“….before Jim Crow, before the invention of the Negro or the white man or the words and concepts that describe them, the Colonial population consisted largely of a great mass of white and black bondsmen, who occupied roughly the same economic category and were treated with equal contempt by the lords of the plantation and legislatures. Curiously unconcerned about their color, these people worked together and relaxed together. They had essentially the same interests, the same aspirations and the same grievances. They conspired together, and waged a common struggle against their common enemy-------the big planter apparatus and a social system that legalized terror against black and white bondsmen………….the available evidence, slight though it is, suggests that there were widening bonds of solidarity between the first generation of blacks and whites. And the same evidence indicates that it proved very difficult indeed to teach white people to worship their skin.” Lerone Bennet, The shaping of Black America
Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired
I want to add a few comments to the video above. It’s not
that I always forget them but I struggle to keep the videos fairly short.
I have been at events actually organized by socialists and
with speakers who claim to be socialists and have heard them proclaim that this
country, meaning the modern nation state of the US, was built on the backs of
Native Americans and people of color, or Native Americans and black people.
It leaves out the
white working class (and the Asian) and this is a serious error but it is inevitable in the world of identity politics. It was built on the backs of the white
working class also. Not only that, it makes no distinction between the classes within
the communities of color at this present stage in the country’s history.
As far as the Native Americans, they had to be swept away in
the genocidal war to occupy their lands. The US ruling class did not use the
tactic of starvation first in Vietnam pouring chemicals on their food, it was a
conscious strategy in US capitalism’s history to starve Native Americans to
death through killing their main food supply was it not? I mean the Buffalo.
They were herded in to camps and enclaves much like the Palestinians are today
with the support of US weapons and money.
No class conscious white worker would deny history or that
they have had an advantage based on skin color if it is presented to them correctly and if we discuss this in the context of building working class unity. But to lump them all together, to talk of “white supremacy” devoid of class
content is harmful to the struggle against racism sexism and ultimately
capitalism. Even the Ford Foundation is supporting conferences on White Supremacy. Most of the Italians that came here were impoverished peasants as
were the Irish and others, most Europeans, were poverty stricken. To talk of
“whites” as if they all occupy the same role in history, without a mention of
class, makes it much harder to build working class unity without which
capitalism, therefore racism, cannot be ended.
Working class Italian or Irish descendants of these people would know of the horrors and poverty of their existence handed down to them from their families. The lives in the factories, coal mines and textile mills of industrial US. In Louisiana the plantation bourgeois would import the "free" Irish labor to work on the levees which was dangerous work with a high death rate. Slaves were a commodity and too valuable. Not much skin tone solidarity there.
Working class Italian or Irish descendants of these people would know of the horrors and poverty of their existence handed down to them from their families. The lives in the factories, coal mines and textile mills of industrial US. In Louisiana the plantation bourgeois would import the "free" Irish labor to work on the levees which was dangerous work with a high death rate. Slaves were a commodity and too valuable. Not much skin tone solidarity there.
In the first English settlement, Jamestown, the ruling class
was composed of English investors and capitalists under the authority of the
King through a joint stock company formed for the purpose of expansion in to
the colonies in the early stages of capitalism’s development. The whites that
labored were different. A big problem for the ruling class was labor power, finding enough workers. As more whites and blacks were imported they formed bonds as people do. This had to be undermined and the idea of "white" as a racial definition was introduced. (Prof Jeffrey Perry has some excellent information and videos on this on his website. Check the "Developing Conjuncture" on the left of the site for information and dates of events.)
Understanding that class antagonism is the dominant feature
in society does not, or should not in any way obscure the brutal, violent and
racist history of capitalist development in the US. It does not mean we deny
that for Native people, black folk or people of color in general it is a
different history, not totally different but different as color or what we call
race here, has been the dominant divide and rule method. It would not have been
possible without the cooperation of the white workers either directly or
passively.
But British capitalism didn’t descend on the African
continent because they didn’t like the skin color of the majority of the
population. British capitalism occupied Ireland, stole all the land, starved
the people before they went in to Africa, and the Irish are white.
This does not mean I don’t understand why some people might
have the view that the white working class is a lost cause, is inherently
racist, is reactionary to the core. But there are those that take this position
to advance their own class interests, the white bourgeois at all times and
sections of the black petite bourgeois who, in competition with their white
class colleagues, appeal to the black working class to help them in that
war. This section of capitalist society
is weak in relation to their white class colleagues as they are smaller, less
powerful and lack the connections to the white racist ruling class that the
white middle class has. I do not believe the white working class is a lost
cause, and in the workplace that becomes clearer especially when there is a
strong, militant rank and file union presence there.
On coming to the US I learned that saying that when the
whites sneeze the black folks catch pneumonia or something along those lines.
It is known to anyone with a brain that when economic conditions are bad for
white folks, blacks as a group are in a state of severe depression, in some
ways, permanently.
But to ignore white workers and the changes over the 44
years I have been here is not useful. Malcolm X came to understand this in his
later years, Martin Luther King led a mass movement and came to understand
that socialism might be the only way the suffering of black folks could be
eradicated. Malcolm X was far ahead of any of them today.
We should keep one statistic in mind when considering this:
the life expectancy of whites is declining. This is a staggering statistic in
this country in the post war era; some privilege that. Imagine what is happening on the ground that
has led to this? What it means with
regard to health care, housing, education putting food on the table. Most
importantly, what it means in the consciousness of the masses.
US capitalism is in an economic, political and looming
social crisis. In times like these the possibility for class unity is greater
as workers are forced in to struggle. It’s my view that history shows that as
workers move in to struggle we tend to seek class unity, we tend to move to
overcome those imposed social barriers that are an obstacle to driving back the
capitalist offensive. But this won’t
always last if the movement, or the leadership of the movement does not take it
forward. At some point without
collective progress, the movement can disintegrate in to an “Every man or woman
for themselves” approach.
As Aristotle pointed out: “Nature hates a vacuum”. If the movement, the left, does not overcome the
poison of identity politics and excludes significant sectors of the working
class, reaction will gain traction.
“And it can be said by inverting this language, that the
laws were also passed to leave a mark on whites, who were instructed under pain
of punishment, how to act in relation to blacks. Under these laws, whites of
all classes were penalized for expressing human impulses. It therefor became
very expensive for a white person to like black people or to love them. This
was not, it should be emphasized, a matter of hints and vague threats. The laws
were quite explicit. Symptomatic of this were the laws passed to punish whites
who befriended blacks or ran away with them.” Lerone Bennet. The Shaping of
Black America
No comments:
Post a Comment