I was concerned that we do not have a piece up here dealing with the banning at French beaches of the Burkini, a full body bathing suit for Muslim women that leaves only the face and hands bare. Five towns have banned them and three more are about to do so the media reports. This is occurring despite, "some of the mayors considering the bans admit to never having seen one.", the New York Times reports.
I believe workers and socialists like myself must oppose this ban. No state or religion or has the right to tell a woman/person what they must wear. In our society the corporate media is relentless in its pressure on women and young girls telling them how they should look what they should wear if they want to be successful or get the right partner or job. We all face this ideological onslaught. Do western women wear their bikini's by choice or through media pressure? I saw some 10 year old the other day dressed like an adult woman, with makeup and all. What's free about that? I was in France before and saw monks and nuns walking around in ancient garb as well as ultra-orthadox Jews. How secular is that? This is clearly an assault on Muslim women.
I republish below a piece by Wendy that she put on this blog some time ago and it's still as relevant now as it was then. RM
by Wendy Forrest
Lawmakers in France are very close to imposing a legal ban on the veil worn by only a few thousand Muslim women in the country.
A parliamentary panel anticipates that by the end of 2010 their
recommendations will become law. What are some of these recommendations?
“Mass transport, hospitals, post offices …and all public services
will be off- limits to all Muslim women wearing face-covering veils if a
parliamentary panel’s recommendations become law.” (Toronto Globe and Mail January 2010.)
It gets worse! She will probably be denied state aid such as
unemployment insurance, social welfare benefits and be prohibited from
entering a university classroom. Another recommendation is to deny “resident cards and citizenship to women who wear all-encompassing veils.”
This just about covers it-no health care, no education, no social
benefits, no mobility, no immigrant and citizenship rights-no legal
If these recommendations become law the result is nothing other than an
assault on the bodies, minds and emotions of these Muslim women trapped
within the claws of two patriarchal prohibitions, religious and
‘secular.” I am not an apologist for the oppression of women living
within and impacted severely on a moment by moment basis by any
patriarchal institution, religion, custom or practice, the extreme
opposite is the case-I am outraged and disgusted. Nor do I subscribe to
the mantra of cultural relativism as a way of analyzing or understanding
social relations, practices or institutions. But there is a huge and
essential difference between how we understand “difference”
regarding cultural and religious institutional practices and how we
regulate cultural and religious norms and practices-how we treat them in
If a Muslim woman wears the veil as an act of ‘faith,” and does
not, like me, view all institutionalized forms of religion as
patriarchal and oppressive to women, neither I nor any state has the
right to force her to take that intellectual journey-let alone act
against her faith. Too often we witness economic , religious, political
and social agendas played out on the bodies and lives of women in
unique ways and it is all the more destructive and dirty when concealed
behind the lofty, and in this case, abstract premises of support for “enlightened secularism” and state “security.”
What a mockery of the ideas of “choice” for these women and, I
will add, choice generally for all women and peoples enslaved under the
ideological constructs of institutionalized religion, racism, sexism ,
What do France’s lawmakers propose these women do? I believe that
wearing the veil represents a deep prohibition and regulation of choice
inscribed upon women’s bodies, upon their choice regarding what parts of
their bodies they can expose publicly. I also believe that the wearing
of burka and niqab can severely restrict women’s economic and
occupational choices. Operating a backhoe, working in an auto factory or
being a firefighter for instance is extremely unsafe and virtually
impossible if veiled and encumbered by certain clothing proscribed by
religion or culture. I also know that there are many similar
prohibitions in secular societies that have a similar effect on women’s
choices----prohibitions that affect women’s bodies, size, shape,
mobility, sexual, social and economic “choices.” The question has
never been and will never be whether or not individual women have
choices regarding these restrictions and prohibitions that exclude,
marginalize and even cripple them. Anyone who thinks this way is mad.
The penalties for women who dare to defy all forms of oppression unique
to gender are harsh and always have been.
“Witches" were drowned and burnt because they dared challenge
patriarchal laws and practices, because they dared provide women with
control over their reproductive choices. Millions of women throughout
the ages to this day have been and still are denied reproductive
choices, including the right to abortions, and because of this they die
or live lives of shame and poverty. The Catholic and Protestant
religion historically have enslaved women in their homes, denied them
economic freedoms, by restricting and denying women reproductive choices
for centuries. In “secular” capitalist societies, eating
disorders maim and kill girls and women who desperately starve their
bodies in order to conform to fashion and be “desired” by men.
