by Michael Roberts
Back last summer, there was growing concern that the world
economy, already making the weakest recovery from the deepest slump in
production and investment since 1945, was slowing down.
Indeed, it now seemed that the ugly thought of another recession, as
economists call a contraction in production, incomes and spending, was a
serious possibility within a few years or less. The IMF raised the probability of recession in the so-called ‘emerging economies’ of Latin America, ex-China Asia and the rest of the world to near 50%.
The slowdown in emerging economies has been led by the significant
slowdown in China’s powerhouse economy, from double-digit real GDP
growth just a few years ago to less than 7% now on the official figures
(many ‘experts’ reckon real GDP growth is much lower than that). As
China slowed, its inexorable demand for energy and other raw materials
and other export goods from elsewhere dropped. Other large emerging economies plummeted into recession (Brazil, Russia, South Africa).
Indeed, as I have previously pointed out,
before the crisis, world trade tended to grow around twice as quickly
as world GDP, but since 2012 trade growth has simply matched that of
“The global economy is uncomfortably close to the edge,” said David Stockton, senior fellow at the right-wing mainstream Peterson Institute for International Economics. “Economics isn’t rocket science, and even rockets frequently land in the wrong place or explode in mid-air,” wrote Willem Buiter, chief global economist at Citigroup, who has assigned a 55% chance of a moderate to severe global contraction next year.
This worry even led the US Federal Reserve to delay its planned and
much anticipated hike in its base interest rate that affects the cost of
borrowing dollars in the US and globally. If the emerging economies
were slumping, it would be the wrong time to dampen household spending
and business investment.
However, the optimists among mainstream economics have dismissed
these prognoses. Emerging economies may be slowing down and some may
have contracted outright, but the major advanced economies were doing
okay and Europe was actually picking up a little from its depression of
2010-13. So the global economic recession was not going to happen.
Well, now we are getting data for real economic growth for the third
quarter of 2015 (June to September) from the major advanced economies –
and it is not great news for the optimistic scenario. The slowdown in
economic activity experienced in China and in most emerging economies is
now being repeated in the advanced economies.
The US economy is the largest in the world and up to now has been
recovering relatively better than the other major economies within
Europe and Japan. In Q3, the US economy did expand but only at a 1.5%
annualised pace, down from 3.9% in the second quarter. That meant that
the US economy expanded in real terms over the last 12 months by just
2%, down from 2.7% in Q2.
This 2% growth rate has become the norm for the US since the end of
Great Recession. There seems no prospect of a return to previous trend
growth and that means there has been a permanent loss of value for the
American people from the Great Recession.
In Q3, US business investment slowed to its lowest yoy rate for over
two years. Business investment grew more slowly, up only at an annual
rate of 2.1% compared with 4.1% in Q2. Investment in new plant actually
dropped 4% while investment in software and such rose at the slowest
pace since 2013. And, as a share of GDP, investment remains below
Now, some have been arguing that business investment in things like
plant, machinery and equipment is less necessary given the new
‘disruptive technologies’ of the internet of things, software,
algorithms etc that do not require tangible structures. So investment
is taking place but it now costs way less and is not really captured in
For example, McKinsey argues that the “the US economy has shifted
toward intellectual property–based businesses. Medical-device,
pharmaceutical, and technology companies increased their share of
corporate profits to 32 percent in 2014, from 13 percent in 1989. Since a
company’s rate of growth and returns on capital determine how much it
needs to invest, these and other high-return enterprises can invest less
capital and still achieve the same profit growth as companies with
lower returns”. McKinsey- US – Are share buybacks jeopardizing future growth
Or put it another way: “while capital spending has outpaced GDP
growth by a small amount, investments in intellectual property— research
and development—have increased much faster. In inflation-adjusted
terms, investments in intellectual property have grown at more than
double the rate of GDP growth, 5.4 percent year versus 2.4 percent. In
2014, these investments amounted to $690 billion.” So McKinsey concludes: “Certainly,
some individual companies are probably spending too little on
growth—just as others spend too much. But in aggregate, it’s hard to
make a broad case for underinvestment”.
No doubt there is some truth in this. But even if investment is
increasingly in ‘intellectual property’ and not in factories and robots
(really?), even in the former, there appears to have been a slowdown in
the US. Software investment is no longer outstripping investment in
US household spending did rise 3.2% in the quarter. The tax intake
for personal incomes fell, so disposable personal income increased 4.8%
compared with 3.4% in Q2. And with headline inflation near zero, real
disposable personal income rose. That’s why household spending was up.
But while it’s true that the US unemployment rate continues to fall, the
pace of that improvement is waning.
