Read more |
by Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired
Marx pointed out that a capitalist is a capitalist by virtue
of the fact that unlike a miser, who aims at increased riches by saving his
money, by keeping it out of circulation, a “capitalist
gone mad”; the rational capitalist knows that to get rich he has to
constantly throw his money in to circulation despite the risk that it might not
come back pregnant with profits. The end result, branch of industry or object
of this transaction, is incidental, “The
restless never-ending process of profit-making alone is what he aims at.”, says
Marx *
The more the risk of losses can be averted, all the better.
If it can be avoided altogether, why, that’s pure heaven. And one way risk can
be avoided is to ensure that if the transaction is not profitable, the profit is
guaranteed by public funds, the taxpayer picks up the tab.
This is as clear as day in the sports business as I
pointed out in a previous commentary. Owning an American Football franchise is the dream of most
of these coupon clippers and for practically all of the stadiums throughout the
US, it is the taxpayers that foot the bill, 71% of the costs on average
according to Bloomberg BusinessWeek
What
a deal that is. The private sector
boasts of the efficiency of the market, but “efficiency”
to them is all about profits, not services, the human needs that are met, or
how socially useful something is.
Over
the past 20 years or so we have seen increased privatization of public
services. Not simply buses and light
rail, we have seen an increased private sector investment in construction and
maintenance of highways, bridges, parking facilities and related services. I
drove on private freeways in Indiana and Illinois.
The problem is that these investments are not producing enough profits for investors; they need more incentive if they are to part with cash; after all they’re not communists, to quote a famous line from the Godfather. They don’t invest in roads simply so people can drive on them.
Initially, the general idea was that charging people tolls
to use highways would cover the investment and produce a nice return but since
1995, things have soured for those who like to make money without working. Some
eleven highway projects have been struggling to produce enough profits for the
investors, according to Bloomberg
BW , so the private companies involved are, ”persuading states to make fixed payments” BW writes. No fixed
payments, no capital, they’ll put their money somewhere else, after all, that’s
what freedom means in a capitalist society isn’t it.
Florida has agreed to pay investors $66 million a year to
renovate one of that state’s highways and add some toll lanes. If the private
group can get this done by June of next year, the investors could receive
another $686 million. Anyone whose
worked construction knows what that means, cutting corners on safety, keeping
costs down and unions out or cooperative.
In order to attract this private capital Illiniois, Indiana
as well as the Port Authority of New Your and New Jersey are offering investors
fixed payments that can guarantee returns.
“We are seeing more of that
because investors are a bit more skittish about the US market.” Says one
academic involved in Cornell University’s infrastructure program.
This is a much better deal for investors and more and more private infrastructure projects will be through up front fixed payments. Six toll-road projects being discussed are will be financed this way. As Business Week puts it, “…it’s taxpayers who roll the dice.”
What an inefficient way to build social
infrastructure------to provide mass transit.
First of all, investment should be in other forms of mass transit other
than the auto. But leaving that aside
for the moment, it’s the taxpayers handing over more money to the 1%. The above
projects under discussion not only guarantee investors profits, cash has to be
handed over to Price WaterhousCoopers, a firm that provides consulting services
to companies building the highways. “For
the financial community, it makes it much less risky and less costly” says a
PriceWaterhouse spokesperson.
Meanwhile the bankruptcies continue to grow as investors
abandon what they though might be a quick safe buck. We are not privy to the actual details and
dealings of these corporations but we can be pretty sure bankruptcy favors
their position.
Throughout US history, moneyed interests have plundered the
wealth of the country, first the land of course and then its use. The railroad companies getting free land 20
miles either side of the tracks across a continent made a few people rich we
know that. It wasn’t hard work; you
can’t get rich through hard work.
What we have here is a crucial social need being tuned in to
a business venture. This is why we have
the worst medical system of all the advanced capitalist countries and the least
social benefits. An important aspect of
the attacks on public services by the two Wall Street parties is the
undermining of the public sector. We are
to believe that the private sector is more efficient in providing human needs
but it is not. Any successful and efficient operation like the US Postal
Service or the parks, the fire department etc. has to be undermined as it
undermines the 1%’s propaganda that the market is the answer to all things.
A manager of the Florida Department of Transportation gives
us an example of this propaganda that has a major influence on mass
consciousness when, according to BusinessWeek he says, with regard to the above
highway project in his state, “Without
private investment, the state couldn’t have finished the project until the late
2020s,”
What nonsense is this?
I am sure he believes this because he has been programed to believe it,
to believe that there is no money except “their”
money. It reminds me of Christopher
Hill’s reference to the English revolutionists who brave as they were could not
overcome their own belief that King Charles was king by God’s will, that he was
God’s representative on earth. Hill
referred to it as a “Stop in the mind”. Cromwell
suggested they cut off Charles’ head and see what happened. Voila, a new day was born and progress made.
The state bureaucrat has a stop in the mind. He believes it’s god’s will that a group of
individuals can own society’s wealth and that what we need to live a
productive, secure and decent life and that our homes, our health, our food and
how we move from place to place is ultimately determined by whether or not this
small group of individuals can profit from it.
The dominant ideas in society are the ideas of the ruling
class and these ideas are brought to us through their mass media, their
schools, their universities etc. We have to overcome this stop[ in the
mind. We produce the wealth and plenty
of it, it is simply a matter of how the wealth we produce is allocated, not
whether or not we can coax the 1% to part with it.
Imagine being in the desert and only one person of a large
group had ample water and that person refused to share it if we didn’t pay them
for it. We’d find a way to get that
water, we’d gang up on him and make him an offer he couldn’t refuse. He can
share the water but he can’t profit from it as we die of thirst. And there is a
way to provide the finances for our social needs. The first step in this
process is resistance. We must reject
that there is no money in society and we must reject the idea that public
services are wasteful we must also reject their austerity and view of the
world. Recognizing that capitalism is
wasteful and that a genuinely democratic socialist society and economy is the
alternative is a good step in the right direction.
*Capital, Vol. 1 chap 4.
The General Formula for Capital
No comments:
Post a Comment