CAW members out in the cold |
I wrote recently of the Fiat bosses threatening workers in Italy
that if they didn’t accept concessions that would make them more competitive in
the global marketplace they would move production overseas. One of the suggested locations was North
America.
The Fiat bosses weren’t talking about Canada either. The country for cheaper and more pliant Labor
they were talking about is the United States.
After years of concessions, cutbacks and elimination of wages, rights
and benefits that took years of heroic struggle to win, US manufacturing
workers are becoming the apple in the global capitalists’ eye. From Greece to Indonesia, Nigeria to Ecuador,
workers and powerful indigenous movements are confronting the global offensive
of capital with an offensive of our own, by comparison, there’s relative Labor
peace.
So US workers, at the moment anyway, are a more secure
bet. With the help of the Labor
hierarchy and under the banner of free competition, the US bosses have indeed
driven the living standards of US workers closer to our brothers and sisters in
the former colonial world and below that of workers in other industrialized
economies. In the US there is now a low paid, fairly well educated working
class by global standards. The bosses, with the help of a trade Union
leadership who are on their team have convinced many of us against our gut
instincts that we must lower our expectations and our costs if we are to help
them win market share from their global rivals.
The heads of organized Labor have gone so far as to help them terminate
union activists who dared stand in the way of this race to the bottom.
In Canada, Caterpillar has locked members of the UAW out of
their workplace for refusing to accept major concessions demanded by the heavy
equipment manufacturer. The company is
threatening to move and it won’t have to move too far. Wage and benefit costs at a Caterpillar plant
in LaGrange Illinois are less than half of those at Caterpillar’s plant in
London Ontario.
The US “has become
much more efficient, making it more attractive for global manufacturers.” the
Wall
Street Journal reports. In 2010, US unit Labor costs in manufacturing were
13% lower than in 2000. There are
numerous commentaries on this blog under the “label” UAW to the right that explain how the bosses, with the
blatant collaboration of the heads of organized Labor at the highest levels,
have accomplished this.
Kudos to US workers and the middle class. We bailed out the bankers and the auto bosses to the tune of trillions of dollars and now we have accepted with barely a peep the driving our wages and conditions back to the level of the thirties before the great uprising that lead to the formation of the CIO. In contrast to the US decline, German unit Labor costs have risen 2.3%, Canada 18% and South Korea 15%. “Manufacturing in the US is more and more attractive,” an economist for the Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation tells the Wall Street Journal. It is not all wages; a business friendly environment and tax system as well as total domination of the political process by the two Wall Street parties and a weak dollar has helped. The inequality gap in the US though is well documented.
Kudos to US workers and the middle class. We bailed out the bankers and the auto bosses to the tune of trillions of dollars and now we have accepted with barely a peep the driving our wages and conditions back to the level of the thirties before the great uprising that lead to the formation of the CIO. In contrast to the US decline, German unit Labor costs have risen 2.3%, Canada 18% and South Korea 15%. “Manufacturing in the US is more and more attractive,” an economist for the Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation tells the Wall Street Journal. It is not all wages; a business friendly environment and tax system as well as total domination of the political process by the two Wall Street parties and a weak dollar has helped. The inequality gap in the US though is well documented.
If the Canadians want to be as “attractive” as us then they need to put their thinking caps
on. All Caterpillar wants to do is cut
their wages in half as auto manufacturers have done here in the US and those
pesky Canadians are opposed to it. But
how can the boss make profit if the Canadians don’t agree? Caterpillar says that it has to do this to
be “cost competitive” in the global
marketplace.