The slowdown in US economic growth was also repeated in the UK, the
only other major advanced economy that has experienced 2%-plus real GDP
growth in the last year or so. Real GDP rose just 0.5% in the third
quarter of 2015, so that real GDP is now 2.3% higher than this time last
year, down from a growth rate of 2.4% yoy in Q2. Although UK real GDP
is now 6.4% higher than its peak at the beginning of 2008 (before the
Great Recession), nearly seven years ago, once the population increase
(up 3m, partly from net immigration) is taken into account, real GDP per
head has only just reached the 2008 level.
As in the US, UK growth was almost totally confined to ‘services’.
Manufacturing and construction actually contracted. Within services, the
main contribution came from property and finance, the ‘unproductive’
sectors of the economy.
Back in 2008, manufacturing was nearly 10% of GDP and real estate was
8.5%. Now manufacturing is 8.6% and real estate is 10.4%. Real estate
has jumped over 20% since 2008 while manufacturing has contracted nearly
7%. Indeed, UK
heavy industry like steel is being crushed by falling commodity prices,
weak economic growth in Europe and the dumping of Chinese steel in
world markets . That’s the nature of UK economic growth: unproductive and credit-fuelled.
As for the other G7 economies, the slowdown is even worse. Canada is in a ‘technical recession’, two consecutive quarters of contraction in real GDP.
Japan is teetering on a recession.
And just today, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) lowered its forecast for real
economic growth out to 2018. The BoJ now sees growth in the year to
April 2016 at just 1.2%, down from 1.7%. For the year to March 2017, the
BoJ now expects growth of 1.4% down from a 1.5% forecast in July. And
for the year to March 2018, the BoJ forecasts growth of only 0.3%!
The other G7 economies are in the Eurozone. Germany has sustained a
very modest growth rate in the last few years of about 1.0-1.5%; France
has growth even less each year; and Italy has been stagnant (although it
appears to be finally making a mild recovery in the couple of
quarters). We shall know more when the Q3 GDP figures come out next
week. But Germany is likely to record slower growth as exports to Asia
and China have taken a tumble.
Spain has been the fastest-growing of the Eurozone economies in the
last year or so, having suffered badly in the Great Recession with a
housing collapse and a massive increase in unemployment. But the ‘boom’
since 2013 appears to be over. Today, the figures released for Q3 2015
real GDP growth showed a slowdown to 0.8% on the quarter compared with
1% in the previous quarter. The year on year rate was up to 3.4% though
compared to 3.1% in Q2. But that could be it.
So expansion in the major advanced economies is slowing alongside the
sharp drop in GDP growth in the emerging economies. Indeed, Taiwan, a
key Asian industrial economy, has just announced that its real GDP in Q3
fell by 1% from a year earlier, the first contraction in six years.
Since World War II, recessions have occurred at regular intervals,
between 6-10 years. The current expansion is more than six years old,
beginning in July 2009. Mainstream economics has signally failed to
predict them. For example, in the spring of 2001, the US economy faced
weak growth abroad and the fallout of the dot-com bubble, but only 15%
of economists surveyed that summer believed a downturn had begun. Yet
the economy was in the midst of a recession that lasted nine months. As
for the Great Recession, the failure of nearly all mainstream
economists and major international institutions like the IMF and the
OECD to see this major slump coming is well recorded. (The causes of the Great Recession).
The next recession will pose big problems for the economic policy
makers of the major countries. Easy monetary policy (zero interest
rates, quantitative easing) has been virtually exhausted (apart from
being pretty ineffective anyway in boosting the ‘real economy’ rather
than stock markets and banks). Keynesian-style government spending has
been rejected or curbed up to now because public sector debt levels have been so high and corporate profitability has been so low.
There are those like Ben Bernanke, former Fed chief
or Andy Haldane, current chief economist at the Bank of England, who
argue that central banks saved the major economies from a Great
Depression and there is even more that can be done in printing money for direct handouts to households or having negative interest rates to avoid a new slump.
And the Keynesians like Paul Krugman, Larry Summers, Simon Wren-Lewis and a host of others continue to push for more government spending and budget deficits to ‘pump-prime’ the economy. But this is more likely to reduce profitability and investment of the capitalist sector than save it.
The next recession cannot be avoided and it is not far away.
- AFSCME Local 444 negotiations assesment 1997
- Preparing for Revolution: A discussion document
- The Internal lives of Revolutionary Organizations
- Socialist Alternative members: Questions and Answers
- Sanders: Our Alternative
- University of California workers and Unions
- An Invitation to Our Readers
- Facts For Working People Weekly Phone Conferences and Discussions
- Help open The AFL-CIO AIFLD Archives