Monday, January 22, 2018

Faults Aside, the Women's March Was a Good Thing

We reprint this article from the Guardian for the interest of our readers. There are some important points made in it.  It is nauseating to see the Scarlet Johanson's and Whoopi Goldberg's speaking and billionaires like Tom Steyer. I didn't see it but surely Oprah spoke somewhere she is eying the White House. The movement is clearly influenced strongly by the Democratic Party and the liberals, it's organizers perhaps did not link the issue of racism or jobs and such to the general attack on women as strongly as they should which would have gotten the ear of the black community and other communities of color. The trade union hierarchy makes no serious attempt to bring union members out as there is nothing they are more terrified of than their own members moving in to struggle.

Despite all these negative influences and the hypocrisy of Democratic Party hacks and celebrities that couldn't give a damn about women and young girls or anyone else that have been the victims of Obama's drones, Hilary Clinton's warmongering, Bush's wars, Trumps missiles or Israels brutality, that millions turned out is a huge positive. Movements do not come ready made, and even so, out of the hundreds of thousands there will be many that feel the same way, that wished things were different, but these and others like them will be the changing presence. The marches are a slap in the face to the present administration of the the predator Trump and that is a good thing. Imagine if they had been very small, it would have cast a sombre mood over society.  We will see much more in the future as the crisis of capitalism deepens and the trade unions will not be exempt. At some point there will be a breach in the dam and the obstacle of the trade union leadership and its relationship it has built with bosses based on labor peace (at the expense of the rank and file members of course) will begin to unravel.RM


Think the Women's March wasn't radical enough? Do something about it

It might not have been as black, brown or working class as many might have liked. But criticizing it from the sidelines doesn’t help anyone
The scale of the attack is as deep as it is wide, and this means that we will need a mass movement to confront it. To organize such a movement necessarily means that it will involve the previously uninitiated – those who are new to activism and organizing. We have to welcome those people and stop the arrogant and moralistic chastising of anyone who is not as “woke”.

The women’s marches in Washington DC and around the country were stunning, inspiring and the first of a million steps that will be needed to build the resistance to Trump.

But look around social media, and you can read critiques and even denunciations of the marchers: where were all of these people before? Why are they only getting involved now? Why doesn’t the march have more radical demands? Why did march organizers, who are politically liberal, allow only ... liberals to speak?

All this is a sign of a political immaturity that continues to stunt the growth of the American left.


Were liberals on the march? Yes! And thank God. The movement to resist Trump will have to be a mass movement, and mass movements aren’t homogeneous – they are, pretty much by definition, politically heterogeneous. And there is not a single radical or revolutionary on Earth who did not begin their political journey holding liberal ideas.
Advertisement

Liberals become radicals through their own frustrating experiences with the system, but also through becoming engaged with people who became radical before them. So when radicals who have already come to some important conclusions about the shortcomings of existing systems mock, deride or dismiss those who have not achieved the same level of consciousness, they are helping no one.
This isn’t leadership, it’s infantile. It’s also a recipe for how to keep a movement tiny and irrelevant. If you want a movement of the politically pure and already committed, then you and your select friends should go right ahead and be the resistance to Trump.
 
Should the marches have been more multiracial and working class? Yes! But you are not a serious organizer if that’s where your answer to the question ends. The issue for the left is how we get from where we are today to where we want to be in terms of making our marches blacker, browner and more working class. Simply complaining about it changes nothing.

There will no effective movement against Trump that doesn’t directly confront the issue of racism. It has to be front and center, and it seemed to me that the march organizers took that question seriously and made genuine efforts to shift shortcomings in their original approach.

The organized turnout of unions for the Washington DC demonstration was much smaller than it should have been. But at least some sections of the labor movement did feel the pressure from their own membership to devote greater resources to mobilization in the final weeks, and plenty of union members got themselves to the march as individuals and with rank-and-file members. That’s something for the left to build on in making labor central to the anti-Trump resistance.

The women’s marches were the beginning, not the end. What happens next will be decided by what we do. Movements do not come to us from heaven, fully formed and organized. They are built by actual people, with all their political questions, weaknesses and strengths.
Advertisement

If the left doesn’t engage with the aim of contending for leadership and influence, we just concede these forces to the Democrats and liberals, who will certainly try to confine the new upsurge of opposition to the political limits they want to define.

The point isn’t to bury our arguments. If we want to win people to more radical politics, we must learn how to make our arguments while operating in political arenas that aren’t just our own. Revolutionary socialists have a long and rich tradition of building united fronts, which seems more real now that 3 million people were in the streets.

We must do a better job at facilitating debate, discussion and argument so that we talk about how to build the kind of movement we want. But endless social media critiques with no commitment to diving into that struggle for the kind of movement we want is not a serious approach.

There are literally millions of people in this country who are now questioning everything. We need to open up our organizations, planning meetings, marches and much more to them. We need to read together, learn together, be in the streets together and stand up to this assault together.

1 comment:

Sean said...

Excellent article from this person. Excellent comment from yourself Richard. Sean.