are women. The
road to our emancipation is international solidarity and unity in action
against global capitalism.
The owners of capital care not where the labor power they
purchase comes from. All that matters to them is that they can extract surplus
value from it. It is the source of their profits and the cheaper the better.
They traverse the globe in the search of the most lucrative climes, from
Mexico, to China, to Cambodia, Vietnam and now Africa is a place their capital
might call home. Capital truly has no borders and cares not which nationality
of workers it exploits. The sub heading to one of the articles linked to here
make it clear: “From H&M to Calvin Klein, brands look to Ethiopian factories where
pay is as low as $21 a month.”
As US workers we are asked to help our manufacturers compete
against their foreign rivals for global market share. We are told that if we
want the jobs to remain in the US we have to cost less, our labor power is too
expensive, our rights and benefits, and general working conditions, with more
and more exceptions, are a hindrance to profits so they have to go, we have to
be able to work faster for less money.
As I write, the IMF is pressuring the Europeans to do the same and institute
more labor reforms, worker protections must go and it must become easier to
fire workers. As is so often the case,
the productivity of US workers is held up as the benchmark that must be met but
it is rarely mentioned that US workers work longer hours than workers in other
advanced capitalist economies and with fewer social benefits.
“Africa will need to generate
millions more jobs than it’s doing right now. And time is of the essence. The
choices made today will shape the trajectory of Africa, and therefore the world,
for decades to come.”,
Obama told his hosts who he expects will be faithful servants of the US 1% on
the continent, supplying plentiful cheap labor and safe conditions for profit
making. This is a Utopian dream and not
possible under capitalism
The
African masses have heard all this before and as far as the Chinese go, Obama
might be a little late. Being bogged down in predatory corporate wars in the
Middle East and beyond, US imperialism is a little stretched and the US
taxpayer somewhat tapped out. The US taxpayer also funds a huge military
industrial complex which is good for investors in that industry but a drain on
the rest of us. Obama hints that private capital may step to the plate for
Africa but that could have happened in the past and hasn’t despite starvation,
poverty and poor health due primarily to the lack of infrastructure and public
health projects. Private capital,
despite its representatives being successful in driving down the standard of
living in the US, is unwilling even to rebuild the
US’s crumbling infrastructure, what Business Week once described as the “Third Deficit”.
It doesn’t take rocket science as they say, to figure out
that capitalists don’t shift production to these countries in order to increase
the standard of living of workers there. The trade union leaders in the US
while paying some lip service to international solidarity between workers
willingly capitulate to the interests of the 1% when it comes to it as they
have the same worldview seeing no alternative to the market. The Team Concept,
the idea that workers and bosses have the same economic interests dominates
their thinking not only domestically as workers in different workplaces are
forced in to competition with each other in order to help “their” immediate
employer gain market share over their rivals, but internationally as well. In
either case, accepting this philosophy is a disaster.
The “American”
capitalists salivating at the thought of Ethiopian labor power at $21 a month
would be quite willing to keep their capital and the jobs in the US if we are
prepared to outbid the Ethiopians when it comes to wages and working conditions;
how patriotic of them. Either way, we are heading down the same path anyway as
our employment choices, (if we are working at all) boil down to minimum wage
opportunities or working three jobs to make ends meet.
Working class solidarity at home and internationally is the only alternative to this mad rush to the bottom.
1 comment:
The blatant bankrupted thinking of the union leaders is again openly being displayed as the Communication Workers of America (CWA) and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) betray their members, again. A quick Google search on the potential East Coast Verizon Strike shows the team concept on full display. Despite billions in profits. Verizon is demanding concessions from workers in order to remain "competitive". The union leadership received strike authorizations last week only to back-out of a work-stoppage at the last minute last night as workers were already heading to picket lines. The union leaders were quoted this morning with more of their toothless rhetoric. Something to the effect that, "our members will continue to "fight" on the job for a "fair" contract." In other words we have no alternative to offer and or are unwilling to confront the boss and we we simply want the company to be "fair". Verizon has made clear thousands of non-union outside workers and managers are ready to scab. It's clear the union leadership have no alternative other than capitulating to the millionaire bosses , it's only a matter of time before the betrayal occurs.
The question is how long until the workers realize their union leadership must be confronted and a battle with their own "leaders" needs to happen in addition to battling the bosses.
Post a Comment