Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired
In a previous post, I commented on the events surrounding the eviction of the National Guard from
the St. Paul MN Labor Center by a group of rank and file union members. A video
and commentary on the event was included in the post and the person that posted
the video, Cliff Willmeng, is a member of the Board of Directors of the Minnesota
Nurses Association (MNA). He is now under attack from many quarters including from
his own executive board.
Recognizing that I am commenting from afar and re-watching the video, I do
think that there could have been more fraternizing with the men and women in
the NG and a stronger effort at making a class appeal. It appears there was no attempt
to fraternize with the NG members at all. As I pointed out in the earlier
piece, many National Guard members are union members and certainly workers. I
say this as someone who is not on the ground in a very critical situation.
Here is a statement that the MNA
Executive Board has released to the public and I comment on this below:
screenshot |
On: April 17, 2021
Statement on actions of 4.15.21 at St.Paul Labor Center
“The Minnesota Nurses Association represents 22,000 Registered Nurses from diverse backgrounds, including those from Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, and North Dakota. We are Midwesterners, immigrants, native-born Americans, and Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color and veterans of our armed forces. MNA embraces and supports all of our members.
The
staging of the Minnesota National Guard at the St. Paul Labor Center occurred
without the approval or discussion amongst the unions that own the building
regarding the Guard’s request to utilize the building. MNA, like many unions,
has a position against the militarization of police and the use of military
force against protestors. The property itself is owned by a group of
Minnesota unions, including MNA. Upon hearing that the Guard were staging out
of the Labor Center, members from a number of these unions, including one
member of MNA’s Board of Directors, independently arrived to determine who had
authorized permission for the National Guard staging to take place.
A
difficult and serious conversation should then have occurred about why the
National Guard staging was taking place at the Labor Center and whether it
should be allowed. However, we became aware from an online video posted by the
MNA Board member, the actions that took place appeared to be a disrespectful
mocking of our fellow Minnesotans in uniform. MNA acknowledges the sacrifices
made by men and women in uniform and their families. We believe they should be
treated with respect, and we are grateful for their service.
MNA
also acknowledges the pain and trauma being experienced by the BIPOC
community. MNA believes people have the right to protest and participate
in causes they believe in, and nurses stand unwaveringly in support of the
BIPOC community, including their rights to peaceably assemble. MNA expresses
its sympathies to the victims and families of systemic racism, and MNA regrets
the actions of an individual member leader that evidently brought embarrassment,
anger, or frustration to those National Guard members”END
What is striking is that this statement
from the MNA Board of directors makes no attempt at all to defend a union member,
not just any member, but a member of their own board. Just the opposite. the
MNA Board of Directors joins with Republican and Democratic Party politicians,
right wing forces and no doubt the police, in attacking a worker and union
member who lost his job defending front line workers and is known as a strong fighter against racism in the community.
This MNA Executive Board statement says the Board, “acknowledges the pain and trauma being
experienced by the BIPOC community.", but makes no mention as to the source
of that pain and trauma which is the militarized police force that murders workers,
and particularly workers of color with impunity. The MNA board could have
raised, in an honest way any criticism it may have of Cliff Willmeng’s actions and then gone on to defend him and his
righteous defense of communities of color against police violence. The MNA
board could have opened up a debate about police violence, the attacks on
workers and our unions. Instead, the Board is outraged that an elected member,
acting as an individual, “…. evidently
brought
embarrassment,
anger, or frustration to those National Guard members”
I can assure the MNA Board that any embarrassment
any of those NG personnel felt at being evicted
from a labor hall by a group of rank and file union members, pales in
comparison to the pain and suffering experienced by victims of police murders
and an increasingly militarized state.
Were the MNA Executive Board and the leadership of the wider union movement in general, taking the correct position and going on the offensive with
regards to police violence and all the assaults working class people are facing
on the job and in the communities, the balance of class forces would shift
dramatically in our favor. Offering
constructive criticism is one thing, throwing a genuine dedicated union fighter
to the wolves is another. The statement from the MNA is a cowardly attempt to
rid themselves of a threat from the ranks and obscure their own role as passive complainers.
I agree, Richard. Rather than standing up for Cliff and others, this statement throws them under the bus. Could the protesters have been more respectful of the Guard and done more fraternizing? Perhaps, but it's always easy to criticize from afar and after the fact. The thing that must be emphasized is that the Guard should not have been using the Labor Center as a staging point, and especially not now. The MNA statement mentions this in passing, but doesn't say who authorized the use of the Labor Center and, much worse, then quickly shifts to attacking Cliff and others who showed up to undo what should not have been done in the first place.
ReplyDelete