by Michael Roberts
So Justin, the son of the former Liberal PM of the 1970s, Pierre
Trudeau, has triumphed in Canada’s general election. The Liberal party
came from behind to sweep into an outright majority victory, removing
the incumbent Conservative government that had been in office for nearly
ten years under Stephen Harper.
The third party, the New Democrats, similar to the British Labour
party, which had been ahead in the polls at the start of the long 79-day
election campaign, eventually fell back to a poor third. The reason,
it seems, is that the Liberals decided to adopt an anti-austerity
programme, advocating budget deficits (not large though), improved
minimum wages and an infrastructure investment plan, in opposition to
the neo-liberal polices of the Conservatives. The Liberals stole the
NDP policies and romped to victory.
Justin Trudeau though faces a difficult task economically. Canadian
capitalism has been a relative success story, based on its close
proximity to US imperialism and its capital investment and its resources
of oil, gas and other minerals. But that ‘luck’ also delivers big
vulnerabilities: the economy is subject to the swings of boom and slump
in the US and to changes in the world prices for oil and resources.
And world energy prices have plummeted in the last 18 months. As a
result, the Canadian dollar has plummeted from parity with the US dollar
to some 30% weaker. And the economy has slipped into a ‘technical
recession’, where real GDP has contracted for two successive quarters.
Behind that lies a collapse in business investment, mainly in the
energy sectors. In June, there was a 4.6% fall. As the IMF put it “Business
nonresidential investment has slowed in recent years (following a
strong rebound initially after the crisis). The slowdown has been
widespread— including both the energy sector and broader spending on
machinery and equipment”. cr1522
And as the Royal Bank of Canada puts it: “Business fixed
investment fell at double-digit rates in both the first and second
quarters of 2015 weighed down by massive cuts by energy companies. The
persistence of low oil prices (WTI hit a cycle low in late August) will
likely yield another hit to investment in the third and potentially
fourth quarters. Despite large cuts introduced earlier in the year, the
recent downdraft in energy prices and our revised assumption that the
rebound in 2016 will be more muted than we previously thought, suggests
that investment by the energy sector will continue to decline in 2016.” fcst_sep2015
The only thing keeping the economy going is credit-fuelled, low
interest borrowing, boosting consumption and a housing bubble. The Bank
of Canada has commented that the housing bubble will “increase the likelihood and potential severity of a correction later on”.
Canada’s household debt-to-disposable income ratio stood at a record
164.6 in the second quarter of 2015, compared with 163.0 in the first
quarter, according to the national statistics agency. It has risen from
142.52 per cent in the first quarter of 2008, the year of the financial
The Royal Bank of Canada’s affordability index for housing has
reached 60% in Toronto, the highest it has been since the early 1990s.
Vancouver is ranked at more than 80%, the highest since 1982 when it
exceeded 90%. If interest rates start rising, this will drive up debt
servicing for many.
Interest rates and business investment are low not just because of
the collapse in energy prices. Canadian business profitability has been
weak and falling. Productivity growth has been poor.
As the IMF put it in a recent report: “Perceived low investment
profitability has negatively affected the neutral rate. After a quick
turnaround at the end of the recession, labor productivity and,
especially, the investment specific shock (which drives investment
profitability) have been underperforming until recently, reducing the
demand for funds and, thus, preventing the natural rate from rising. In
particular, news shocks to investment profitability turned particularly
overly pessimistic by the end of 2011 even though labor productivity has
been slowly improving.” cr1523
Indeed, the trajectory for profitability for Canadian capital over
the long term has been similar to that of the US: the profitability
crisis of the 1970s, followed by a neo-liberal recovery and then a
downward shift before the Great Recession.
The recovery since the end of the Great Recession in mid-2009 looked
promising as commodity prices, particularly energy, jumped. But, like
Brazil, with the collapse in the ‘commodity cycle’, Canada’s recovery
petered out and began to reverse. Now the new Liberal government is
faced with weak or non-existent economic growth, businesses unable or
unwilling to invest, and a risky housing bubble. Meanwhile, the global
economy continues to slow.
- AFSCME Local 444 negotiations assesment 1997
- Preparing for Revolution: A discussion document
- The Internal lives of Revolutionary Organizations
- Socialist Alternative members: Questions and Answers
- Sanders: Our Alternative
- University of California workers and Unions
- An Invitation to Our Readers
- Facts For Working People Weekly Phone Conferences and Discussions
- Help open The AFL-CIO AIFLD Archives