It's her politics.
Fortunate Son Rand Paul Has Never Thanked the US Worker For Giving Him Opportunities |
Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired
Rand Paul told Breitbart about Ilhan Omar, "maybe after she’s visited Somalia for a while, she might come back and appreciate America more."
What arrogant scum these people are. Rand Paul is a privileged member of the US upper class, a political representative of dying economic system fortunate to have been born a white male. Many workers will fall for his historical dishonesty as more than any other advanced capitalist country, US workers and the population in general are completely ignorant about colonial and imperialist history in Africa or anywhere else.
Rand Paul told Breitbart about Ilhan Omar, "maybe after she’s visited Somalia for a while, she might come back and appreciate America more."
What arrogant scum these people are. Rand Paul is a privileged member of the US upper class, a political representative of dying economic system fortunate to have been born a white male. Many workers will fall for his historical dishonesty as more than any other advanced capitalist country, US workers and the population in general are completely ignorant about colonial and imperialist history in Africa or anywhere else.
He talks of Somalia as if it
has no history. He does this because to do so in an honest manner would explain
why this small country is like it is. Why is the Congo and other countries in
Africa continuously in crisis and unable to develop in the same manner that the
European democracies did? Because it is rich in natural resources, that's why. Nigeria,
Algeria, Kenya, Uganda Tanzania, I have heard such criticism about how backward
these countries are throughout my life.
I heard it about Latin America and about Ireland one of Britain's first colonies. The Irish were too stupid to govern, the blacks are as well and they can’t govern either, and so on. Without understanding history, racism, religious hatred, nationalism are the only explanations left. The colonizing power has to justify its position by demonizing the colonized. Why else would they be in charge? I am sure the Romans didn’t consider the original inhabitants of Britain to be smarter than them when they invaded in 55 BC and during their occupation of the island in the 1st century AD
I spent three years of my
early childhood in Nigeria, another former colony. This was a British colony as
was much of Africa. My father was in the army and he was posted there after
WW2. He spent the entire war as a prisoner of the Japanese in Hong Kong and then
Tokyo working for Mistubishi on the docks. Like millions of ordinary workers,
he was one of the victims of the great wars of the 20th century between the
former colonial powers of Europe and the Japanese which led then to the
domination of US imperialism on the world stage.
For over 200 years, some 15
to 20 million of Africa's inhabitants were kidnapped with 3 million of them brought to
the US. British capitalism was quite happy to be the leading transporter
of this cargo, and profiting handily from the slave trade. Liverpool and
Bristol became major ports in this process.
This relationship with Africa was primarily through coastal communities
and outposts where the cargo was picked up and loaded on to ships, it was less costly and not as dangerous as invading the land. But the
abolition of slavery, the development of capitalist industry and the struggle
for power between competing European powers necessitated expansion beyond the
confines of the nation state and forced the colonial powers to head deep in to the continent. Another problem was also the inability of
capitalist development to absorb the growing populations. This led to horrific
conditions in Britain as the peasantry was driven off the land unable to find
work. So the export of labor to the colonies was another by-product of
capitalism’s rise and it could be a base on which the plundering power could
rest. The plantation of Protestants in Ireland was another example of this
strategy.
Colonial Africa 1920 |
According to some sources, as
late as the 1870’s only 10% of the African continent was under direct European
rule but by 1900, European colonial powers, France, England, Germany Portugal,
had added some 10 million square miles of Africa as colonial possessions, about
one fifth of the land mass of the globe according to Dr Saul David in Slavery and
the Scramble For Africa. This was made possible to a great degree by the Berlin
conference of 1884-85 that was designed to prevent war and competition between
the colonial powers over the spoils.
The first World War revealed the worthlessness of treaties between the ruling classes of a social system in which the drive to war is an integral component; an agreement among thieves, by its very nature, is not binding. Millions of European workers died in this war so while the English working class benefited form British capitalism’s plunder of Africa, India and it’s colonial possessions, or a significant section of it did, millions of workers suffered there too. As for India, it has been estimated that British capitalism extracted some $40 trillion in wealth during its century of occupation in India.
The first World War revealed the worthlessness of treaties between the ruling classes of a social system in which the drive to war is an integral component; an agreement among thieves, by its very nature, is not binding. Millions of European workers died in this war so while the English working class benefited form British capitalism’s plunder of Africa, India and it’s colonial possessions, or a significant section of it did, millions of workers suffered there too. As for India, it has been estimated that British capitalism extracted some $40 trillion in wealth during its century of occupation in India.
If we look at the national
boundaries of the states in Africa, these were drawn up by the colonial
powers. There was British East Africa
and Nigeria for example, was an area under control of the Royal Niger Company
eventually becoming the two British protectorates (Protecting the economic
interests of the British ruling class not Africans living there) of Northern
and Southern Nigeria and eventually Nigeria. These borders are all artificially
imposed. Imagine Nigeria as a box and contained in it are numerous cultures, traditions and
tribal groupings who are now to adopt that national identity as “Nigerians”. It
is no wonder tribal identity prevailed for so long and national identity was
weak.
This is the same throughout
Africa and the former colonial world. In Nigeria, British capitalism profited
from the palm oil trade and also coal which was discovered there in 1909. There was a huge coal strike in Nigeria in in
1949 as miners fought for higher wages and better conditions. The management
refused to recognize the union and workers occupied the mines to avoid being
replaced. Miners’ wives got involved and
led protests at the mine offices. Mine owners used the police to attack the
women and the colonial government used the military and the police to crush the
strike fearing it was also a precursor to the drive for independence.
These events became known as
the Iva Valley Massacre. But this pales when compared to the 10 million or so
estimated to have died at the hands of Belgium’s King Leopold who considered
the Congo as his own back yard. The US and Belgium murdered Patrice Lumumba the
Congolese leader who fought for independence in the 1960’s.
I know less about Somalia
except it was French, British and Italian capitalism that controlled this part of the
world, fought proxy wars there and plundered its resources. I only ask my fellow workers that when you
read headlines in the US mass media about Rand Paul, in an interview with the
ant-union right wing website, Breitbart saying, "I’m
willing to contribute to buy her a ticket to go visit Somalia. I think she can
look and maybe learn a little bit about the disaster that is Somalia." , ask why
Somalia is a disaster and do a little investigation yourself.
I
do not support the Democratic Party. I would not vote for Omar on that basis.
But listen to her. Pay attention to what she says, party or not, she stands up
for workers interests far more than Paul, and is an embarrassment to Pelosi and
the Democratic Party power. Her four years in a refugee camp has made her a
tough nut. She is courageous and smart. I fear for her safety given the assault
on her by parasites like the sexual deviant Trump and this right wing fortunate
son, Rand Paul.
Rand
Paul is no friend of the worker. These people blame American workers for our
predicaments and the disaster that is the US. Auto-workers and unions are
blamed for the auto crisis and the export of jobs (we’re paid too much and too
lazy). The West Virginian working class is blamed for their own unemployment
and the subsequent drug crisis. Blacks are blamed for conditions among the
black working class that are a product of centuries of racism and exclusion
form society. Teachers are the cause of the crisis in public education. The
poor are to blame because they made the wrong decisions and the homeless the
same. It’s never capitalism
The
capitalist class in the former colonial world cannot solve the crises affecting
its millions of inhabitants. Somalia is a mess because of capitalism; it cannot
solve its own creation. Only a conscious and determined intervention by the
working class in the US and internationally can reverse the disastrous course
this rotten system and its adherents have charted for us. And the sooner rather
than the later. Nature doesn’t guarantee us a future as a species.
No comments:
Post a Comment