I said that I was not going to do another post on Thomas Piketty and his book Capital in the 21st century (see my previous posts). But I could not resist this.
There has been a bit of a campaign against criticisms of Piketty’s
book by some leftists, who argue that Marxist critics in particular have
not read Piketty’s book and they should be less critical and more
positive. Well, I have read it, but it seems that Piketty has not read
Marx, although he slams Marx’s explanation of capitalism at various
points throughout his book.
Here is an interview with Piketty in New Republic magazine.
IC: Can you talk a little bit about the effect of Marx on your thinking and how you came to start reading him?
TP: I never managed really to read it. I mean I don’t know if you’ve tried to read it. Have you tried?
IC: Some of his essays, but not the economics work.
TP: The Communist Manifesto of 1848 is a short and strong piece. Das
Kapital, I think, is very difficult to read and for me it was not very
IC: Because your book, obviously with the title, it seemed like you were tipping your hat to him in some ways.
TP: No not at all, not at all! The big difference is that my book is
a book about the history of capital. In the books of Marx there’s no
Interview in New Republic magazine
- AFSCME Local 444 negotiations assesment 1997
- Preparing for Revolution: A discussion document
- The Internal lives of Revolutionary Organizations
- Socialist Alternative members: Questions and Answers
- Sanders: Our Alternative
- The Nature of the New European Left
- University of California workers and Unions
- An Invitation to Our Readers
- Facts For Working People Weekly Phone Conferences and Discussions
- Help open The AFL-CIO AIFLD Archives