Klobuchar Threatens the Tech Giants. But they're Not Scared Source |
Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired
In the early part of the 20th Century, US president Theodore
Roosevelt went after big business, or the “Trusts”
as the certain monopolies were called. I use the term “certain” because Roosevelt was not opposed to corporations, he made
it very clear there were good corporations and bad ones. FDR, who was
Theodore’s cousin also went after corporations that threatened monopoly and the
stifling of competition among capitalists. They both basically believed that
the government through legislation and anti-trust laws should curb the excesses
of capitalism and corporations that didn’t play by the rules.
They couldn’t have
imagined the concentrated power and control of the market that some
corporations have today. As Michael Roberts pointed out on this blog recently, “Alphabet
(Google) – the world’s largest search engine; Amazon – the world’s largest
online distributor; Apple – the world’s largest computer and mobile phone
manufacturer; and Facebook – the world’s largest social media…” earned a
staggering $39 billion in the second quarter of 2020 in the midst of a global
economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The global mining company Vale SA based in Brazil has just been fined $7bn as
compensation for the collapse of the Brumadinho dam in that country that killed
270 people and, “….destroyed almost 300
acres of native forest and polluted 200 miles of the local Paraopeba River,
rendering it useless as a water supply for the state.”. (New York Times, 2-04-2021) The company had ignored warnings from its own
employees that the dam was leaking. There was the usual negligence; these
things are never accidents.
Four years earlier, Vale was
ordered to pay $1.55 billion compensation for the collapse of the Mariana dam
that spilled contaminants in to the river that was the main drinking water for
cities downstream. The environmental damage was even worse than Brumadinho
according to reports.
We don’t have to look or
think very hard to see that capitalism is driven to monopoly by its internal
dynamic and cannot be restrained by government or legislation, certainly not to
the point where poverty or environmental destruction is significantly
curtailed. And any halting of abuse is temporary at best. These giant global concerns have more power
than the state in many of the countries in which they operate, certainly in the
case of former colonial countries like Brazil where the rainforest, critical to
human survival on this planet, is being destroyed on a daily basis to make room
for private farming particularly beef production.
Amy Klobuchar is the new
Democratic head of the Senate Antitrust subcommittee and like both Roosevelts
she’s going after the big guys, the bad ones that is. She’s introducing new
legislation that will prevent companies, “…that,
dominate their sectors..”, from merging with or buying other companies if
it stifles competition..
The Wall Street Journal
points out that this means it is now the
government’s responsibility, “…. to prove
that a merger substantially lessens competition.”. One might ask how a company
that dominates a sector and buys another company in that sector cannot but
increase its market power over others therefore stifling competition. But one
thing I do know is that the corporation will have the proof that it doesn’t and
the government will be satisfied. Even if it can’t prove it, the capitalists
involved will find a way to make it work.
Klobuchar’s bill will cost
taxpayers $484 million by increasing funding for the antitrust division of the Justice
Department and another $651 million for the Federal Trade Commission. This is
more wasted funds to the tune of $1 billion because, as history shows,
capitalism cannot be reformed to the point that it works in the interest of
workers and the middle class or that it can ever safeguard and protect the
environment. The overriding factor in the capitalist mode of production is
profit.
As for fines for wrongdoing,
anti-competitive activity, or illegal practices as is normally the case, even
if they amount to billions of dollars like those at Vale SA and BHP, the Anglo
Australian mining company involved with Vale, or BP in the Gulf of Mexico,
these global giants factor these things in and in one way or another the costs
will be passed on to the workers as workers and consumers.
The root cause of the problem
is the private ownership of these giant concerns, what are best referred to as
the commanding heights of a national and/or global economy. As privately owned companies,
production is set in motion on the basis of profit for the small sectors of
society that own them rather than the needs of society as a whole. There is an inherent
contradiction here.
The only solution that can
ensure such disasters can be avoided, is taking the
productive forces that produce the necessities of life in modern society out of
private hands and in to the collective ownership, control and management of the
working class as a whole. In this way, what we produce and how we produce it
can be determined in a planned, rational way based on the needs of society as a
whole and in harmony with the natural world rather than in conflict with it. Our continued existence
on this planet depends on it.
So Senator Klobuchar’s
efforts are nothing new and will in the main achieve nothing of any consequence
other than to create a new layer of bureaucracy through a $1 billion infusion
of taxpayer cash. As a representative in one of the two parties of capitalism,
a way to maintain the status quo as far as profits go will always be found.
Nothing proves that more than
what I wrote about the present situation with the tech giants earlier. The Tech
companies are being investigated by the US Congress for illegal activity but as
they are being investigated they are handing over millions in bribes (lobbying)
to the investigators. Facebook spent $20 million bribing politicians in 2020 an
18% increase from 2019 and Amazon, spent $18 million in 2020 an 11% increase
from 2019. More on this here.
They don’t throw money around
like that for nothing.
The working class in the US
has no political voice and no political party. Millions of U.S. workers for
multiple reasons do not see themselves as a class with our own distinct culture
and economic interests and the obsession with identity politics adds to this
confusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment