by Michael Roberts
Just a short one on US growth now that the
Q3’12 real GDP data revision has been released. Third quarter
annualised real GDP growth was revised up from 2% to 2.7%. That sounds
good, but the devil is in the detail. It was only revised up because of
an increased estimate of inventories or stocks of goods produced. In
other words, US capitalists produced too much compared to demand and had
to stock the excess. Final demand or sales was revised down and, most
significant, non-residential investment (excluding the purchase of
homes) growth was taken down substantially.
This is last figure is the best measure of new investment by the
capitalist sector in an economy and it does not look good. Real
investment is still some 8% below the peak before the Great Recession.
Investment had fallen 24% from its peak in Q3’07 to mid-2009. Then it
recovered but is now slipping back again.
And the indicators for investment over the next few quarters are not
good either. One good indicator of where investment is going is to look
at ‘core’ capital goods orders (excluding aircraft and defence). That
is moving into recession territory, although it is probably too early to
judge. The figure is from the Doug Short site.
And yet corporate profits are still rising, at least when measured by
the rather artificial methods of the US Bureau of Economic Analysis of
corporate profits (after inventory and capital consumption adjustment).
If we take a ‘purer’ figure of net cash flow for US businesses (before
they pay tax, interest, dividends and make room for depreciation) it is
not quite so rosy.
Indeed, the gap between available profits and investment by the US
capitalist sector has never been greater. US capitalists are on an
investment strike, still not convinced that profitability is sufficient
to launch into new investment.
And contrary to the views of the underconsumptionists, household
consumption in the US as a share of GDP is only just off its all-time
high, at 70.5%. And yet investment to GDP is just 14% of GDP, no higher
than it was in the mid-1990s. The Great Recession was a product of
collapse in capitalist investment and the property market, not a
collapse in household spending.
So we remain in what I call a Long Depression. This is best shown in
my last graph. The gap between trend average real GDP growth per head
of population prior to the slump and actual growth opened up during the
Great Recession. But unlike previous recessions, that gap has not been
bridged in the recovery. Indeed, the gap is still widening on a per
capita basis. We are in unprecedented times at least since the Great
Depression of the 1930s.
- AFSCME Local 444 negotiations assesment 1997
- Preparing for Revolution: A discussion document
- The Internal lives of Revolutionary Organizations
- Socialist Alternative members: Questions and Answers
- Sanders: Our Alternative
- The Nature of the New European Left
- University of California workers and Unions
- An Invitation to Our Readers
- Facts For Working People Weekly Phone Conferences and Discussions
- Help open The AFL-CIO AIFLD Archives