by michael roberts
The news that UK unemployment was sharply on the rise last month was followed quickly by an estimate by the UK’s National Institute of Economic and Social Research (http://www.niesr.ac.uk)that Britain’s GDP probably rose only 0.5% in the last three months to September. The NIESR reckons that year-on-year real growth has been only 0.5% too. As a result, the level of real GDP is still 4% below its peak back in early 2008.If that’s right, then the recovery in the British economy since it bottomed in mid-2009 has been the weakest since 1918 after the end of the First World War. The recovery is even weaker than in the first period of the Great Depression during 1930-34. It is now 44 months since the peak of the UK GDP in 2008. After the same period in the Great Depression, the UK’s real GDP had nearly returned to its peak in 1930.
This depressing result was darkened further by the economic forecaster Ernst & Young (http://www.ey.com/UK/en/Issues/Business-environment/Financial-markets-and-economy/Economic-Outlook). Using the same forecasting methods as the UK government, E&Y reckons that the UK economy will grow less than 1% in the whole of 2011. And they have reduced their forecast for next year from 2.2% (hardly racing!) to just 1.5%.
The UK economy is crawling out of the slump of 2008-9. We now know from revised figures that real GDP contracted much more than previously thought in the slump – by over 7%. And the recovery is also weak. In an excellent post, Michael Burke at the Socialist Economic Bulletin (http://socialisteconomicbulletin.blogspot.com/) shows that the main reason that the recovery is so weak is that the Tory-Liberal coalition government has slashed back government investment just at a time when private sector investment is still unable or unwilling to take up the slack. Burke points out that during the slump about 80% of the loss in output was due to capitalist businesses going on an investment strike. However, since the recovery began, only half of the weakness can be attributed to a fall in private sector investment; the rest was due to the reduction in government investment.
I’ve argued in previous posts that a capitalist slump begins with a collapse in private sector investment, not a fall in household consumption, as many Keynesians argue. The slump in household spending comes later when businesses start laying off employees or cutting wages. Look at this graph on the components of UK real GDP since the beginning of 2008. The slump was led by a collapse in fixed investment, which fell 22% to a trough in mid-2009, while real GDP fell 7.1%, as we now know. But consumption fell less by 6.5% and then recovered better than GDP afterwards, up until mid-2010, when it began to decline again.
When the private sector goes on strike, the only way to keep investment going and sustain jobs is through government investment. And yet, as part of its austerity measures, this is precisely the area that pro-business governments want to cut. The UK coalition plans to cut government investment in roads, rail, housing, healthcare etc by 40% in real terms to 2015. In so doing, as Burke has argued, they are extending the recession into a depression, just as happened in the 1930s, only worse! We can see that when we break down UK investment between the private and government sector. As government investment is only one-fifth of capitalist investment, it was not enough to avoid an overall investment slump. But government investment did continue to rise through the slump. It was only when the coalition government applied its austerity cuts that it started to fall back. In the meantime, private sector investment fell to the end of 2009 and has remained in the doldrums.
Why has not private sector investment taken up the slack as the government hoped and promised? Well, UK corporate profitability is still struggling. Profits (gross operating surplus) fell 13% during the slump to reach a trough in mid-2010. Then there was a brief recovery before a flattening out.
And profitability (measured as operating surplus as share of GDP) is still below the level reached in 2005. Government bailouts helped financial sector profitability during 2009, but that has now faded and the banks and financial sector profitability is dropping back. The profitability of the rest of the UK corporations is still well below the peak of 2007.
Small businesses that employ the bulk of the British workforce are struggling, faced with heavy debts and low sales – so there’s no call to invest now. Also the large corporations are reluctant to invest in the UK. Over 40% of the top 100 UK companies are in energy, commodity resources and FIRE (finance, insurance and real estate). Also many make their money by investing abroad, not ploughing back cash domestically. Big profits have been made through soaring commodity and energy prices. But investment in these sectors goes mostly abroad. Domestic industry remains a weaker partner. Just as British capitalism took a bigger hit than other major capitalist economies in the financial crisis, because it is so much a rentier economy, its recovery is also weaker and oriented outside the UK.
While profitability for the capitalist sector remains low and the government sector (particularly investment) is cut back by the coalition, there is little prospect of any ‘normal’ recovery in the UK economy. Unemployment will continue towards 3m and with annualised inflation at a three-year high of 5.2% (5.6% if you include mortgage costs), average real household incomes will continue to fall, leading to further declines in real consumption. The UK economy will remain in depression.
MEMO from London’s Evening Standard
No comments:
Post a Comment