That's me bottom right Baghdad 1971** |
By Richard Mellor GED*
Afscme Local 444, retired
I’m just on a bit of a rant here again after watching the
news. I commented last week on the “Migrant” crisis in Europe. We’ve all seen the pictures of Syrian’s,
babes in arms, crawling underneath barbed wire fencing trying to get in to
Hungary from Serbia.
On the CBS national news tonight the subject came up again
as European leaders are planning on meeting to discuss what to do about the
worst refugee crisis in Europe since World War Two. A Syrian named Mohammad was
interviewed as the reporter explained that these migrants were fleeing “poverty and conflict in the Middle East and
Africa.”
I have to stress again that this is not news in the sense
that we are brought information about events and with that information we can
perhaps draw conclusions about what is happening in the world and how we can or
should respond. It’s just the opposite.
We learn nothing about the causes of things at all. We are simply passive listeners or viewers of
the results of decisions that we play no active part in making. It is pure propaganda.
In all the reports on the European migrants, the term “imperialist aggression” is certainly
never used and the failed and brutal attack on Iraq by US imperialism and it’s
stooges gets no mention either. But the
war and poverty in the Middle East and Africa is a direct result of imperialist
aggression. I traveled by train from
Istanbul through Turkey, Syria and down to Baghdad back in 1971. I stayed there
a bit and then took the bus to Basra. I
was never harmed or attacked despite almost everyone I met being Muslim, so
obviously Islam is not the problem. There were not hundreds of thousands of
Syrian’s or Iraqi’s trying to get in to Europe at the time either. I walked
around in Baghdad and people were living their lives in a normal way. Women
were in government and many of them walked around without face coverings of any
sort. It was the most secular of the regimes in the region and women were in
the government.
An Iraqi exile I met in London once told me that as long as
you weren’t involved in politics, you were OK.
He was angry at the western governments and the US/CIA in particular for
financing and propping up the Saddam Hussein regime. Any effort to topple him, he said, meant the
reformers were coming up against his friends in Washington. The US propaganda
about invading Iraq and freeing the country for democracy holds no water with
these people.
I generally refer to those immigrants from Central America
that face all sorts of hardship and death trying to get in to the US as “economic refugees” and I think this is
a more accurate term that should also apply to those entering Europe from the
Middle East; they're not simply "migrants". Mexicans and other Central
Americans don’t risk their lives heading north because they don’t like home.
They are forced to survive, and if we want to understand the origins of this
migration and the source of the crisis in their countries we have to understand
history. Like the mass media’s reporting
on the European situation, the true history of US and European imperialism’s
role in this part of the world is not part of the nightly news when the issue
of immigration comes up. We are not reminded day in day out that NAFTA, a
government policy that decimated US towns as production was moved to Mexico
where human beings are cheaper and unions weaker, drove millions of Mexican
subsistence farmers off their land forcing them to head north for work.
And if we want to understand how come there’s so many Irish
Americans although Ireland is a very small country, we have to study the
history of British colonialism there.
The new Pope apologized for the Catholic Church’s role in
the plunder of this “New World” but didn’t go in to too much detail or as far
as to offer to return all that gold. They'll have a long wait as Vatican Inc. doesn't move too fast.
The reason the issue of class is so buried in US mass
culture is that it is a very dangerous road to hoe for the class that governs,
that rules society and makes the important decisions that affect our daily
lives. By accepting there are classes in society we are also led to understand
that these classes are based on something more than just a set of abstract
ideas, that one class has more wealth and that means more social power as money
is social power in capitalist society.
We begin to understand that one class owns the auto and transportation companies, the agricultural and food production business and the communication companies and of course, the mass media. In other words, they own the means of production. We begin to see more clearly that the political parties that dominate represent class interests. That the politicians we are asked to vote for who roll up their sleeves and head out in to the communities every four years have nothing in common with us. We see as workers that we do not own these things and never will.
We begin to understand that one class owns the auto and transportation companies, the agricultural and food production business and the communication companies and of course, the mass media. In other words, they own the means of production. We begin to see more clearly that the political parties that dominate represent class interests. That the politicians we are asked to vote for who roll up their sleeves and head out in to the communities every four years have nothing in common with us. We see as workers that we do not own these things and never will.
Recognizing that a certain class of people own the means of
manufacturing the commodities we need to live our lives, leads us to understand
that they also own the means of manufacturing and distributing the dominate
ideas in society, the universities and education system and the mass
media. They do not want us to understand
why social events occur. It is not just
global events, they don’t teach working class history, the history of their own working classes. The ruling class of
every nation and era teaches the history of that class and its rise to power
and all ruling classes, the slaveowners of antiquity, the feudal aristocracies
of Europe or Asia, teach that the system they govern is the apex of human
civilization. There is this romanticized
version of history from the ruling class’s point of view.
Here in the US especially, the issue of race is used to
obscure the fact that classes exist at all. The working class here is called
the middle class. It is as if there is only the rich, the poor and the middle
class, there are no workers. The news
report mentioned above, reported on the killing in Texas of a trooper. The
assailant came from behind and executed him, apparently without provocation.
The killer was black and the cop white and a police official has implied that
the Black Lives Matter movement is partially responsible for creating a mood
that encourages this sort of response.
The report showed a clip of a peaceful rally of what the
reporter referred to as, “all races”. What
does this mean? How many “races” are there? In the US, white is a race, something I was
unaware of before I came here. As I have said before, I was asked my race when
I entered the country and I said, “English”.
I was corrected and discovered I was “white”.
Anyway, does this mean that the world’s races are: Black, White, Yellow, Red,
Brown, off white, coffee colored, the olive skinned race: and I can’t think of another one? I’m
confused now.
Perhaps the local news here might help me. Oh, here’s a good
one. It appears that Trump has a bit of
a competitor for the Republican candidate for president of the US. He’s a guy named Carson, a black guy or
African American for people who prefer that term. It seems his popularity has
surged in the polls and I just saw a clip of a campaign meeting of his
supporters in Iowa.
Here’s why one woman is supporting his candidacy, “Carson says the same things as Trump but
he’s a kinder gentler guy.”
In his interview with the runner up for imbecile of the decade award, Sarah Palin, Trump said that there are “millions” of people coming across our southern, borders, a statement that has no truth in reality.
Yes, Trump says a lot of kind, gentle things.
In his interview with the runner up for imbecile of the decade award, Sarah Palin, Trump said that there are “millions” of people coming across our southern, borders, a statement that has no truth in reality.
Yes, Trump says a lot of kind, gentle things.
* I see a lot of people who blog or write putting their
qualifications after their names like, Ph.D, MA BA and stuff like that. I
have never wanted to boast about my qualifications as I always want people to
look at me as just an ordinary guy but I worked so hard for my GED when I came
to the US that I should be proud of it.
** We stayed at this man's house as he rented a room to us. I have no idea whether he was Sunni or Shia or anything like that, a Dolm(taxi) us took us there from Baghdad station. The Iraqi's were good to us. I often wonder if he is still alive. The photo was taken on the roof of his house.
No comments:
Post a Comment