Young women-----just babies really------are forced into the sex trade in
countries like Thailand and the Philippines to be mauled and treated
like pieces of meat by men from the “enlightened secular capitalist”
countries---the little money they make is sent back to their hungry
poor families in the countryside, families literally destroyed by
neo-liberal economic policies. The sexual slave trade and literal
imprisonment of women is illegal yet still rampant and tolerated in
Europe, Canada and the US. Neo-liberal economic policies force thousands
of women in Chile for instance to work in the cut flower factories
where they suffer miscarriages and their children are born deformed
because of the use of potent pesticides designed to deteriorate as the
flowers move north. The rape of women in war is a common, tolerated,
sometimes promoted practice in many countries throughout history and to
It is insulting to speak about individual “choice” for women in these situations.
What is a Muslim woman in France whose religion and culture requires her
to wear a veil to do if these recommendations become law? What are her
choices in fact when she is caught between at least two institutional
mandates---between the laws of her nation and the laws of tradition,
culture and religion----all of them patriarchal? What penalties will be
imposed on her if she refuses to remove or lift her veil? Will she
actually be denied the right to citizenship, to use public transit,
access social services, education and health care –in fact will she even
be a legitimate person if she refuses to remove or lift the veil? And
if she does conform to these “secular” laws, remove or lift her
veil in order to survive, care for her children, receive health care and
move about the towns and cities to buy food and go about the daily
necessary business of life –what happens if she is forced to break the
custom, traditions and laws of her religion and her culture? No one
should be forced to make that choice. The argument around security and
identification of women is completely bogus. Most Muslim women who wear
the veil subscribe to identification protocol and there should be
provision for these women to lift their veils for identification in an
environment that is safe, in front of women officials only for instance.
Women passing through customs are not “patted down” by male customs officers but by female officers. The same rights should be granted women wearing niqab or burka.
Will she be marginalized from her family, friends and community? Will
she be excluded and subjected to know what kinds of harsh penalties in
her day to day existence? How will her children fare? What sort of
choices are these? No choice at all really.
This is madness and a conscious refusal to consider the complexities of
women's lives; women whose choices are constrained by the practices and
mandates of patriarchal religious and secular institutions-a classic
dilemma with cruel implications and repercussion no matter her choice.
This is just one more example of politics being played out on the bodies and lives of women.
Are these laws even implementable? Will women who refuse to remove
their veils be sent to jail? Will hospitals turn them away; will they be
denied money for food and other necessities of life? Will transit
drivers kick them off the subways and buses?
Women of all religions and cultures can and are forced to conform to
patriarchal norms and restrictions. But we cannot and will not be “forced” to be ‘free “
of these restrictions and choices under conditions where we are not
safe and comfortable to do so and where we as working women have not
been permitted to make the laws and rules that govern our bodies and our
lives. If the penalties for being “liberated” are as great or
greater than the cost of being oppressed, if the social, psychological
and sometimes even physical choices carry the risk of equal or worse
abuse and oppression then this is a mockery of choice.
Defending the right of women to make choices regarding their bodies, their clothing and their “faith” does
not undermine secularism. Forcing women or any group to renounce the
customs and traditions of their faith or religion and penalizing them in
law, denying them the rights of full citizenship, goes way beyond mere
insensitivity to the complexities of women’s lives. Unfortunately none
of this is about bettering these women’ lives.
The government of France is using Muslim women to deflect from deeper
economic and political issues such as the economic crisis, deep cuts to
the spending in the public sector, attacks on workers jobs, benefits and
working conditions. They are using Muslim women to inflame more
distrust and hatred of Muslim working people and immigrants at a time
when they are being to rise up and protest the poverty and racism they
are forced to endure.
All working people in France, trade unions and women’s organizations
must fight against this and all forms of blatant racism and sexism.
How can we even begin to speak of choice here?
- AFSCME Local 444 negotiations assesment 1997
- Preparing for Revolution: A discussion document
- The Internal lives of Revolutionary Organizations
- Socialist Alternative members: Questions and Answers
- Sanders: Our Alternative
- University of California workers and Unions
- An Invitation to Our Readers
- Facts For Working People Weekly Phone Conferences and Discussions
- Help open The AFL-CIO AIFLD Archives