by Michael Roberts
In response to my recent post, Profits call the tune, 26 June 2012, Doug Henwood (see Doug’s excellent site at http://lbo-news.com/) seemingly criticised my analysis of US profitability (http://lbo-news.com/2012/06/26/profitability-high-and-maybe-past-its-peak/#comment-6105.)
Doug starts by saying that “As every Marxist schoolchild knows, the profits “call the tune” for the capitalist economy, as Michael Roberts put it recently.“
Then Doug quoted from my post: “Despite the very high mass of profit
that has been generated since the economic recovery began, the rate of
profit stopped rising in 2011. That’s a sign that the US capitalist
economy will not achieve any significant sustainable growth over the
next year so so. The rate remains below the peak of 1997. But the rate
is clearly higher than in was in the late 1970s and early 1980s at its
trough. That can be explained by one counteracting factor, namely the
record high rate of surplus value in recent years. But it also suggests
that there is still a long way down to go for US capitalism before it
reaches the bottom of the current down phase.”
Doug does not agree. “That is not how I see it. I see a rather
high rate of profit that has maybe begun to roll over—but only after a
remarkable recovery from the Great Recession’s lows.” Doug then
presents his measure of US profitability as the profits of nonfinancial
corporations (before- and after-tax) divided by the value of the
tangible capital stock (at replacement cost). Now there are lots of
caveats about this measure of the US rate of profit – anybody who reads
my blog regularly will know what they are: replacement or historic cost
for tangible fixed assets, whole economy profits or corporate profits or
just non-financial corporate profits – I could go on. But let’s just
take Doug’s measure, reproduced below.
As far as I can see Doug’s data confirm exactly what I said in the
quote above that he criticises. US profitability peaked in 1997 to end
the neoliberal era and, although profitability recovered after the Great
Recession, it is still below that 1997 peak. My argument is that it
will be downhill from here towards lows not seen since 2001 or the early
1980s. Doug’s disagreement seems to boil down to him being less
ambitious in his forecast than I am. He puts it: ” I see a rather high rate of profit that has maybe begun to roll over…”. That’s a nuance maybe, unless it is more.
Doug goes onto highlight the huge build-up in cash by US corporations
and their failure to invest it, instead passing it onto shareholders or
abroad. On this blog, I have also done so (see Why is US recovery so weak? Look at profitability
3 April 2012). But I reckon that is happening because, although
domestic profitablity has recovered, it is not back to neoliberal
heights, and will be heading down from here. And the latest US GDP data
for Q1 2012, released this week, would seem to confirm that.
The BEA data show that corporate profits in Q1 were weaker than
previously thought. The broadest measure, corporate profits before tax
with capital consumption allowance and inventory adjustment, decreased
by 0.3% compared with Q4 2011. That was the first decrease in the mass
of profits since they hit their recession low in mid-2008. After tax
profits with adjustments decreased much more sharply, by 5.9%.
Interestingly, profits fell entirely because of declines in foreign
markets, not because of business problems at home. Profits from domestic
business rose at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $41.7bn in the
first quarter, while the rest-of-the-world component of profits
decreased $48.1 bn. So, for the moment, it is the crisis in Europe that
is hitting US profits. Whatever the reason, if the mass of profits have stopped rising, the rate of profit is very likely falling. As I have pointed out in previous posts (and referred to in my Profits call the tune
post), we don’t yet have the data to confirm this with my preferred
measure of the rate of profit. But I have made estimates for 2011 that
seem to show it. And I checked Doug’s measurement data for the US rate
of profit (pretax, non-financial) and found that it was 5.1% in 2009;
7.0% in 2010 and 6.9% in 2011. So I stick to the assertions made in the
quote highlighted by Doug.
No comments:
Post a Comment