Richard
Mellor
Afscme
Local 444, retired
It
is almost a surreal scene, an overcast sky, the constant smell of smoke in the
air and people walking down the street even driving in their cars wearing masks
to alleviate some of the unpleasant affects of breathing in smoke filled air.
That’s
life in in the San Francisco Bay Area.
I
went down to Monterey CA yesterday just to get out for an overnight trip with a
friend and the air down there was much nicer, less toxic. I returned today and
the difference in air quality was significant.
The
cause of this crisis is the worst fire in California history, what we call the
Camp Fire in Butte County about 200 miles NE of where I live. At this writing,
the fire has burned about 135,000 acres destroyed 9000 structures and destroyed the town of Paradise California, a population of about
30,000. So far it is responsible for 56 deaths with 130 or so people still
missing. Fires are also raging in the south of the state and the celebrity
community of Malibu has also been evacuated. I saw video of the Santa Monica mountains
today that resembled Hiroshima. There
are no birds, no insects, no sounds, nothing, one person said.
The
Butte County Camp Fire area is about 25% contained according to media reports and the
area of the fires’ origin is closed off and is being investigated as a crime
scene.The fire was traveling so fast fire fighters were unable to fight it and
ended up primarily as a rescue operation according to reports. The cause of the
fire is still under investigation. It is still undecided as to whether it was caused by human activity like a campfire
or some other means. A lawsuit has been filed by some of the victims against Pacific Gas
and Electric, (PG&E) the state’s power utility. PG&E is an old
established private, investor owned energy supplier for much of central and
northern California on up to the Oregon border and is regulated by the
California Public Utilities Commission. Since the fires its stock price has tumbled.
PG&E
has been sued and found responsible for fires in the past and although no
determination has been reached, there is a lot of information coming to light
that points in the direction of PG&E.
The attorney for the plaintiffs in the recent suit said that
there were complaints of problems with power lines before the fire started and
there are witnesses
to substantiate this according to the media.
Initially,
the Predator in Chief Trump blamed the fire and the spate of fires the state
has endured, on the Forestry Service and bad management, “There is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly
forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor,”
he announced as the fire raged. Trump then threatened to withhold federal
funds if there is no immediate “remedy”
to this poor management.
The
Wall Street Journal, perhaps the most important mouthpiece of US finance
capital, while critical of Trump’s “rhetorical
style” in an editorial earlier this week (“Mr. Trump
has no empathy gene”) agrees with him. Extremely high winds and low
moisture makes fired harder to contain the Journal says but “fueling” the fires is an “overgrown government bureaucracy” .
Of
course the WSJ blames government bureaucracy because then Trump’s remedy with
which they agree, can provide the alternative they both desire, the management
of California’s vast lands should be in private hands, it should be, like all
things in the capitalist mode of production, an opportunity for profit making.
And it is not just the management of these lands that should be a profit making
venture. Some 57% of California forestland is owned by the federal government,
in other words, it is a public venture like the USPS, (post office) another highly efficient
public service. Education, the US mail, land management and land itself are all
opportunities missed as far as the investor, the owner of capital, is
concerned. Pubic expenditure crowds out private capital and reduces
opportunities for profits and capital accumulation. Successful public projects
also tend to undermine the argument that only the private sector can provide
jobs, can manage society, can provide the needs of society; it is a bad
precedent. This type of expenditure is only good when it facilitates market
activity like the building of the freeway system or rail that transport
manufactured goods. Capitalism has to have an infrastructure that supports its
economic activity and is reluctant to rely on the market.
So
the Wall Street Journal points to the real culprit in all of this, regulation
and other curbs on market activity and profit making. That’s why they hate
unions, they are an obstacle of sorts to the free flow of capital, the
capitalist’s right to do what they want with their capital and when. This is what Trump wants but is incapable of
articulating.
The
Journal blames the “numerous” laws
passed over the last 50 years that curb the capitalist’s freedom. Laws like the
Endangered
Species Act and National
Environmental Policy Act. For the
Wall Street Journal and the US capitalist class it is these policies and the
regulations and permits and other, what they call “bureaucratic” measures that are the root cause of these catastrophic
fires that have ravaged and continue to ravage our state.
The
glaring omission in the Wall Street Journal editorial is climate change. There
is not one word about that. These laws
and what are actually fairly toothless regulations (OSHA is close to worthless
in protecting workers on the job but the US Chamber of Commerce still opposed
it), are to blame. The journal refers to them as “political blinders” but they are restrictions, small ones, on the
rights of capital.
Paradise
has had just 0.88
inches of rain since May 1, compared with a historical average of over 7
So no
matter what way one looks at it, the root cause of these catastrophic events is
capitalism, how society is organized. How we produce the necessities of
life. On the one hand there is climate
change and all the by products of this that we should be familiar with by
now. Where humans live. How cities and
our communities are built and where they are built is is all determined by
planners and experts acting on behalf of owners of capital, investors and their
political parties and representatives. The more people want to escape urban
life and go live in the forest the more likelihood of fire and one of the
riskiest additions to this living is the need for a power supply. Gas and
electricity has to be brought to these communities.
Pacific
gas and Electric is a for profit corporation and in all such activity, profit
is paramount. Some utilities shut off power in extreme weather conditions in
order to lessen the chance of fires but PG&E never did this until recently.
The attorney for Camp Fire victims, “….claims
PG&E sent out emails indicating it would shut off power before the Camp
Fire but didn't do it. "Their meteorologists were watching the conditions,
and then they decided not to," he said. "They decided to leave the
power on." CNBC.com
The
attorney told CNBC that , "PG&E
does not want to shut off power for the reason that management bonuses are tied
not to safety, but rather the lack of customer complaints," When
people are told their power is about to be shut off they complain which makes
management hesitant to do so. Profit comes first.
There
is no doubt that bureaucracy in the public sector comes with problems, mostly due to it functioning within the capitalist system as opposed to under the democratic ownership and control of workers as workers and as consumers.. But a society’s energy needs
should not be in private hands. Like health care, education, transportation and
other important social needs, the profit motive is a huge barrier to providing
them.
Like
the catastrophic hurricanes we are experiencing, these fires are not “acts of god” or a problem of regulation
or environmental legislation aimed at protecting plant or animal life including
our own, they are products of an inefficient, wasteful and bankrupt system of
social organization. I am not a climate
scientist but I am aware that through time, the planet has gone through climate
patterns, some extreme, some gradual. Bur what we are witnessing is different.
The changes that are threatening to end life as we know it on this planet are
occurring as a direct result of human intervention. They are a by product of
human activity, not in general, but specifically as part of a system of
production that is incompatible with human life and all life that has arisen
and existed up till now.
This
is one lesson we must draw from these crises and the other is that we cannot
sit idly by if we love our children and our grandchildren. We owe it to them,
we are obligated to them, to act to change the system and to build a new world in which we can live in harmony with each other and the
natural world that gave us life.
No comments:
Post a Comment