“The United Auto Workers in the US showed more flexibility” says Dan Ustian, CEO of Navistar International after the company shut down a Canadian plant and moved production elsewhere. Wages and work rule concessions were not forthcoming which prevented Navistar from coming to an agreement with the Canadians. Electrolux, the Swedish manufacturer is about to shut down its Quebec plant and move production to its new facility in Memphis, Tenn. The German manufacturer, Siemens closed a turbine plant in Hamilton Ontario and has moved production to North Carolina. The owners of the means of production hold communities and entire countries for ransom, cheap loans, cheaper, no union Labor power, compliant Labor leaders and tax incentives helped Siemens bosses make up their minds to move to NC. Cities, states and countries offer the global capitalists all sorts of taxpayer subsidies in order to convince them to invest as the rightful owners of capital. Competition between workers over wages, or our communities over the level of tax and other subsidies, or between workers in the different nation states is a sure road to ruin for us.
Here in the US since the beginning of the decade and
especially in the aftermath of the Great Recession and subsequent rise in
unemployment, bosses have managed to squeeze more out of the existing and wary
workforce. As hiring pretty much
languishes, US business has increased spending on fixed capital with spending
on equipment and software at an all time high in the third quarter of 2011
according to Bloomberg
Business Week. US bosses get almost
25% more goods and services out of us than they did in 1999 with the same
number of workers and as wages have declined.
“It’s as if $2.5 trillion worth of
stuff---the equivalent of the entire U.S. economy circa 1958—materialized out
of thin air” Business Week adds. It’s interesting how this magazine of the
US bourgeois describes the products of human sweat and blood, of our life
activity as “materializing out of thin
air”. It materialized out of
increased exploitation of Labor power.
It’s quite possible that the products that comprise this
$2.5 trillion might be worthless as far as their use value goes, but it is an
example of the increased exploitation of Labor power by capital as the price of
our Labor power has declined and the conditions under which it is used have
worsened. What is it like to have your
wages cut by 50%? When you go to the store, pay the landlord or mortgage banker
or go out to eat (not that you can do that anymore) they don’t lower prices to
accommodate your new situation do they? There’s no sliding scale of
prices. Even if you rely on public
subsidies like food stamps or any other social service these monies just like
our wages is the value we have created returned to us in the form of money. As Marx says of the wages of the worker, “It is the labor of last week, or of last
year, that pays for his labor-power (wages) this week or this year.”
We cannot win if we accept that we have to compete under the
terms the capitalist class sets for us.
We built Unions to protects us from competition not facilitate it, not
to compete against each other for who can work cheapest, fastest and under
conditions most favorable to profit taking.
It’s obvious to anyone that by competition we simply find ourselves in a
race to the bottom. And while the
Canadian Auto Workers leadership may be a little more aggressive and militant
than their US counterparts they still function within the confines of the market
and its laws which means their members must lose ground.
The Canadian Auto Workers president, Ken Lewenza has made it
clear that “his union is willing to be flexible” the WSJ reports, so from the
outset, the workers are doomed. Flexibility “is
simply a code word for falling wages” wrote Lester Thurow in his 1996 book,
The Future of Capitalism. So the
response of the workers’ leaders in Canada is to be more “flexible” than us here in the US and we in the US have to be more “flexible” than the workers in Mexico or
China. There is no end to it.
In the aftermath of the Great Recession they nationalized,
or took under conservatorship as the journals of capital call it, huge sections
of US industry including auto and housing.
They also rescued the market from the edge of the abyss through massive infusions
of public funds. Capitalists took these public
funds and speculated, bought other banks with them and stuff. It is obvious that the only answer to this
offensive of global capitalism and its inefficiency and waste is a global
offensive of a united and conscious workers’ movement.
Globalization has made the world smaller. Workers migrate from country to country. Agricultural production must liberated from the clutches of the clique that controls it and the production of food, as with the production of transportation and all the necessities of life, must be produced in a rational, planned way under the collective ownership, control and management of those of us whose Labor produces the wealth and the needs of human society.
There’s only one way outa here as they say.
Richard Mellor
Globalization has made the world smaller. Workers migrate from country to country. Agricultural production must liberated from the clutches of the clique that controls it and the production of food, as with the production of transportation and all the necessities of life, must be produced in a rational, planned way under the collective ownership, control and management of those of us whose Labor produces the wealth and the needs of human society.
There’s only one way outa here as they say.
Richard Mellor
No comments:
Post a Comment