Here is an excellent analysis of the present situation with regard to developments in the British Labor Party. from Roger Silverman. I am not sure that I agree that two classes cannot, for a period, share the same party although Roger does write, "sooner or later,
the working class must either reclaim the Labour Party or replace it" which seems to say as much. In another forum Roger also clarified that Britain is perhaps the most unstable country in Western Europe not Europe as a whole. I Overall, Silverman makes as he so often does, some excellent points about the situation in Britain at the moment. RM
by Roger Silverman
After decades of political stagnation, Britain is suddenly plunged
into turmoil. It has become, for the moment, the most unstable country
in Europe. Within a few weeks, it has witnessed the murder of a Labour
MP by a Nazi assassin, the shock outcome of the EU referendum, an
upsurge of xenophobia and bigotry, the unexpected resignation of a prime
minister and the successive downfall of his two most prominent presumed
successors… And, most crucial of all, the long-overdue split in the
Labour Party.
At first sight Corbyn may appear a little less
radical than Bernie Sanders in the USA, with his talk of "revolution"
against the "billionaires' dictatorship". But Corbyn, an honest and
principled traditional left reformist, stands implacably for resistance
to austerity, nuclear disarmament, and renationalisation of the
railways, and these are solid commitments. The difference is in the
historical context. The election of Corbyn means a reclamation by the
working class of the party it created over a hundred years ago from the
clutches of conscious agents of the class enemy. It was the result of an
unforerseen tidal wave: an anticipation of revolution. The violent
class tensions that had been tightly compressed for two decades within
the Labour Party, the traditional party of the working class created by
the trade unions, could no longer be reconciled. Under the shock of the
financial crash and the subsequent years of savage cuts, nothing could
prevent it bursting asunder.
These Labour MPs are not just a new
generation of the old-style reformists of yesteryear – tainted
individuals perhaps, cowardly, treacherous, bribed or intimidated, but
with roots firmly implanted in the labour movement. During the 1990s, an
openly pro-capitalist grouping assumed the leadership of the Labour
Party. One of them, Mandelson, openly boasted: “I am supremely relaxed
about people getting filthy rich, so long as they pay their taxes”. They
tried to eradicate Labour’s socialist and trade-union traditions and
proclaimed a new identity, calling themselves “New Labour”.
New
Labour served a very specific historical purpose. It was the product of a
conscious conspiracy by the ruling class: to carry onward the
Thatcherite counter-revolution wrapped in new packaging, once the Tories
had become too discredited to do it themselves under their own banner.
It was only after the financial crisis in 2008 that New Labour was
deemed to have outlived its usefulness; once having served its purpose
in government, it was unceremoniously ditched, and the reins of power
firmly grasped by Britain’s traditional masters.
The Blairite MPs
have no links or allegiance to the labour movement, let alone any
aspirations to a new society. They are plain careerists who at a certain
time found it opportune to jump on the New Labour bandwagon. Most of
them are relics of that Blairite influx: an alien force of lawyers,
lobbyists and "special advisers" hostile to the workers’ interests. One
trade union leader rightly called them a "virus".
Two classes
can’t share one party. It was always inevitable that, sooner or later,
the working class must either reclaim the Labour Party or replace it.
With the mobilisation of the Labour ranks and affiliated trade unions,
and a huge influx of new and overwhelmingly younger members, we see a
combination of both variants: a replenished and reinvigorated mass
workers' party, already numbering half a million members.
The
exact mechanism by which the crisis has erupted is a consequence of the
arrogance of the Blairites, who still delude themselves that they enjoy
mass support. They had blamed the election of their previous leader, the
pathetically ineffectual Ed Miliband, on the trade union block vote,
and imagined that by throwing open the franchise to all and sundry,
allowing anyone to register as a supporter, they could secure victory
for their own preferred candidate. They then compounded this mistake by
lending Jeremy Corbyn enough MPs' nominations to cross the threshold to
stand as a candidate, hoping thereby to demonstratively humiliate the
left.
Actually it was a questionable exercise of "democracy" to
allow the party leadership to be determined by selling cheap votes to
all and sundry, irrespective of their commitment to the party. However,
such was popular outrage at New Labour's despicable record of treachery,
and anger at the election by default last year of yet another even more
right-wing Tory government, that hundreds of thousands of people
registered as supporters, exercised their voting rights as affiliated
trade unionists, or joined the Party outright. Jeremy Corbyn won a
decisive majority in all three sectors, with 60% of the vote and a
popular mandate of 250,000 people.
If Corbyn's victory was not to
mean a reclamation by the working class of its traditional party, then
it would have been meaningless. What had to follow was a clean break
between the mass of trade-union rank-and-file Labour activists and the
parasitic rump of New Labour MPs clinging on to their parliamentary
seats.
Under the impact of current historical shocks, what was
already a simmering crisis has now come to an immediate showdown.
Predictably, it was the MPs who precipitated it. By a four-to-one
majority, they passed a vote of no confidence in Corbyn's leadership and
are now scrambling around trying to find a candidate to challenge him.
Having failed in a brazen plot to keep Corbyn off the ballot paper (a
provocation that could only have precipitated an immediate split), in an
act of pure spite they disenfranchised over 100,000 Labour members at a
stroke by imposing an arbitrary cut-off membership date, and raised the
affiliation fee for new supporters from £3 to £25, while giving them a
deadline of just two days to register.
It's not, as they pretend,
the risk of defeat in a coming general election that the Blairite MPs
are afraid of; what terrifies them is the prospect of victory under a
socialist leadership. Jeremy Corbyn was elected leader of the Labour
Party with the biggest mandate of any political leader in British
history.
Hundreds of thousands of people were inspired to join the
Labour Party to support him. Since his election, Labour has begun to
recover from years of decline under Blair, Brown and Milliband.
Who are the Labour right to complain of declining support? It is eleven
years since they last won an election. Since the 1997 election, under
Blair and Brown, Labour lost four million votes; not to mention losing
every single seat but one in Scotland to the Scottish Nationalists. In
contrast, under Corbyn's leadership, Labour gained the biggest share of
the vote in local council elections around the country; won all four
successive by-elections with increased shares of the vote; and won all
four mayoral elections, including London, where the Labour candidate won
the highest ever vote for any individual candidate: 1.1 million votes.
The imminent split in the Labour Party is long overdue. The mass of
trade-union rank-and-file Labour activists and the parasitic cabal of
crypto-Tory MPs who have made their nests in the parliamentary party
could not preserve for long their uneasy cohabitation. For them, this is
not a political debate. They are fighting for their careers, their
livelihoods, their privileged place in society. This is a fight to the
finish.
Hundreds of thousands of Labour activists are ready and
waiting to defeat this coup by a clique of embittered careerists, and
restore to Labour its socialist traditions. Everywhere throughout
Britain, every day, local branches of Momentum, the grassroots mass
movement that has sprung up in support of Corbyn, are meeting, planning,
recruiting, discussing, campaigning, enraged at the MPs' dirty tricks
and determined at all costs to win: working-class women, ethnic
minorities, youth, disabled people, older men… a real parliament of the
people!
Battle is joined!
If you have opinions about the subject matter of posts on this blog please share them. Do you have a story about how the system affects you at work school or home, or just in general? This is a place to share it.
Tuesday, July 19, 2016
Britain: Corbyn and the war against the Blairites
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment