Richard Mellor
Leaon Trotsky the Russian Revolutionary, leader of the Red Army and important figure in the Russian Revolution speaks here on Stalinism and Stalin's purges and executions that occurred in the show trials in the mid 1930's. He was in exile in Mexico and eventually one of Stalin's assassins murdered him there in 1940.
From 1998 Order Here
Regardless of one's political views, he has to be admired for his principles and convictions never wavering in his commitment to socialism and the international working class. It is my personal view that the rise of Stalinism and the extermination of almost the entire leadership of the Bolshevik Party did irreparable harm to socialism internationally and socialist ideas among the working class. The power of the Russian Communist Party, it's credibility at the time considered the force that had led the first successful socialist revolution, and the global influence it had, played a huge role in the degeneration of the communist parties everywhere.
Like most workers growing up in the advanced capitalist countries, I was never drawn to Stalinism, which I believed, as we all did, was communism. It was for the right reasons, lack of democracy, all empowering bureaucratic state apparatus not to mention western propaganda. When someone introduced me to the trilogy about Trotsky's life by Isaac Deutscher it sparked my interest. I had already become interested in Russia and its history reading Dostoyevsky, Turgenev, Gogol, and a school friend got me reading Solzhenitsyn's books, The First Circle, The Cancer Ward and One Day in The Life of Ivan Denisovitch. Then I read Trotsky's History of the Russian Revolution and his autobiography, My Life followed by many more works of his, and this sparked my interest in socialism or communism. I would never have read the Communist Manifest were it not that Trotsky stood in opposition to Stalinism and explained why it arose.
I
do not call myself a Trotskyist, I think this sort of thing is a little cullish for many people, and Trotsky was not without weaknesses
and flaws, we all have them to one degree or another. But I am grateful
that he defended Marxism and the idea that humans beings can build a
society free of exploitation and poverty, that we don't have to wait for
heaven to be free. I was once told that Marxist ideas were simply a way
of looking at and understanding the world and that in this way, we can
collectively change it, consciously build an alternative to the madness
of the market. Marx was not afraid to change his views when objective
reality demanded it.
When I visited his house in Mexico City, I was a bit disappointed that there were periodicals from various international groups that claim the mantle of Trotskyism yet are incapable of connecting with working class people in any serious way, are in fact isolated form the workers and the working class movement in the main. Myself and others found them or practically no importance, in fact, a hindrance in the struggle for workers rights in the workplace. Like Marx who disassociated himself from the many groupings and factions that called themselves Marxist, I am sure Trotsky would do the same today and like Trotsky, Marx would have found himself in Siberia or in front of the firing squad in Stalinist Russia.
Trotsky bears his share of responsibility for any mistakes he might have made, and I am certainly not in the same place politically that I was 30 years ago. But he was on the right side of history until is death as far as working people are concerned.
1 comment:
Thanks, Richard. I do not know about Trotsky, just a small bit. Maybe you could relate what T's views were, the article doesn't get into that. Against a totalitarian state -- is there more. I wrote a comment just a minute ago, you might be interested, but it's not related to this article. About inequality, I think it was published at Popular Resistance which I read regularly, about the more accurate poverty level in U.S. -- my comment:
benleet • a minute ago
25.7% of U.S. population live with incomes below 150% of the OPM, poverty. That's the number from the latest, 2020, Sup. Poverty Measure, SPM. That's 85 million. That's about poverty. An author of the SPM, Kathleen Short, wrote in 2013 that 140% of the OPM poverty level meant that people were "unable to achieve a safe and decent standard of living." That's from a 30 year veteran of the U.S. Census who wrote the SPM.
Meaning, nearly 25% live in poverty, according to the author of the SPM.
Let me mention savings, also.
The average household savings is $926,000, believe it or not. But the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in 2017 released a report saying that 24% owned less than $250 in "liquid assets", and 54% lived with less than $5,000 in "liquid assets." The report is "Household Financial Well-Being" in 2017, page 80. See for yourself.
These articles are good, and we must continue to pour this information into the public's ears. The Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Table 2.1, Personal Income says that the "disposable income" (meaning after paying federal taxes income) per capita (meaning, per human) was over $55,000 in 2020. You can look it up. A family of four therefore, on average, has an income (average income) of $220,000. And the OPM level is below $26,000. Imagine! My blog is Economics Without Greed, Part Two. Check it out.
Post a Comment